Cargando…

“Liking” as an early and editable draft of long-run affective value

Psychological and neural distinctions between the technical concepts of “liking” and “wanting” pose important problems for motivated choice for goods. Why could we “want” something that we do not “like,” or “like” something but be unwilling to exert effort to acquire it? Here, we suggest a framework...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Dayan, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8730425/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34986138
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001476
_version_ 1784627134846730240
author Dayan, Peter
author_facet Dayan, Peter
author_sort Dayan, Peter
collection PubMed
description Psychological and neural distinctions between the technical concepts of “liking” and “wanting” pose important problems for motivated choice for goods. Why could we “want” something that we do not “like,” or “like” something but be unwilling to exert effort to acquire it? Here, we suggest a framework for answering these questions through the medium of reinforcement learning. We consider “liking” to provide immediate, but preliminary and ultimately cancellable, information about the true, long-run worth of a good. Such initial estimates, viewed through the lens of what is known as potential-based shaping, help solve the temporally complex learning problems faced by animals.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8730425
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87304252022-01-06 “Liking” as an early and editable draft of long-run affective value Dayan, Peter PLoS Biol Essay Psychological and neural distinctions between the technical concepts of “liking” and “wanting” pose important problems for motivated choice for goods. Why could we “want” something that we do not “like,” or “like” something but be unwilling to exert effort to acquire it? Here, we suggest a framework for answering these questions through the medium of reinforcement learning. We consider “liking” to provide immediate, but preliminary and ultimately cancellable, information about the true, long-run worth of a good. Such initial estimates, viewed through the lens of what is known as potential-based shaping, help solve the temporally complex learning problems faced by animals. Public Library of Science 2022-01-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8730425/ /pubmed/34986138 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001476 Text en © 2022 Peter Dayan https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Essay
Dayan, Peter
“Liking” as an early and editable draft of long-run affective value
title “Liking” as an early and editable draft of long-run affective value
title_full “Liking” as an early and editable draft of long-run affective value
title_fullStr “Liking” as an early and editable draft of long-run affective value
title_full_unstemmed “Liking” as an early and editable draft of long-run affective value
title_short “Liking” as an early and editable draft of long-run affective value
title_sort “liking” as an early and editable draft of long-run affective value
topic Essay
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8730425/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34986138
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001476
work_keys_str_mv AT dayanpeter likingasanearlyandeditabledraftoflongrunaffectivevalue