Cargando…

A Comparison of Antifungal Drugs and Traditional Antiseptic Medication for Otomycosis Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objectives/Hypothesis: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the efficacy of and complications associated with antifungal drugs and traditional antiseptic medication for the treatment of otomycosis. Data Sources: The PubMed, EMBASE, GeenMedical, Cochrane Library, CBM, CNKI, VIP...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wu, Shunyu, Cheng, Yin, Lin, Shunzhang, Liu, Huanhai
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8728675/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35004834
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2021.739360
_version_ 1784626781520658432
author Wu, Shunyu
Cheng, Yin
Lin, Shunzhang
Liu, Huanhai
author_facet Wu, Shunyu
Cheng, Yin
Lin, Shunzhang
Liu, Huanhai
author_sort Wu, Shunyu
collection PubMed
description Objectives/Hypothesis: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the efficacy of and complications associated with antifungal drugs and traditional antiseptic medication for the treatment of otomycosis. Data Sources: The PubMed, EMBASE, GeenMedical, Cochrane Library, CBM, CNKI, VIP and other databases were searched from January 1991 to January 2021. Methods: The systematic literature review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized studies (case-control, cohort, and case series) were included to assess the topical use of antifungal drugs and traditional antiseptic medication in patients with otomycosis. The research subjects were patients who were clinically diagnosed with otomycosis and whose external auditory canal secretions were positive for fungi. Funnel plots were used to detect bias, and the Q test was used to assess heterogeneity. The random-effects model was used for meta-analysis. The t-test was used to assess significance. Results: Of the 324 non-duplicate studies screened, 16 studies met the criteria for full-text review, and 7 were included in the meta-analysis. Four studies reported recovery conditions (P = 0.01). Six common complications after medication use were compared, and there were no significant differences. The authors further conducted subgroup analysis according to complications. The differences in the rates of ear distension (P = 0.007), earache (P = 0.03) and tinnitus (P = 0.003) were statistically significant. Conclusion: The results of this meta-analysis and literature review showed that antifungal drugs and traditional antiseptic medication were effective in relieving symptoms in patients with otomycosis, and the two treatments were associated with different complications. Otolaryngologists have the option to use one medication or a combination of two drugs on the basis of the condition. Future research in this area should include RCTs with long-term follow-up to guide the development of otomycosis guidelines to overcome some of the weaknesses found in the literature. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/#myprospero.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8728675
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87286752022-01-06 A Comparison of Antifungal Drugs and Traditional Antiseptic Medication for Otomycosis Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Wu, Shunyu Cheng, Yin Lin, Shunzhang Liu, Huanhai Front Surg Surgery Objectives/Hypothesis: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the efficacy of and complications associated with antifungal drugs and traditional antiseptic medication for the treatment of otomycosis. Data Sources: The PubMed, EMBASE, GeenMedical, Cochrane Library, CBM, CNKI, VIP and other databases were searched from January 1991 to January 2021. Methods: The systematic literature review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized studies (case-control, cohort, and case series) were included to assess the topical use of antifungal drugs and traditional antiseptic medication in patients with otomycosis. The research subjects were patients who were clinically diagnosed with otomycosis and whose external auditory canal secretions were positive for fungi. Funnel plots were used to detect bias, and the Q test was used to assess heterogeneity. The random-effects model was used for meta-analysis. The t-test was used to assess significance. Results: Of the 324 non-duplicate studies screened, 16 studies met the criteria for full-text review, and 7 were included in the meta-analysis. Four studies reported recovery conditions (P = 0.01). Six common complications after medication use were compared, and there were no significant differences. The authors further conducted subgroup analysis according to complications. The differences in the rates of ear distension (P = 0.007), earache (P = 0.03) and tinnitus (P = 0.003) were statistically significant. Conclusion: The results of this meta-analysis and literature review showed that antifungal drugs and traditional antiseptic medication were effective in relieving symptoms in patients with otomycosis, and the two treatments were associated with different complications. Otolaryngologists have the option to use one medication or a combination of two drugs on the basis of the condition. Future research in this area should include RCTs with long-term follow-up to guide the development of otomycosis guidelines to overcome some of the weaknesses found in the literature. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/#myprospero. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-12-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8728675/ /pubmed/35004834 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2021.739360 Text en Copyright © 2021 Wu, Cheng, Lin and Liu. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Surgery
Wu, Shunyu
Cheng, Yin
Lin, Shunzhang
Liu, Huanhai
A Comparison of Antifungal Drugs and Traditional Antiseptic Medication for Otomycosis Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title A Comparison of Antifungal Drugs and Traditional Antiseptic Medication for Otomycosis Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full A Comparison of Antifungal Drugs and Traditional Antiseptic Medication for Otomycosis Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr A Comparison of Antifungal Drugs and Traditional Antiseptic Medication for Otomycosis Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison of Antifungal Drugs and Traditional Antiseptic Medication for Otomycosis Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short A Comparison of Antifungal Drugs and Traditional Antiseptic Medication for Otomycosis Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort comparison of antifungal drugs and traditional antiseptic medication for otomycosis treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8728675/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35004834
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2021.739360
work_keys_str_mv AT wushunyu acomparisonofantifungaldrugsandtraditionalantisepticmedicationforotomycosistreatmentasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT chengyin acomparisonofantifungaldrugsandtraditionalantisepticmedicationforotomycosistreatmentasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT linshunzhang acomparisonofantifungaldrugsandtraditionalantisepticmedicationforotomycosistreatmentasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liuhuanhai acomparisonofantifungaldrugsandtraditionalantisepticmedicationforotomycosistreatmentasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wushunyu comparisonofantifungaldrugsandtraditionalantisepticmedicationforotomycosistreatmentasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT chengyin comparisonofantifungaldrugsandtraditionalantisepticmedicationforotomycosistreatmentasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT linshunzhang comparisonofantifungaldrugsandtraditionalantisepticmedicationforotomycosistreatmentasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liuhuanhai comparisonofantifungaldrugsandtraditionalantisepticmedicationforotomycosistreatmentasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis