Cargando…

The Clamping of End-Tidal Carbon Dioxide Does Not Influence Cognitive Function Performance During Moderate Hyperthermia With or Without Skin Temperature Manipulation

Increases in body temperature from heat stress (i.e., hyperthermia) generally impairs cognitive function across a range of domains and complexities, but the relative contribution from skin versus core temperature changes remains unclear. Hyperthermia also elicits a hyperventilatory response that dec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schultz Martins, Ricardo, Wallace, Phillip J., Steele, Scott W., Scott, Jake S., Taber, Michael J., Hartley, Geoffrey L., Cheung, Stephen S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8730541/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35002880
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.788027
_version_ 1784627154145771520
author Schultz Martins, Ricardo
Wallace, Phillip J.
Steele, Scott W.
Scott, Jake S.
Taber, Michael J.
Hartley, Geoffrey L.
Cheung, Stephen S.
author_facet Schultz Martins, Ricardo
Wallace, Phillip J.
Steele, Scott W.
Scott, Jake S.
Taber, Michael J.
Hartley, Geoffrey L.
Cheung, Stephen S.
author_sort Schultz Martins, Ricardo
collection PubMed
description Increases in body temperature from heat stress (i.e., hyperthermia) generally impairs cognitive function across a range of domains and complexities, but the relative contribution from skin versus core temperature changes remains unclear. Hyperthermia also elicits a hyperventilatory response that decreases the partial pressure of end-tidal carbon dioxide (P(et)CO(2)) and subsequently cerebral blood flow that may influence cognitive function. We studied the role of skin and core temperature along with P(et)CO(2) on cognitive function across a range of domains. Eleven males completed a randomized, single-blinded protocol consisting of poikilocapnia (POIKI, no P(et)CO(2) control) or isocapnia (ISO, P(et)CO(2) maintained at baseline levels) during passive heating using a water-perfused suit (water temperature ~ 49°C) while middle cerebral artery velocity (MCA(v)) was measured continuously as an index of cerebral blood flow. Cognitive testing was completed at baseline, neutral core-hot skin (37.0 ± 0.2°C-37.4 ± 0.3°C), hot core-hot skin (38.6 ± 0.3°C-38.7 ± 0.2°C), and hot core-cooled skin (38.5 ± 0.3°C-34.7 ± 0.6°C). The cognitive test battery consisted of a detection task (psychomotor processing), 2-back task (working memory), set-shifting and Groton Maze Learning Task (executive function). At hot core-hot skin, poikilocapnia led to significant (both p < 0.05) decreases in P(et)CO(2) (∆−21%) and MCA(v) (∆−26%) from baseline, while isocapnia clamped P(et)CO(2) (∆ + 4% from baseline) leading to a significantly (p = 0.023) higher MCA(v) (∆−18% from baseline) compared to poikilocapnia. There were no significant differences in errors made on any task (all p > 0.05) irrespective of skin temperature or P(et)CO(2) manipulation. We conclude that neither skin temperature nor P(et)CO(2) maintenance significantly alter cognitive function during passive hyperthermia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8730541
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87305412022-01-06 The Clamping of End-Tidal Carbon Dioxide Does Not Influence Cognitive Function Performance During Moderate Hyperthermia With or Without Skin Temperature Manipulation Schultz Martins, Ricardo Wallace, Phillip J. Steele, Scott W. Scott, Jake S. Taber, Michael J. Hartley, Geoffrey L. Cheung, Stephen S. Front Psychol Psychology Increases in body temperature from heat stress (i.e., hyperthermia) generally impairs cognitive function across a range of domains and complexities, but the relative contribution from skin versus core temperature changes remains unclear. Hyperthermia also elicits a hyperventilatory response that decreases the partial pressure of end-tidal carbon dioxide (P(et)CO(2)) and subsequently cerebral blood flow that may influence cognitive function. We studied the role of skin and core temperature along with P(et)CO(2) on cognitive function across a range of domains. Eleven males completed a randomized, single-blinded protocol consisting