Cargando…

Using machine learning to predict blood culture outcomes in the emergency department: a single-centre, retrospective, observational study

OBJECTIVES: To develop predictive models for blood culture (BC) outcomes in an emergency department (ED) setting. DESIGN: Retrospective observational study. SETTING: ED of a large teaching hospital in the Netherlands between 1 September 2018 and 24 June 2020. PARTICIPANTS: Adult patients from whom B...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Boerman, Anneroos W, Schinkel, Michiel, Meijerink, Lotta, van den Ende, Eva S, Pladet, Lara CA, Scholtemeijer, Martijn G, Zeeuw, Joost, van der Zaag, Anuschka Y, Minderhoud, Tanca C, Elbers, Paul W G, Wiersinga, W Joost, de Jonge, Robert, Kramer, Mark HH, Nanayakkara, Prabath W B
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8728456/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34983764
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053332
_version_ 1784626737425940480
author Boerman, Anneroos W
Schinkel, Michiel
Meijerink, Lotta
van den Ende, Eva S
Pladet, Lara CA
Scholtemeijer, Martijn G
Zeeuw, Joost
van der Zaag, Anuschka Y
Minderhoud, Tanca C
Elbers, Paul W G
Wiersinga, W Joost
de Jonge, Robert
Kramer, Mark HH
Nanayakkara, Prabath W B
author_facet Boerman, Anneroos W
Schinkel, Michiel
Meijerink, Lotta
van den Ende, Eva S
Pladet, Lara CA
Scholtemeijer, Martijn G
Zeeuw, Joost
van der Zaag, Anuschka Y
Minderhoud, Tanca C
Elbers, Paul W G
Wiersinga, W Joost
de Jonge, Robert
Kramer, Mark HH
Nanayakkara, Prabath W B
author_sort Boerman, Anneroos W
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To develop predictive models for blood culture (BC) outcomes in an emergency department (ED) setting. DESIGN: Retrospective observational study. SETTING: ED of a large teaching hospital in the Netherlands between 1 September 2018 and 24 June 2020. PARTICIPANTS: Adult patients from whom BCs were collected in the ED. Data of demographic information, vital signs, administered medications in the ED and laboratory and radiology results were extracted from the electronic health record, if available at the end of the ED visits. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the performance of two models (logistic regression and gradient boosted trees) to predict bacteraemia in ED patients, defined as at least one true positive BC collected at the ED. RESULTS: In 4885 out of 51 399 ED visits (9.5%), BCs were collected. In 598/4885 (12.2%) visits, at least one of the BCs was true positive. Both a gradient boosted tree model and a logistic regression model showed good performance in predicting BC results with area under curve of the receiver operating characteristics of 0.77 (95% CI 0.73 to 0.82) and 0.78 (95% CI 0.73 to 0.82) in the test sets, respectively. In the gradient boosted tree model, the optimal threshold would predict 69% of BCs in the test set to be negative, with a negative predictive value of over 94%. CONCLUSIONS: Both models can accurately identify patients with low risk of bacteraemia at the ED in this single-centre setting and may be useful to reduce unnecessary BCs and associated healthcare costs. Further studies are necessary for validation and to investigate the potential clinical benefits and possible risks after implementation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8728456
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87284562022-01-18 Using machine learning to predict blood culture outcomes in the emergency department: a single-centre, retrospective, observational study Boerman, Anneroos W Schinkel, Michiel Meijerink, Lotta van den Ende, Eva S Pladet, Lara CA Scholtemeijer, Martijn G Zeeuw, Joost van der Zaag, Anuschka Y Minderhoud, Tanca C Elbers, Paul W G Wiersinga, W Joost de Jonge, Robert Kramer, Mark HH Nanayakkara, Prabath W B BMJ Open Emergency Medicine OBJECTIVES: To develop predictive models for blood culture (BC) outcomes in an emergency department (ED) setting. DESIGN: Retrospective observational study. SETTING: ED of a large teaching hospital in the Netherlands between 1 September 2018 and 24 June 2020. PARTICIPANTS: Adult patients from whom BCs were collected in the ED. Data of demographic information, vital signs, administered medications in the ED and laboratory and radiology results were extracted from the electronic health record, if available at the end of the ED visits. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the performance of two models (logistic regression and gradient boosted trees) to predict bacteraemia in ED patients, defined as at least one true positive BC collected at the ED. RESULTS: In 4885 out of 51 399 ED visits (9.5%), BCs were collected. In 598/4885 (12.2%) visits, at least one of the BCs was true positive. Both a gradient boosted tree model and a logistic regression model showed good performance in predicting BC results with area under curve of the receiver operating characteristics of 0.77 (95% CI 0.73 to 0.82) and 0.78 (95% CI 0.73 to 0.82) in the test sets, respectively. In the gradient boosted tree model, the optimal threshold would predict 69% of BCs in the test set to be negative, with a negative predictive value of over 94%. CONCLUSIONS: Both models can accurately identify patients with low risk of bacteraemia at the ED in this single-centre setting and may be useful to reduce unnecessary BCs and associated healthcare costs. Further studies are necessary for validation and to investigate the potential clinical benefits and possible risks after implementation. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-01-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8728456/ /pubmed/34983764 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053332 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Emergency Medicine
Boerman, Anneroos W
Schinkel, Michiel
Meijerink, Lotta
van den Ende, Eva S
Pladet, Lara CA
Scholtemeijer, Martijn G
Zeeuw, Joost
van der Zaag, Anuschka Y
Minderhoud, Tanca C
Elbers, Paul W G
Wiersinga, W Joost
de Jonge, Robert
Kramer, Mark HH
Nanayakkara, Prabath W B
Using machine learning to predict blood culture outcomes in the emergency department: a single-centre, retrospective, observational study
title Using machine learning to predict blood culture outcomes in the emergency department: a single-centre, retrospective, observational study
title_full Using machine learning to predict blood culture outcomes in the emergency department: a single-centre, retrospective, observational study
title_fullStr Using machine learning to predict blood culture outcomes in the emergency department: a single-centre, retrospective, observational study
title_full_unstemmed Using machine learning to predict blood culture outcomes in the emergency department: a single-centre, retrospective, observational study
title_short Using machine learning to predict blood culture outcomes in the emergency department: a single-centre, retrospective, observational study
title_sort using machine learning to predict blood culture outcomes in the emergency department: a single-centre, retrospective, observational study
topic Emergency Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8728456/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34983764
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053332
work_keys_str_mv AT boermananneroosw usingmachinelearningtopredictbloodcultureoutcomesintheemergencydepartmentasinglecentreretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT schinkelmichiel usingmachinelearningtopredictbloodcultureoutcomesintheemergencydepartmentasinglecentreretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT meijerinklotta usingmachinelearningtopredictbloodcultureoutcomesintheemergencydepartmentasinglecentreretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT vandenendeevas usingmachinelearningtopredictbloodcultureoutcomesintheemergencydepartmentasinglecentreretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT pladetlaraca usingmachinelearningtopredictbloodcultureoutcomesintheemergencydepartmentasinglecentreretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT scholtemeijermartijng usingmachinelearningtopredictbloodcultureoutcomesintheemergencydepartmentasinglecentreretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT zeeuwjoost usingmachinelearningtopredictbloodcultureoutcomesintheemergencydepartmentasinglecentreretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT vanderzaaganuschkay usingmachinelearningtopredictbloodcultureoutcomesintheemergencydepartmentasinglecentreretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT minderhoudtancac usingmachinelearningtopredictbloodcultureoutcomesintheemergencydepartmentasinglecentreretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT elberspaulwg usingmachinelearningtopredictbloodcultureoutcomesintheemergencydepartmentasinglecentreretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT wiersingawjoost usingmachinelearningtopredictbloodcultureoutcomesintheemergencydepartmentasinglecentreretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT dejongerobert usingmachinelearningtopredictbloodcultureoutcomesintheemergencydepartmentasinglecentreretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT kramermarkhh usingmachinelearningtopredictbloodcultureoutcomesintheemergencydepartmentasinglecentreretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT nanayakkaraprabathwb usingmachinelearningtopredictbloodcultureoutcomesintheemergencydepartmentasinglecentreretrospectiveobservationalstudy