Cargando…

A Telemedicine-Guided Self-Collection Approach for PCR-Based SARS-CoV-2 Testing: Comparative Study

BACKGROUND: Large-scale, polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based SARS-CoV-2 testing is expensive, resource intensive, and time consuming. A self-collection approach is a probable alternative; however, its feasibility, cost, and ability to prevent infections need to be evaluated. OBJECTIVE: This study...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Würstle, Silvia, Erber, Johanna, Hanselmann, Michael, Hoffmann, Dieter, Werfel, Stanislas, Hering, Svenja, Weidlich, Simon, Schneider, Jochen, Franke, Ralf, Maier, Michael, Henkel, Andreas G, Schmid, Roland M, Protzer, Ulrike, Laxy, Michael, Spinner, Christoph D
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8729873/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34803022
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/32564
_version_ 1784627015268171776
author Würstle, Silvia
Erber, Johanna
Hanselmann, Michael
Hoffmann, Dieter
Werfel, Stanislas
Hering, Svenja
Weidlich, Simon
Schneider, Jochen
Franke, Ralf
Maier, Michael
Henkel, Andreas G
Schmid, Roland M
Protzer, Ulrike
Laxy, Michael
Spinner, Christoph D
author_facet Würstle, Silvia
Erber, Johanna
Hanselmann, Michael
Hoffmann, Dieter
Werfel, Stanislas
Hering, Svenja
Weidlich, Simon
Schneider, Jochen
Franke, Ralf
Maier, Michael
Henkel, Andreas G
Schmid, Roland M
Protzer, Ulrike
Laxy, Michael
Spinner, Christoph D
author_sort Würstle, Silvia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Large-scale, polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based SARS-CoV-2 testing is expensive, resource intensive, and time consuming. A self-collection approach is a probable alternative; however, its feasibility, cost, and ability to prevent infections need to be evaluated. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to compare an innovative self-collection approach with a regular SARS-CoV-2 testing strategy in a large European industrial manufacturing site. METHODS: The feasibility of a telemedicine-guided PCR-based self-collection approach was assessed for 150 employees (intervention group) and compared with a regular SARS-CoV-2 testing approach used for 143 employees (control group). Acceptance, ergonomics, and efficacy were evaluated using a software application. A simulation model was implemented to evaluate the effectiveness. An interactive R shiny app was created to enable customized simulations. RESULTS: The test results were successfully communicated to and interpreted without uncertainty by 76% (114/150) and 76.9% (110/143) of the participants in the intervention and control groups, respectively (P=.96). The ratings for acceptability, ergonomics, and efficacy among intervention group participants were noninferior when compared to those among control group participants (acceptability: 71.6% vs 37.6%; ergonomics: 88.1% vs 74.5%; efficacy: 86.4% vs 77.5%). The self-collection approach was found to be less time consuming (23 min vs 38 min; P<.001). The simulation model indicated that both testing approaches reduce the risk of infection, and the self-collection approach tends to be slightly less effective owing to its lower sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: The self-collection approach for SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis was found to be technically feasible and well rated in terms of acceptance, ergonomics, and efficacy. The simulation model facilitates the evaluation of test effectiveness; nonetheless, considering context specificity, appropriate adaptation by companies is required.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8729873
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87298732022-01-21 A Telemedicine-Guided Self-Collection Approach for PCR-Based SARS-CoV-2 Testing: Comparative Study Würstle, Silvia Erber, Johanna Hanselmann, Michael Hoffmann, Dieter Werfel, Stanislas Hering, Svenja Weidlich, Simon Schneider, Jochen Franke, Ralf Maier, Michael Henkel, Andreas G Schmid, Roland M Protzer, Ulrike Laxy, Michael Spinner, Christoph D JMIR Form Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: Large-scale, polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based SARS-CoV-2 testing is expensive, resource intensive, and time consuming. A self-collection approach is a probable alternative; however, its feasibility, cost, and ability to prevent infections need to be evaluated. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to compare an innovative self-collection approach with a regular SARS-CoV-2 testing strategy in a large European industrial manufacturing site. METHODS: The feasibility of a telemedicine-guided PCR-based self-collection approach was assessed for 150 employees (intervention group) and compared with a regular SARS-CoV-2 testing approach used for 143 employees (control group). Acceptance, ergonomics, and efficacy were evaluated using a software application. A simulation model was implemented to evaluate the effectiveness. An interactive R shiny app was created to enable customized simulations. RESULTS: The test results were successfully communicated to and interpreted without uncertainty by 76% (114/150) and 76.9% (110/143) of the participants in the intervention and control groups, respectively (P=.96). The ratings for acceptability, ergonomics, and efficacy among intervention group participants were noninferior when compared to those among control group participants (acceptability: 71.6% vs 37.6%; ergonomics: 88.1% vs 74.5%; efficacy: 86.4% vs 77.5%). The