Cargando…
Lessons learned on the experienced facilitators and barriers of implementing a tailored VBHC model in a Dutch university hospital from a perspective of physicians and nurses
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to obtain insight into experienced facilitators and barriers of implementing a tailored value-based healthcare (VBHC) model in a Dutch university hospital from a perspective of physicians and nurses. METHOD: A descriptive qualitative study with 12 physicians, nurses and ma...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8728449/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34983762 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051764 |
_version_ | 1784626736170795008 |
---|---|
author | Lansdaal, Dane van Nassau, Femke van der Steen, Marije de Bruijne, Martine Smeulers, Marian |
author_facet | Lansdaal, Dane van Nassau, Femke van der Steen, Marije de Bruijne, Martine Smeulers, Marian |
author_sort | Lansdaal, Dane |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: This study aims to obtain insight into experienced facilitators and barriers of implementing a tailored value-based healthcare (VBHC) model in a Dutch university hospital from a perspective of physicians and nurses. METHOD: A descriptive qualitative study with 12 physicians, nurses and managers of seven different care pathways who were involved in the implementation of a tailored VBHC methodology was conducted. Thematic content analysis was used to analyse the data guided by all factors of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). FINDINGS: The method designed for the implementation of a tailored VBHC methodology was appointed as a structured guide for the process. Throughout the implementation process, leadership and team dynamics were considered as important for the implementation to succeed. Also, sharing experiences with other value teams and the cooperation with external Information Technology (IT) teams in the hospital was mentioned as desirable. The involvement of patients, that is part of the VBHC methodology, was considered useful in the decision-making and improvement of the care process because it gave better insights in topics that are important for patients. The time-consuming nature of the implementation process was named as barrier to the VBHC methodology. On top of that, the shaping of the involvement of patients and the ongoing changes in departments were established as difficult. Finally, working with the Electronic Health Records and acquiring the necessary digital skills were considered to be often forgotten and, thus, hindering implementation. CONCLUSION: Clinical Healthcare organisations implementing a tailored VBHC methodology will benefit from the use of a structured implementation methodology, a well-led strong team and cooperation with (external) teams and patients. However, shaping patient involvement, alignment with other departments and attention to digitisation were seen as a most important concerns in implementation and require further attention. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8728449 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87284492022-01-18 Lessons learned on the experienced facilitators and barriers of implementing a tailored VBHC model in a Dutch university hospital from a perspective of physicians and nurses Lansdaal, Dane van Nassau, Femke van der Steen, Marije de Bruijne, Martine Smeulers, Marian BMJ Open Health Economics OBJECTIVE: This study aims to obtain insight into experienced facilitators and barriers of implementing a tailored value-based healthcare (VBHC) model in a Dutch university hospital from a perspective of physicians and nurses. METHOD: A descriptive qualitative study with 12 physicians, nurses and managers of seven different care pathways who were involved in the implementation of a tailored VBHC methodology was conducted. Thematic content analysis was used to analyse the data guided by all factors of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). FINDINGS: The method designed for the implementation of a tailored VBHC methodology was appointed as a structured guide for the process. Throughout the implementation process, leadership and team dynamics were considered as important for the implementation to succeed. Also, sharing experiences with other value teams and the cooperation with external Information Technology (IT) teams in the hospital was mentioned as desirable. The involvement of patients, that is part of the VBHC methodology, was considered useful in the decision-making and improvement of the care process because it gave better insights in topics that are important for patients. The time-consuming nature of the implementation process was named as barrier to the VBHC methodology. On top of that, the shaping of the involvement of patients and the ongoing changes in departments were established as difficult. Finally, working with the Electronic Health Records and acquiring the necessary digital skills were considered to be often forgotten and, thus, hindering implementation. CONCLUSION: Clinical Healthcare organisations implementing a tailored VBHC methodology will benefit from the use of a structured implementation methodology, a well-led strong team and cooperation with (external) teams and patients. However, shaping patient involvement, alignment with other departments and attention to digitisation were seen as a most important concerns in implementation and require further attention. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-01-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8728449/ /pubmed/34983762 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051764 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Health Economics Lansdaal, Dane van Nassau, Femke van der Steen, Marije de Bruijne, Martine Smeulers, Marian Lessons learned on the experienced facilitators and barriers of implementing a tailored VBHC model in a Dutch university hospital from a perspective of physicians and nurses |
title | Lessons learned on the experienced facilitators and barriers of implementing a tailored VBHC model in a Dutch university hospital from a perspective of physicians and nurses |
title_full | Lessons learned on the experienced facilitators and barriers of implementing a tailored VBHC model in a Dutch university hospital from a perspective of physicians and nurses |
title_fullStr | Lessons learned on the experienced facilitators and barriers of implementing a tailored VBHC model in a Dutch university hospital from a perspective of physicians and nurses |
title_full_unstemmed | Lessons learned on the experienced facilitators and barriers of implementing a tailored VBHC model in a Dutch university hospital from a perspective of physicians and nurses |
title_short | Lessons learned on the experienced facilitators and barriers of implementing a tailored VBHC model in a Dutch university hospital from a perspective of physicians and nurses |
title_sort | lessons learned on the experienced facilitators and barriers of implementing a tailored vbhc model in a dutch university hospital from a perspective of physicians and nurses |
topic | Health Economics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8728449/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34983762 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051764 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lansdaaldane lessonslearnedontheexperiencedfacilitatorsandbarriersofimplementingatailoredvbhcmodelinadutchuniversityhospitalfromaperspectiveofphysiciansandnurses AT vannassaufemke lessonslearnedontheexperiencedfacilitatorsandbarriersofimplementingatailoredvbhcmodelinadutchuniversityhospitalfromaperspectiveofphysiciansandnurses AT vandersteenmarije lessonslearnedontheexperiencedfacilitatorsandbarriersofimplementingatailoredvbhcmodelinadutchuniversityhospitalfromaperspectiveofphysiciansandnurses AT debruijnemartine lessonslearnedontheexperiencedfacilitatorsandbarriersofimplementingatailoredvbhcmodelinadutchuniversityhospitalfromaperspectiveofphysiciansandnurses AT smeulersmarian lessonslearnedontheexperiencedfacilitatorsandbarriersofimplementingatailoredvbhcmodelinadutchuniversityhospitalfromaperspectiveofphysiciansandnurses |