Cargando…

Comparison of treatment outcomes in chronic coccygodynia patients treated with ganglion impar blockade (versus) caudal epidural steroid injection: a prospective randomized comparison study

BACKGROUND: Coccygodynia is one of the chronic, refractory painful musculoskeletal disorders. Interventional procedures are applied to patients unresponsive to initial treatment in coccygodynia. This study aims to compare the treatment outcomes of ganglion impar block (GIB) and caudal epidural stero...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sencan, Savas, Yolcu, Gunay, Bilim, Serhad, Kenis-Coskun, Ozge, Gunduz, Osman Hakan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Pain Society 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8728552/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34966017
http://dx.doi.org/10.3344/kjp.2022.35.1.106
_version_ 1784626761859858432
author Sencan, Savas
Yolcu, Gunay
Bilim, Serhad
Kenis-Coskun, Ozge
Gunduz, Osman Hakan
author_facet Sencan, Savas
Yolcu, Gunay
Bilim, Serhad
Kenis-Coskun, Ozge
Gunduz, Osman Hakan
author_sort Sencan, Savas
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Coccygodynia is one of the chronic, refractory painful musculoskeletal disorders. Interventional procedures are applied to patients unresponsive to initial treatment in coccygodynia. This study aims to compare the treatment outcomes of ganglion impar block (GIB) and caudal epidural steroid injection (CESI) in patients with chronic coccygodynia. METHODS: This study was a prospective randomized comparison study conducted between June 2019 and January 2021. Patients diagnosed with chronic coccygodynia were randomly divided into two groups the GIB group and the CESI group. The severity of pain, presence of neuropathic pain, and quality of life were evaluated using the Numeric Rating Scale, Leeds Assessment of the Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs Scale, and Short Form-12 Health Survey (SF-12), respectively. RESULTS: A total of 34 patients in each group were included in the final analyses. While there was a significant decrease in pain intensity in both groups in the 3-month follow-up, this decrease was more significant in the GIB group at the 3rd week. There was a significant improvement in the SF-12 physical score and the number of patients with neuropathic pain in both groups in the 3rd week, but this improvement was not observed in the 3rd month. CONCLUSIONS: Although GIB may provide more pain relief in short term, both GIB and CESI are useful treatment methods in coccygodynia unresponsive to more conservative treatments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8728552
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher The Korean Pain Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87285522022-01-12 Comparison of treatment outcomes in chronic coccygodynia patients treated with ganglion impar blockade (versus) caudal epidural steroid injection: a prospective randomized comparison study Sencan, Savas Yolcu, Gunay Bilim, Serhad Kenis-Coskun, Ozge Gunduz, Osman Hakan Korean J Pain Clinical Research Articles BACKGROUND: Coccygodynia is one of the chronic, refractory painful musculoskeletal disorders. Interventional procedures are applied to patients unresponsive to initial treatment in coccygodynia. This study aims to compare the treatment outcomes of ganglion impar block (GIB) and caudal epidural steroid injection (CESI) in patients with chronic coccygodynia. METHODS: This study was a prospective randomized comparison study conducted between June 2019 and January 2021. Patients diagnosed with chronic coccygodynia were randomly divided into two groups the GIB group and the CESI group. The severity of pain, presence of neuropathic pain, and quality of life were evaluated using the Numeric Rating Scale, Leeds Assessment of the Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs Scale, and Short Form-12 Health Survey (SF-12), respectively. RESULTS: A total of 34 patients in each group were included in the final analyses. While there was a significant decrease in pain intensity in both groups in the 3-month follow-up, this decrease was more significant in the GIB group at the 3rd week. There was a significant improvement in the SF-12 physical score and the number of patients with neuropathic pain in both groups in the 3rd week, but this improvement was not observed in the 3rd month. CONCLUSIONS: Although GIB may provide more pain relief in short term, both GIB and CESI are useful treatment methods in coccygodynia unresponsive to more conservative treatments. The Korean Pain Society 2022-01-01 2022-01-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8728552/ /pubmed/34966017 http://dx.doi.org/10.3344/kjp.2022.35.1.106 Text en © The Korean Pain Society, 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Research Articles
Sencan, Savas
Yolcu, Gunay
Bilim, Serhad
Kenis-Coskun, Ozge
Gunduz, Osman Hakan
Comparison of treatment outcomes in chronic coccygodynia patients treated with ganglion impar blockade (versus) caudal epidural steroid injection: a prospective randomized comparison study
title Comparison of treatment outcomes in chronic coccygodynia patients treated with ganglion impar blockade (versus) caudal epidural steroid injection: a prospective randomized comparison study
title_full Comparison of treatment outcomes in chronic coccygodynia patients treated with ganglion impar blockade (versus) caudal epidural steroid injection: a prospective randomized comparison study
title_fullStr Comparison of treatment outcomes in chronic coccygodynia patients treated with ganglion impar blockade (versus) caudal epidural steroid injection: a prospective randomized comparison study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of treatment outcomes in chronic coccygodynia patients treated with ganglion impar blockade (versus) caudal epidural steroid injection: a prospective randomized comparison study
title_short Comparison of treatment outcomes in chronic coccygodynia patients treated with ganglion impar blockade (versus) caudal epidural steroid injection: a prospective randomized comparison study
title_sort comparison of treatment outcomes in chronic coccygodynia patients treated with ganglion impar blockade (versus) caudal epidural steroid injection: a prospective randomized comparison study
topic Clinical Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8728552/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34966017
http://dx.doi.org/10.3344/kjp.2022.35.1.106
work_keys_str_mv AT sencansavas comparisonoftreatmentoutcomesinchroniccoccygodyniapatientstreatedwithganglionimparblockadeversuscaudalepiduralsteroidinjectionaprospectiverandomizedcomparisonstudy
AT yolcugunay comparisonoftreatmentoutcomesinchroniccoccygodyniapatientstreatedwithganglionimparblockadeversuscaudalepiduralsteroidinjectionaprospectiverandomizedcomparisonstudy
AT bilimserhad comparisonoftreatmentoutcomesinchroniccoccygodyniapatientstreatedwithganglionimparblockadeversuscaudalepiduralsteroidinjectionaprospectiverandomizedcomparisonstudy
AT keniscoskunozge comparisonoftreatmentoutcomesinchroniccoccygodyniapatientstreatedwithganglionimparblockadeversuscaudalepiduralsteroidinjectionaprospectiverandomizedcomparisonstudy
AT gunduzosmanhakan comparisonoftreatmentoutcomesinchroniccoccygodyniapatientstreatedwithganglionimparblockadeversuscaudalepiduralsteroidinjectionaprospectiverandomizedcomparisonstudy