Cargando…

Evaluation of I-TAC as a potential early plasma marker to differentiate between critical and non-critical COVID-19

The COVID-19 pandemic has led to significant global health and economic consequences. There is an unmet need to define a molecular fingerprint of severity of the disease that may guide an early, rational and directed intervention preventing severe illness. We collected plasma from patients with mode...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Yushan, Xu, Chao, Agudelo Higuita, Nelson I., Bhattacharya, Resham, Chakrabarty, Jennifer Holter, Mukherjee, Priyabrata
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Shared Science Publishers OG 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8728569/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35083423
http://dx.doi.org/10.15698/cst2022.01.262
_version_ 1784626766285897728
author Zhang, Yushan
Xu, Chao
Agudelo Higuita, Nelson I.
Bhattacharya, Resham
Chakrabarty, Jennifer Holter
Mukherjee, Priyabrata
author_facet Zhang, Yushan
Xu, Chao
Agudelo Higuita, Nelson I.
Bhattacharya, Resham
Chakrabarty, Jennifer Holter
Mukherjee, Priyabrata
author_sort Zhang, Yushan
collection PubMed
description The COVID-19 pandemic has led to significant global health and economic consequences. There is an unmet need to define a molecular fingerprint of severity of the disease that may guide an early, rational and directed intervention preventing severe illness. We collected plasma from patients with moderate (nine cases), severe (22 cases) and critical (five cases) COVID-19 within three days of hospitalization (approximately one week after symptom onset) and used a cytokine antibody array to screen the 105 cytokines included in the array. We found that I-TAC, IP-10, ST2 and IL-1ra were significantly upregulated in patients with critical disease as compared to the non-critical (moderate and severe combined). ELISA further quantified I-TAC levels as 590.24±410.89, 645.35±517.59 and 1613.53±1010.59 pg/ml in moderate, severe and critical groups, respectively. Statistical analysis showed that I-TAC levels were significantly higher in patients with critical disease when compared with moderate (p = 0.04), severe (p = 0.03) or the combined non-critical (p = 0.02) group. Although limited by the low sample numbers, this study may suggest a role of I-TAC as a potential early marker to discriminate between critical and non-critical COVID-19 cases. Such knowledge is urgently needed for appropriate allocation of resources and to serve as a platform for future research towards early interventions that could mitigate disease severity and save lives.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8728569
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Shared Science Publishers OG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87285692022-01-25 Evaluation of I-TAC as a potential early plasma marker to differentiate between critical and non-critical COVID-19 Zhang, Yushan Xu, Chao Agudelo Higuita, Nelson I. Bhattacharya, Resham Chakrabarty, Jennifer Holter Mukherjee, Priyabrata Cell Stress Research Article The COVID-19 pandemic has led to significant global health and economic consequences. There is an unmet need to define a molecular fingerprint of severity of the disease that may guide an early, rational and directed intervention preventing severe illness. We collected plasma from patients with moderate (nine cases), severe (22 cases) and critical (five cases) COVID-19 within three days of hospitalization (approximately one week after symptom onset) and used a cytokine antibody array to screen the 105 cytokines included in the array. We found that I-TAC, IP-10, ST2 and IL-1ra were significantly upregulated in patients with critical disease as compared to the non-critical (moderate and severe combined). ELISA further quantified I-TAC levels as 590.24±410.89, 645.35±517.59 and 1613.53±1010.59 pg/ml in moderate, severe and critical groups, respectively. Statistical analysis showed that I-TAC levels were significantly higher in patients with critical disease when compared with moderate (p = 0.04), severe (p = 0.03) or the combined non-critical (p = 0.02) group. Although limited by the low sample numbers, this study may suggest a role of I-TAC as a potential early marker to discriminate between critical and non-critical COVID-19 cases. Such knowledge is urgently needed for appropriate allocation of resources and to serve as a platform for future research towards early interventions that could mitigate disease severity and save lives. Shared Science Publishers OG 2021-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8728569/ /pubmed/35083423 http://dx.doi.org/10.15698/cst2022.01.262 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Zhang et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article released under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license, which allows the unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are acknowledged.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zhang, Yushan
Xu, Chao
Agudelo Higuita, Nelson I.
Bhattacharya, Resham
Chakrabarty, Jennifer Holter
Mukherjee, Priyabrata
Evaluation of I-TAC as a potential early plasma marker to differentiate between critical and non-critical COVID-19
title Evaluation of I-TAC as a potential early plasma marker to differentiate between critical and non-critical COVID-19
title_full Evaluation of I-TAC as a potential early plasma marker to differentiate between critical and non-critical COVID-19
title_fullStr Evaluation of I-TAC as a potential early plasma marker to differentiate between critical and non-critical COVID-19
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of I-TAC as a potential early plasma marker to differentiate between critical and non-critical COVID-19
title_short Evaluation of I-TAC as a potential early plasma marker to differentiate between critical and non-critical COVID-19
title_sort evaluation of i-tac as a potential early plasma marker to differentiate between critical and non-critical covid-19
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8728569/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35083423
http://dx.doi.org/10.15698/cst2022.01.262
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangyushan evaluationofitacasapotentialearlyplasmamarkertodifferentiatebetweencriticalandnoncriticalcovid19
AT xuchao evaluationofitacasapotentialearlyplasmamarkertodifferentiatebetweencriticalandnoncriticalcovid19
AT agudelohiguitanelsoni evaluationofitacasapotentialearlyplasmamarkertodifferentiatebetweencriticalandnoncriticalcovid19
AT bhattacharyaresham evaluationofitacasapotentialearlyplasmamarkertodifferentiatebetweencriticalandnoncriticalcovid19
AT chakrabartyjenniferholter evaluationofitacasapotentialearlyplasmamarkertodifferentiatebetweencriticalandnoncriticalcovid19
AT mukherjeepriyabrata evaluationofitacasapotentialearlyplasmamarkertodifferentiatebetweencriticalandnoncriticalcovid19