self-collection approach was found to be less time consuming (23 min vs 38 min; P<.001). The simulation model indicated that both testing approaches reduce the risk of infection, and the self-collection approach tends to be slightly less effective owing to its lower sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: The self-collection approach for SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis was found to be technically feasible and well rated in terms of acceptance, ergonomics, and efficacy. The simulation model facilitates the evaluation of test effectiveness; nonetheless, considering context specificity, appropriate adaptation by companies is required. JMIR Publications 2022-01-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8729873/ /pubmed/34803022 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/32564 Text en ©Silvia Würstle, Johanna Erber, Michael Hanselmann, Dieter Hoffmann, Stanislas Werfel, Svenja Hering, Simon Weidlich, Jochen Schneider, Ralf Franke, Michael Maier, Andreas G Henkel, Roland M Schmid, Ulrike Protzer, Michael Laxy, Christoph D Spinner. Originally published in JMIR Formative Research (https://formative.jmir.org), 04.01.2022. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Formative Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://formative.jmir.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Würstle, Silvia
Erber, Johanna
Hanselmann, Michael
Hoffmann, Dieter
Werfel, Stanislas
Hering, Svenja
Weidlich, Simon
Schneider, Jochen
Franke, Ralf
Maier, Michael
Henkel, Andreas G
Schmid, Roland M
Protzer, Ulrike
Laxy, Michael
Spinner, Christoph D
A Telemedicine-Guided Self-Collection Approach for PCR-Based SARS-CoV-2 Testing: Comparative Study
title A Telemedicine-Guided Self-Collection Approach for PCR-Based SARS-CoV-2 Testing: Comparative Study
title_full A Telemedicine-Guided Self-Collection Approach for PCR-Based SARS-CoV-2 Testing: Comparative Study
title_fullStr A Telemedicine-Guided Self-Collection Approach for PCR-Based SARS-CoV-2 Testing: Comparative Study
title_full_unstemmed A Telemedicine-Guided Self-Collection Approach for PCR-Based SARS-CoV-2 Testing: Comparative Study
title_short A Telemedicine-Guided Self-Collection Approach for PCR-Based SARS-CoV-2 Testing: Comparative Study
title_sort telemedicine-guided self-collection approach for pcr-based sars-cov-2 testing: comparative study
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8729873/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34803022
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/32564
work_keys_str_mv AT wurstlesilvia atelemedicineguidedselfcollectionapproachforpcrbasedsarscov2testingcomparativestudy
AT erberjohanna atelemedicineguidedselfcollectionapproachforpcrbasedsarscov2testingcomparativestudy
AT hanselmannmichael atelemedicineguidedselfcollectionapproachforpcrbasedsarscov2testingcomparativestudy
AT hoffmanndieter atelemedicineguidedselfcollectionapproachforpcrbasedsarscov2testingcomparativestudy
AT werfelstanislas atelemedicineguidedselfcollectionapproachforpcrbasedsarscov2testingcomparativestudy
AT heringsvenja atelemedicineguidedselfcollectionapproachforpcrbasedsarscov2testingcomparativestudy
AT weidlichsimon atelemedicineguidedselfcollectionapproachforpcrbasedsarscov2testingcomparativestudy
AT schneiderjochen atelemedicineguidedselfcollectionapproachforpcrbasedsarscov2testingcomparativestudy
AT frankeralf atelemedicineguidedselfcollectionapproachforpcrbasedsarscov2testingcomparativestudy
AT maiermichael atelemedicineguidedselfcollectionapproachforpcrbasedsarscov2testingcomparativestudy
AT henkelandreasg atelemedicineguidedselfcollectionapproachforpcrbasedsarscov2testingcomparativestudy
AT schmidrolandm atelemedicineguidedselfcollectionapproachforpcrbasedsarscov2testingcomparativestudy
AT protzerulrike atelemedicineguidedselfcollectionapproachforpcrbasedsarscov2testingcomparativestudy
AT laxymichael atelemedicineguidedselfcollectionapproachforpcrbasedsarscov2testingcomparativestudy
AT spinnerchristophd atelemedicineguidedselfcollectionapproachforpcrbasedsarscov2testingcomparativestudy
AT wurstlesilvia telemedicineguidedselfcollectionapproachforpcrbasedsarscov2testingcomparativestudy
AT erberjohanna telemedicineguidedselfcollectionapproachforpcrbasedsarscov2testingcomparativestudy
AT hanselmannmichael telemedicineguidedselfcollectionapproachforpcrbasedsarscov2testingcomparativestudy
AT hoffmanndieter telemedicineguidedselfcollectionapproachforpcrbasedsarscov2testingcomparativestudy
AT werfelstanislas telemedicineguidedselfcollectionapproachforpcrbasedsarscov2testingcomparativestudy
AT heringsvenja telemedicineguidedselfcollectionapproachforpcrbasedsarscov2testingcomparativestudy
AT weidlichsimon telemedicineguidedselfcollectionapproachforpcrbasedsarscov2testingcomparativestudy
AT schneiderjochen telemedicineguidedselfcollectionapproachforpcrbasedsarscov2testingcomparativestudy
AT frankeralf telemedicineguidedselfcollectionapproachforpcrbasedsarscov2testingcomparativestudy
AT maiermichael telemedicineguidedselfcollectionapproachforpcrbasedsarscov2testingcomparativestudy
AT henkelandreasg telemedicineguidedselfcollectionapproachforpcrbasedsarscov2testingcomparativestudy
AT schmidrolandm telemedicineguidedselfcollectionapproachforpcrbasedsarscov2testingcomparativestudy
AT protzerulrike telemedicineguidedselfcollectionapproachforpcrbasedsarscov2testingcomparativestudy
AT laxymichael telemedicineguidedselfcollectionapproachforpcrbasedsarscov2testingcomparativestudy
AT spinnerchristophd telemedicineguidedselfcollectionapproachforpcrbasedsarscov2testingcomparativestudy