Cargando…
An exploratory assessment of the legislative framework for combating counterfeit medicines in South Africa
BACKGROUND: Substandard and Falsified (SF) medical products are a growing global concern. They harm the individual patient, the healthcare system and the economy. The World Health Organisation (WHO) has highlighted contributing factors globally: insufficient national medicine regulation, poor enforc...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8730303/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34986899 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40545-021-00387-8 |
_version_ | 1784627111759183872 |
---|---|
author | Moshoeshoe, R. J. Enslin, G. M. Katerere, D. R. |
author_facet | Moshoeshoe, R. J. Enslin, G. M. Katerere, D. R. |
author_sort | Moshoeshoe, R. J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Substandard and Falsified (SF) medical products are a growing global concern. They harm the individual patient, the healthcare system and the economy. The World Health Organisation (WHO) has highlighted contributing factors globally: insufficient national medicine regulation, poor enforcement of existing legislation, weak stakeholder collaboration and the rise of novel viruses, such as the COVID-19. The study aimed to assess the legislative and policy framework and institutional relationships governing pharmaceuticals and anti-counterfeiting strategies. METHODS: The study was explorative and consisted of two phases. The first phase was between 2016 and 2017. It looked at document analysis (annual reports and press releases from 2011 to 2016) from government institutions involved in medicines regulation and law enforcement for SF seizure reports between 2004 and 2017. The second phase was between 2016 and 2018 through in-depth semi-structured interviews (seven in total) with selected stakeholders. RESULTS: First Phase—the data collected and reported by various departments was sporadic and did not always correlate for the same periods indicating, a lack of a central reporting system and stakeholder collaboration. In South Africa, counterfeiting of medicines mainly involves the smuggling of non-registered goods. The most common counterfeit items were painkillers, herbal teas, herbal ointments, while some were medical devices. Furthermore, Customs identified South Africa as a transhipment point for SF infiltration to neighbouring countries with less robust regulatory systems. Second phase—interview transcripts were analysed by thematic coding. These were identified as the adequacy of legislation, institutional capacity, enforcement and post-market surveillance, stakeholder collaboration and information sharing, and public education and awareness. CONCLUSION: Document analysis and interviews indicate that South Africa already has a national drug policy and legislative framework consistent with international law. However, there is no specific pharmaceutical legislation addressing the counterfeiting of medicines. Law enforcement has also been complicated by poor stakeholder engagement and information sharing. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40545-021-00387-8. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8730303 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87303032022-01-06 An exploratory assessment of the legislative framework for combating counterfeit medicines in South Africa Moshoeshoe, R. J. Enslin, G. M. Katerere, D. R. J Pharm Policy Pract Research BACKGROUND: Substandard and Falsified (SF) medical products are a growing global concern. They harm the individual patient, the healthcare system and the economy. The World Health Organisation (WHO) has highlighted contributing factors globally: insufficient national medicine regulation, poor enforcement of existing legislation, weak stakeholder collaboration and the rise of novel viruses, such as the COVID-19. The study aimed to assess the legislative and policy framework and institutional relationships governing pharmaceuticals and anti-counterfeiting strategies. METHODS: The study was explorative and consisted of two phases. The first phase was between 2016 and 2017. It looked at document analysis (annual reports and press releases from 2011 to 2016) from government institutions involved in medicines regulation and law enforcement for SF seizure reports between 2004 and 2017. The second phase was between 2016 and 2018 through in-depth semi-structured interviews (seven in total) with selected stakeholders. RESULTS: First Phase—the data collected and reported by various departments was sporadic and did not always correlate for the same periods indicating, a lack of a central reporting system and stakeholder collaboration. In South Africa, counterfeiting of medicines mainly involves the smuggling of non-registered goods. The most common counterfeit items were painkillers, herbal teas, herbal ointments, while some were medical devices. Furthermore, Customs identified South Africa as a transhipment point for SF infiltration to neighbouring countries with less robust regulatory systems. Second phase—interview transcripts were analysed by thematic coding. These were identified as the adequacy of legislation, institutional capacity, enforcement and post-market surveillance, stakeholder collaboration and information sharing, and public education and awareness. CONCLUSION: Document analysis and interviews indicate that South Africa already has a national drug policy and legislative framework consistent with international law. However, there is no specific pharmaceutical legislation addressing the counterfeiting of medicines. Law enforcement has also been complicated by poor stakeholder engagement and information sharing. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40545-021-00387-8. BioMed Central 2022-01-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8730303/ /pubmed/34986899 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40545-021-00387-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Moshoeshoe, R. J. Enslin, G. M. Katerere, D. R. An exploratory assessment of the legislative framework for combating counterfeit medicines in South Africa |
title | An exploratory assessment of the legislative framework for combating counterfeit medicines in South Africa |
title_full | An exploratory assessment of the legislative framework for combating counterfeit medicines in South Africa |
title_fullStr | An exploratory assessment of the legislative framework for combating counterfeit medicines in South Africa |
title_full_unstemmed | An exploratory assessment of the legislative framework for combating counterfeit medicines in South Africa |
title_short | An exploratory assessment of the legislative framework for combating counterfeit medicines in South Africa |
title_sort | exploratory assessment of the legislative framework for combating counterfeit medicines in south africa |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8730303/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34986899 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40545-021-00387-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT moshoeshoerj anexploratoryassessmentofthelegislativeframeworkforcombatingcounterfeitmedicinesinsouthafrica AT enslingm anexploratoryassessmentofthelegislativeframeworkforcombatingcounterfeitmedicinesinsouthafrica AT katereredr anexploratoryassessmentofthelegislativeframeworkforcombatingcounterfeitmedicinesinsouthafrica AT moshoeshoerj exploratoryassessmentofthelegislativeframeworkforcombatingcounterfeitmedicinesinsouthafrica AT enslingm exploratoryassessmentofthelegislativeframeworkforcombatingcounterfeitmedicinesinsouthafrica AT katereredr exploratoryassessmentofthelegislativeframeworkforcombatingcounterfeitmedicinesinsouthafrica |