Cargando…

Assessment of Perioperative Atelectasis Using Lung Ultrasonography in Patients Undergoing Pneumoperitoneum Surgery in the Trendelenburg Position: Aspects of Differences according to Ventilatory Mode

BACKGROUND: During robotic gynecologic pneumoperitoneum surgery in the Trendelenburg position, aeration loss leads to perioperative atelectasis. Recently developed ventilator mode pressure-controlled ventilation volume-guaranteed (PCV-VG) mode could provide adequate ventilation with lower inspirator...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Youn Young, Han, Jong In, Kang, Bo Kyung, Jeong, Kyungah, Lee, Jong Wha, Kim, Dong Yeon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8728588/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34962110
http://dx.doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e334
_version_ 1784626769945427968
author Lee, Youn Young
Han, Jong In
Kang, Bo Kyung
Jeong, Kyungah
Lee, Jong Wha
Kim, Dong Yeon
author_facet Lee, Youn Young
Han, Jong In
Kang, Bo Kyung
Jeong, Kyungah
Lee, Jong Wha
Kim, Dong Yeon
author_sort Lee, Youn Young
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: During robotic gynecologic pneumoperitoneum surgery in the Trendelenburg position, aeration loss leads to perioperative atelectasis. Recently developed ventilator mode pressure-controlled ventilation volume-guaranteed (PCV-VG) mode could provide adequate ventilation with lower inspiratory pressure compared to volume-controlled ventilation (VCV); we hypothesized that PCV-VG mode may be beneficial in reducing perioperative atelectasis via low tidal volume (V(T)) of 6 mL/kg ventilation during robotic gynecologic pneumoperitoneum surgery in the Trendelenburg position. We applied lung ultrasound score (LUS) for detecting perioperative atelectasis. We aimed to compare perioperative atelectasis between VCV and PCV-VG with a low V(T) of 6 mL/kg during pneumoperitoneum surgery in the Trendelenburg position using LUS. METHODS: Patients scheduled for robotic gynecologic surgery were randomly allocated to the VCV (n = 41) or PCV-VG group (n = 41). LUS, ventilatory, and hemodynamic parameters were evaluated at T1 (before induction), T2 (10 minutes after induction in the supine position), T3 (10 minutes after desufflation of CO(2) in the supine position), and T4 (30 minutes after emergence from anesthesia in the recovery room). RESULTS: Eighty patients (40 with PCV-VG and 40 with VCV) were included. Demographic data showed no significant differences between the groups. The total LUS has changed from baseline to T4, 0.63 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.32, 0.94) to 1.77 (95% CI, 1.42, 2.21) in the VCV group and 0.86 (95% CI, 0.56, 1.16) to 1.43 (95% CI, 1.08, 1.78) in the PCV-VG group (P = 0.170). In both groups, total LUS increased significantly compared to the baseline values. CONCLUSION: Using a low V(T) of 6 mL/kg during pneumoperitoneum surgery in the Trendelenburg position, our study showed no evidence that PCV-VG ventilation was superior to VCV in terms of perioperative atelectasis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Research Information Service Identifier: KCT0006404
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8728588
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87285882022-01-12 Assessment of Perioperative Atelectasis Using Lung Ultrasonography in Patients Undergoing Pneumoperitoneum Surgery in the Trendelenburg Position: Aspects of Differences according to Ventilatory Mode Lee, Youn Young Han, Jong In Kang, Bo Kyung Jeong, Kyungah Lee, Jong Wha Kim, Dong Yeon J Korean Med Sci Original Article BACKGROUND: During robotic gynecologic pneumoperitoneum surgery in the Trendelenburg position, aeration loss leads to perioperative atelectasis. Recently developed ventilator mode pressure-controlled ventilation volume-guaranteed (PCV-VG) mode could provide adequate ventilation with lower inspiratory pressure compared to volume-controlled ventilation (VCV); we hypothesized that PCV-VG mode may be beneficial in reducing perioperative atelectasis via low tidal volume (V(T)) of 6 mL/kg ventilation during robotic gynecologic pneumoperitoneum surgery in the Trendelenburg position. We applied lung ultrasound score (LUS) for detecting perioperative atelectasis. We aimed to compare perioperative atelectasis between VCV and PCV-VG with a low V(T) of 6 mL/kg during pneumoperitoneum surgery in the Trendelenburg