Cargando…

Influence of coracoglenoid space on scapular neck fracture stability: biomechanical study

BACKGROUND: The anatomical variation of the coracoglenoid space has the potential to influence the stability of scapular neck fractures. This paper aimed to investigate the mechanical mechanism underlying the influence of different coracoglenoid space types on scapular neck fractures by morphometric...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Junfeng, Zhang, Wei, Pang, Gang, Meng, Qingling, Zhu, Youyu, Deng, Xuefei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8728935/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34983487
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04974-3
_version_ 1784626834398248960
author Chen, Junfeng
Zhang, Wei
Pang, Gang
Meng, Qingling
Zhu, Youyu
Deng, Xuefei
author_facet Chen, Junfeng
Zhang, Wei
Pang, Gang
Meng, Qingling
Zhu, Youyu
Deng, Xuefei
author_sort Chen, Junfeng
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The anatomical variation of the coracoglenoid space has the potential to influence the stability of scapular neck fractures. This paper aimed to investigate the mechanical mechanism underlying the influence of different coracoglenoid space types on scapular neck fractures by morphometric analysis and biomechanical experiments. METHODS: The morphology of 68 dried scapulae (left: 36; right: 32) was studied. Two variables, the length of the coracoglenoid distance (CGD) and the coracoglenoid notch (CGN), were measured. The distribution of CGN/CGD × 100% was used to identify the morphology of the coracoglenoid space. Each specimen was tested for failure under static axial compression loading. The average failure load, stiffness, and energy were calculated. RESULTS: Two coracoglenoid space types were identified. The incidence of Type I (‘‘hook’’ shape) was 53%, and that of Type II (‘‘square bracket’’ shape) was 47%. The CGD and CGN were significantly higher for type I than type II (13.81 ± 0.74 mm vs. 11.50 ± 1.03 mm, P < 0.05; 4.74 ± 0.45 mm vs. 2.61 ± 0.45 mm, P < 0.05). The average maximum failure load of the two types was 1270.82 ± 318.85 N and 1529.18 ± 467.29 N, respectively (P = 0.011). The stiffness and energy were significantly higher for type II than type I (896.75 ± 281.14 N/mm vs. 692.91 ± 217.95 N/mm, P = 0.001; 2100.38 ± 649.54 N × mm vs. 1712.71 ± 626.02 N × mm, P = 0.015). CONCLUSIONS: There was great interindividual variation in the anatomical morphology of the coracoglenoid space. Type I (hook-like) spaces bore lower forces, were less stiff, and bore less energy, which may constitute an anatomical predisposition to scapular neck fractures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8728935
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87289352022-01-06 Influence of coracoglenoid space on scapular neck fracture stability: biomechanical study Chen, Junfeng Zhang, Wei Pang, Gang Meng, Qingling Zhu, Youyu Deng, Xuefei BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: The anatomical variation of the coracoglenoid space has the potential to influence the stability of scapular neck fractures. This paper aimed to investigate the mechanical mechanism underlying the influence of different coracoglenoid space types on scapular neck fractures by morphometric analysis and biomechanical experiments. METHODS: The morphology of 68 dried scapulae (left: 36; right: 32) was studied. Two variables, the length of the coracoglenoid distance (CGD) and the coracoglenoid notch (CGN), were measured. The distribution of CGN/CGD × 100% was used to identify the morphology of the coracoglenoid space. Each specimen was tested for failure under static axial compression loading. The average failure load, stiffness, and energy were calculated. RESULTS: Two coracoglenoid space types were identified. The incidence of Type I (‘‘hook’’ shape) was 53%, and that of Type II (‘‘square bracket’’ shape) was 47%. The CGD and CGN were significantly higher for type I than type II (13.81 ± 0.74 mm vs. 11.50 ± 1.03 mm, P < 0.05; 4.74 ± 0.45 mm vs. 2.61 ± 0.45 mm, P < 0.05). The average maximum failure load of the two types was 1270.82 ± 318.85 N and 1529.18 ± 467.29 N, respectively (P = 0.011). The stiffness and energy were significantly higher for type II than type I (896.75 ± 281.14 N/mm vs. 692.91 ± 217.95 N/mm, P = 0.001; 2100.38 ± 649.54 N × mm vs. 1712.71 ± 626.02 N × mm, P = 0.015). CONCLUSIONS: There was great interindividual variation in the anatomical morphology of the coracoglenoid space. Type I (hook-like) spaces bore lower forces, were less stiff, and bore less energy, which may constitute an anatomical predisposition to scapular neck fractures. BioMed Central 2022-01-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8728935/ /pubmed/34983487 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04974-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Chen, Junfeng
Zhang, Wei
Pang, Gang
Meng, Qingling
Zhu, Youyu
Deng, Xuefei
Influence of coracoglenoid space on scapular neck fracture stability: biomechanical study
title Influence of coracoglenoid space on scapular neck fracture stability: biomechanical study
title_full Influence of coracoglenoid space on scapular neck fracture stability: biomechanical study
title_fullStr Influence of coracoglenoid space on scapular neck fracture stability: biomechanical study
title_full_unstemmed Influence of coracoglenoid space on scapular neck fracture stability: biomechanical study
title_short Influence of coracoglenoid space on scapular neck fracture stability: biomechanical study
title_sort influence of coracoglenoid space on scapular neck fracture stability: biomechanical study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8728935/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34983487
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04974-3
work_keys_str_mv AT chenjunfeng influenceofcoracoglenoidspaceonscapularneckfracturestabilitybiomechanicalstudy
AT zhangwei influenceofcoracoglenoidspaceonscapularneckfracturestabilitybiomechanicalstudy
AT panggang influenceofcoracoglenoidspaceonscapularneckfracturestabilitybiomechanicalstudy
AT mengqingling influenceofcoracoglenoidspaceonscapularneckfracturestabilitybiomechanicalstudy
AT zhuyouyu influenceofcoracoglenoidspaceonscapularneckfracturestabilitybiomechanicalstudy
AT dengxuefei influenceofcoracoglenoidspaceonscapularneckfracturestabilitybiomechanicalstudy