Cargando…
Using machine learning to predict blood culture outcomes in the emergency department: a single-centre, retrospective, observational study
OBJECTIVES: To develop predictive models for blood culture (BC) outcomes in an emergency department (ED) setting. DESIGN: Retrospective observational study. SETTING: ED of a large teaching hospital in the Netherlands between 1 September 2018 and 24 June 2020. PARTICIPANTS: Adult patients from whom B...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8728456/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34983764 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053332 |
_version_ | 1784626737425940480 |
---|---|
author | Boerman, Anneroos W Schinkel, Michiel Meijerink, Lotta van den Ende, Eva S Pladet, Lara CA Scholtemeijer, Martijn G Zeeuw, Joost van der Zaag, Anuschka Y Minderhoud, Tanca C Elbers, Paul W G Wiersinga, W Joost de Jonge, Robert Kramer, Mark HH Nanayakkara, Prabath W B |
author_facet | Boerman, Anneroos W Schinkel, Michiel Meijerink, Lotta van den Ende, Eva S Pladet, Lara CA Scholtemeijer, Martijn G Zeeuw, Joost van der Zaag, Anuschka Y Minderhoud, Tanca C Elbers, Paul W G Wiersinga, W Joost de Jonge, Robert Kramer, Mark HH Nanayakkara, Prabath W B |
author_sort | Boerman, Anneroos W |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To develop predictive models for blood culture (BC) outcomes in an emergency department (ED) setting. DESIGN: Retrospective observational study. SETTING: ED of a large teaching hospital in the Netherlands between 1 September 2018 and 24 June 2020. PARTICIPANTS: Adult patients from whom BCs were collected in the ED. Data of demographic information, vital signs, administered medications in the ED and laboratory and radiology results were extracted from the electronic health record, if available at the end of the ED visits. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the performance of two models (logistic regression and gradient boosted trees) to predict bacteraemia in ED patients, defined as at least one true positive BC collected at the ED. RESULTS: In 4885 out of 51 399 ED visits (9.5%), BCs were collected. In 598/4885 (12.2%) visits, at least one of the BCs was true positive. Both a gradient boosted tree model and a logistic regression model showed good performance in predicting BC results with area under curve of the receiver operating characteristics of 0.77 (95% CI 0.73 to 0.82) and 0.78 (95% CI 0.73 to 0.82) in the test sets, respectively. In the gradient boosted tree model, the optimal threshold would predict 69% of BCs in the test set to be negative, with a negative predictive value of over 94%. CONCLUSIONS: Both models can accurately identify patients with low risk of bacteraemia at the ED in this single-centre setting and may be useful to reduce unnecessary BCs and associated healthcare costs. Further studies are necessary for validation and to investigate the potential clinical benefits and possible risks after implementation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8728456 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87284562022-01-18 Using machine learning to predict blood culture outcomes in the emergency department: a single-centre, retrospective, observational study Boerman, Anneroos W Schinkel, Michiel Meijerink, Lotta van den Ende, Eva S Pladet, Lara CA Scholtemeijer, Martijn G Zeeuw, Joost van der Zaag, Anuschka Y Minderhoud, Tanca C Elbers, Paul W G Wiersinga, W Joost de Jonge, Robert Kramer, Mark HH Nanayakkara, Prabath W B BMJ Open Emergency Medicine OBJECTIVES: To develop predictive models for blood culture (BC) outcomes in an emergency department (ED) setting. DESIGN: Retrospective observational study. SETTING: ED of a large teaching hospital in the Netherlands between 1 September 2018 and 24 June 2020. PARTICIPANTS: Adult patients from whom BCs were collected in the ED. Data of demographic information, vital signs, administered medications in the ED and laboratory and radiology results were extracted from the electronic health record, if available at the end of the ED visits. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the performance of two models (logistic regression and gradient boosted trees) to predict bacteraemia in ED patients, defined as at least one true positive BC collected at the ED. RESULTS: In 4885 out of 51 399 ED visits (9.5%), BCs were collected. In 598/4885 (12.2%) visits, at least one of the BCs was true positive. Both a gradient boosted tree model and a logistic regression model showed good performance in predicting BC results with area under curve of the receiver operating characteristics of 0.77 (95% CI 0.73 to 0.82) and 0.78 (95% CI 0.73 to 0.82) in the test sets, respectively. In the gradient boosted tree model, the optimal threshold would predict 69% of BCs in the test set to be negative, with a negative predictive value of over 94%. CONCLUSIONS: Both models can accurately identify patients with low risk of bacteraemia at the ED in this single-centre setting and may be useful to reduce unnecessary BCs and associated healthcare costs. Further studies are necessary for validation and to investigate the potential clinical benefits and possible risks after implementation. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-01-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8728456/ /pubmed/34983764 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053332 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Emergency Medicine Boerman, Anneroos W Schinkel, Michiel Meijerink, Lotta van den Ende, Eva S Pladet, Lara CA Scholtemeijer, Martijn G Zeeuw, Joost van der Zaag, Anuschka Y Minderhoud, Tanca C Elbers, Paul W G Wiersinga, W Joost de Jonge, Robert Kramer, Mark HH Nanayakkara, Prabath W B Using machine learning to predict blood culture outcomes in the emergency department: a single-centre, retrospective, observational study |
title | Using machine learning to predict blood culture outcomes in the emergency department: a single-centre, retrospective, observational study |
title_full | Using machine learning to predict blood culture outcomes in the emergency department: a single-centre, retrospective, observational study |
title_fullStr | Using machine learning to predict blood culture outcomes in the emergency department: a single-centre, retrospective, observational study |
title_full_unstemmed | Using machine learning to predict blood culture outcomes in the emergency department: a single-centre, retrospective, observational study |
title_short | Using machine learning to predict blood culture outcomes in the emergency department: a single-centre, retrospective, observational study |
title_sort | using machine learning to predict blood culture outcomes in the emergency department: a single-centre, retrospective, observational study |
topic | Emergency Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8728456/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34983764 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053332 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT boermananneroosw usingmachinelearningtopredictbloodcultureoutcomesintheemergencydepartmentasinglecentreretrospectiveobservationalstudy AT schinkelmichiel usingmachinelearningtopredictbloodcultureoutcomesintheemergencydepartmentasinglecentreretrospectiveobservationalstudy AT meijerinklotta usingmachinelearningtopredictbloodcultureoutcomesintheemergencydepartmentasinglecentreretrospectiveobservationalstudy AT vandenendeevas usingmachinelearningtopredictbloodcultureoutcomesintheemergencydepartmentasinglecentreretrospectiveobservationalstudy AT pladetlaraca usingmachinelearningtopredictbloodcultureoutcomesintheemergencydepartmentasinglecentreretrospectiveobservationalstudy AT scholtemeijermartijng usingmachinelearningtopredictbloodcultureoutcomesintheemergencydepartmentasinglecentreretrospectiveobservationalstudy AT zeeuwjoost usingmachinelearningtopredictbloodcultureoutcomesintheemergencydepartmentasinglecentreretrospectiveobservationalstudy AT vanderzaaganuschkay usingmachinelearningtopredictbloodcultureoutcomesintheemergencydepartmentasinglecentreretrospectiveobservationalstudy AT minderhoudtancac usingmachinelearningtopredictbloodcultureoutcomesintheemergencydepartmentasinglecentreretrospectiveobservationalstudy AT elberspaulwg usingmachinelearningtopredictbloodcultureoutcomesintheemergencydepartmentasinglecentreretrospectiveobservationalstudy AT wiersingawjoost usingmachinelearningtopredictbloodcultureoutcomesintheemergencydepartmentasinglecentreretrospectiveobservationalstudy AT dejongerobert usingmachinelearningtopredictbloodcultureoutcomesintheemergencydepartmentasinglecentreretrospectiveobservationalstudy AT kramermarkhh usingmachinelearningtopredictbloodcultureoutcomesintheemergencydepartmentasinglecentreretrospectiveobservationalstudy AT nanayakkaraprabathwb usingmachinelearningtopredictbloodcultureoutcomesintheemergencydepartmentasinglecentreretrospectiveobservationalstudy |