position using LUS. METHODS: Patients scheduled for robotic gynecologic surgery were randomly allocated to the VCV (n = 41) or PCV-VG group (n = 41). LUS, ventilatory, and hemodynamic parameters were evaluated at T1 (before induction), T2 (10 minutes after induction in the supine position), T3 (10 minutes after desufflation of CO(2) in the supine position), and T4 (30 minutes after emergence from anesthesia in the recovery room). RESULTS: Eighty patients (40 with PCV-VG and 40 with VCV) were included. Demographic data showed no significant differences between the groups. The total LUS has changed from baseline to T4, 0.63 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.32, 0.94) to 1.77 (95% CI, 1.42, 2.21) in the VCV group and 0.86 (95% CI, 0.56, 1.16) to 1.43 (95% CI, 1.08, 1.78) in the PCV-VG group (P = 0.170). In both groups, total LUS increased significantly compared to the baseline values. CONCLUSION: Using a low V(T) of 6 mL/kg during pneumoperitoneum surgery in the Trendelenburg position, our study showed no evidence that PCV-VG ventilation was superior to VCV in terms of perioperative atelectasis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Research Information Service Identifier: KCT0006404 The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences 2021-11-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8728588/ /pubmed/34962110 http://dx.doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e334 Text en © 2021 The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Lee, Youn Young
Han, Jong In
Kang, Bo Kyung
Jeong, Kyungah
Lee, Jong Wha
Kim, Dong Yeon
Assessment of Perioperative Atelectasis Using Lung Ultrasonography in Patients Undergoing Pneumoperitoneum Surgery in the Trendelenburg Position: Aspects of Differences according to Ventilatory Mode
title Assessment of Perioperative Atelectasis Using Lung Ultrasonography in Patients Undergoing Pneumoperitoneum Surgery in the Trendelenburg Position: Aspects of Differences according to Ventilatory Mode
title_full Assessment of Perioperative Atelectasis Using Lung Ultrasonography in Patients Undergoing Pneumoperitoneum Surgery in the Trendelenburg Position: Aspects of Differences according to Ventilatory Mode
title_fullStr Assessment of Perioperative Atelectasis Using Lung Ultrasonography in Patients Undergoing Pneumoperitoneum Surgery in the Trendelenburg Position: Aspects of Differences according to Ventilatory Mode
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of Perioperative Atelectasis Using Lung Ultrasonography in Patients Undergoing Pneumoperitoneum Surgery in the Trendelenburg Position: Aspects of Differences according to Ventilatory Mode
title_short Assessment of Perioperative Atelectasis Using Lung Ultrasonography in Patients Undergoing Pneumoperitoneum Surgery in the Trendelenburg Position: Aspects of Differences according to Ventilatory Mode
title_sort assessment of perioperative atelectasis using lung ultrasonography in patients undergoing pneumoperitoneum surgery in the trendelenburg position: aspects of differences according to ventilatory mode
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8728588/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34962110
http://dx.doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e334
work_keys_str_mv AT leeyounyoung assessmentofperioperativeatelectasisusinglungultrasonographyinpatientsundergoingpneumoperitoneumsurgeryinthetrendelenburgpositionaspectsofdifferencesaccordingtoventilatorymode
AT hanjongin assessmentofperioperativeatelectasisusinglungultrasonographyinpatientsundergoingpneumoperitoneumsurgeryinthetrendelenburgpositionaspectsofdifferencesaccordingtoventilatorymode
AT kangbokyung assessmentofperioperativeatelectasisusinglungultrasonographyinpatientsundergoingpneumoperitoneumsurgeryinthetrendelenburgpositionaspectsofdifferencesaccordingtoventilatorymode
AT jeongkyungah assessmentofperioperativeatelectasisusinglungultrasonographyinpatientsundergoingpneumoperitoneumsurgeryinthetrendelenburgpositionaspectsofdifferencesaccordingtoventilatorymode
AT leejongwha assessmentofperioperativeatelectasisusinglungultrasonographyinpatientsundergoingpneumoperitoneumsurgeryinthetrendelenburgpositionaspectsofdifferencesaccordingtoventilatorymode
AT kimdongyeon assessmentofperioperativeatelectasisusinglungultrasonographyinpatientsundergoingpneumoperitoneumsurgeryinthetrendelenburgpositionaspectsofdifferencesaccordingtoventilatorymode