Cargando…

Formulating Hypotheses for Different Study Designs

Generating a testable working hypothesis is the first step towards conducting original research. Such research may prove or disprove the proposed hypothesis. Case reports, case series, online surveys and other observational studies, clinical trials, and narrative reviews help to generate hypotheses....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Misra, Durga Prasanna, Gasparyan, Armen Yuri, Zimba, Olena, Yessirkepov, Marlen, Agarwal, Vikas, Kitas, George D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8728594/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34962112
http://dx.doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e338
_version_ 1784626771402948608
author Misra, Durga Prasanna
Gasparyan, Armen Yuri
Zimba, Olena
Yessirkepov, Marlen
Agarwal, Vikas
Kitas, George D.
author_facet Misra, Durga Prasanna
Gasparyan, Armen Yuri
Zimba, Olena
Yessirkepov, Marlen
Agarwal, Vikas
Kitas, George D.
author_sort Misra, Durga Prasanna
collection PubMed
description Generating a testable working hypothesis is the first step towards conducting original research. Such research may prove or disprove the proposed hypothesis. Case reports, case series, online surveys and other observational studies, clinical trials, and narrative reviews help to generate hypotheses. Observational and interventional studies help to test hypotheses. A good hypothesis is usually based on previous evidence-based reports. Hypotheses without evidence-based justification and a priori ideas are not received favourably by the scientific community. Original research to test a hypothesis should be carefully planned to ensure appropriate methodology and adequate statistical power. While hypotheses can challenge conventional thinking and may be controversial, they should not be destructive. A hypothesis should be tested by ethically sound experiments with meaningful ethical and clinical implications. The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has brought into sharp focus numerous hypotheses, some of which were proven (e.g. effectiveness of corticosteroids in those with hypoxia) while others were disproven (e.g. ineffectiveness of hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8728594
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87285942022-01-12 Formulating Hypotheses for Different Study Designs Misra, Durga Prasanna Gasparyan, Armen Yuri Zimba, Olena Yessirkepov, Marlen Agarwal, Vikas Kitas, George D. J Korean Med Sci Review Article Generating a testable working hypothesis is the first step towards conducting original research. Such research may prove or disprove the proposed hypothesis. Case reports, case series, online surveys and other observational studies, clinical trials, and narrative reviews help to generate hypotheses. Observational and interventional studies help to test hypotheses. A good hypothesis is usually based on previous evidence-based reports. Hypotheses without evidence-based justification and a priori ideas are not received favourably by the scientific community. Original research to test a hypothesis should be carefully planned to ensure appropriate methodology and adequate statistical power. While hypotheses can challenge conventional thinking and may be controversial, they should not be destructive. A hypothesis should be tested by ethically sound experiments with meaningful ethical and clinical implications. The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has brought into sharp focus numerous hypotheses, some of which were proven (e.g. effectiveness of corticosteroids in those with hypoxia) while others were disproven (e.g. ineffectiveness of hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin). The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences 2021-11-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8728594/ /pubmed/34962112 http://dx.doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e338 Text en © 2021 The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Misra, Durga Prasanna
Gasparyan, Armen Yuri
Zimba, Olena
Yessirkepov, Marlen
Agarwal, Vikas
Kitas, George D.
Formulating Hypotheses for Different Study Designs
title Formulating Hypotheses for Different Study Designs
title_full Formulating Hypotheses for Different Study Designs
title_fullStr Formulating Hypotheses for Different Study Designs
title_full_unstemmed Formulating Hypotheses for Different Study Designs
title_short Formulating Hypotheses for Different Study Designs
title_sort formulating hypotheses for different study designs
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8728594/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34962112
http://dx.doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e338
work_keys_str_mv AT misradurgaprasanna formulatinghypothesesfordifferentstudydesigns
AT gasparyanarmenyuri formulatinghypothesesfordifferentstudydesigns
AT zimbaolena formulatinghypothesesfordifferentstudydesigns
AT yessirkepovmarlen formulatinghypothesesfordifferentstudydesigns
AT agarwalvikas formulatinghypothesesfordifferentstudydesigns
AT kitasgeorged formulatinghypothesesfordifferentstudydesigns