of poikilocapnia (POIKI, no P(et)CO(2) control) or isocapnia (ISO, P(et)CO(2) maintained at baseline levels) during passive heating using a water-perfused suit (water temperature ~ 49°C) while middle cerebral artery velocity (MCA(v)) was measured continuously as an index of cerebral blood flow. Cognitive testing was completed at baseline, neutral core-hot skin (37.0 ± 0.2°C-37.4 ± 0.3°C), hot core-hot skin (38.6 ± 0.3°C-38.7 ± 0.2°C), and hot core-cooled skin (38.5 ± 0.3°C-34.7 ± 0.6°C). The cognitive test battery consisted of a detection task (psychomotor processing), 2-back task (working memory), set-shifting and Groton Maze Learning Task (executive function). At hot core-hot skin, poikilocapnia led to significant (both p < 0.05) decreases in P(et)CO(2) (∆−21%) and MCA(v) (∆−26%) from baseline, while isocapnia clamped P(et)CO(2) (∆ + 4% from baseline) leading to a significantly (p = 0.023) higher MCA(v) (∆−18% from baseline) compared to poikilocapnia. There were no significant differences in errors made on any task (all p > 0.05) irrespective of skin temperature or P(et)CO(2) manipulation. We conclude that neither skin temperature nor P(et)CO(2) maintenance significantly alter cognitive function during passive hyperthermia. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-12-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8730541/ /pubmed/35002880 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.788027 Text en Copyright © 2021 Schultz Martins, Wallace, Steele, Scott, Taber, Hartley and Cheung. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Schultz Martins, Ricardo
Wallace, Phillip J.
Steele, Scott W.
Scott, Jake S.
Taber, Michael J.
Hartley, Geoffrey L.
Cheung, Stephen S.
The Clamping of End-Tidal Carbon Dioxide Does Not Influence Cognitive Function Performance During Moderate Hyperthermia With or Without Skin Temperature Manipulation
title The Clamping of End-Tidal Carbon Dioxide Does Not Influence Cognitive Function Performance During Moderate Hyperthermia With or Without Skin Temperature Manipulation
title_full The Clamping of End-Tidal Carbon Dioxide Does Not Influence Cognitive Function Performance During Moderate Hyperthermia With or Without Skin Temperature Manipulation
title_fullStr The Clamping of End-Tidal Carbon Dioxide Does Not Influence Cognitive Function Performance During Moderate Hyperthermia With or Without Skin Temperature Manipulation
title_full_unstemmed The Clamping of End-Tidal Carbon Dioxide Does Not Influence Cognitive Function Performance During Moderate Hyperthermia With or Without Skin Temperature Manipulation
title_short The Clamping of End-Tidal Carbon Dioxide Does Not Influence Cognitive Function Performance During Moderate Hyperthermia With or Without Skin Temperature Manipulation
title_sort clamping of end-tidal carbon dioxide does not influence cognitive function performance during moderate hyperthermia with or without skin temperature manipulation
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8730541/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35002880
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.788027
work_keys_str_mv AT schultzmartinsricardo theclampingofendtidalcarbondioxidedoesnotinfluencecognitivefunctionperformanceduringmoderatehyperthermiawithorwithoutskintemperaturemanipulation
AT wallacephillipj theclampingofendtidalcarbondioxidedoesnotinfluencecognitivefunctionperformanceduringmoderatehyperthermiawithorwithoutskintemperaturemanipulation
AT steelescottw theclampingofendtidalcarbondioxidedoesnotinfluencecognitivefunctionperformanceduringmoderatehyperthermiawithorwithoutskintemperaturemanipulation
AT scottjakes theclampingofendtidalcarbondioxidedoesnotinfluencecognitivefunctionperformanceduringmoderatehyperthermiawithorwithoutskintemperaturemanipulation
AT tabermichaelj theclampingofendtidalcarbondioxidedoesnotinfluencecognitivefunctionperformanceduringmoderatehyperthermiawithorwithoutskintemperaturemanipulation
AT hartleygeoffreyl theclampingofendtidalcarbondioxidedoesnotinfluencecognitivefunctionperformanceduringmoderatehyperthermiawithorwithoutskintemperaturemanipulation
AT cheungstephens theclampingofendtidalcarbondioxidedoesnotinfluencecognitivefunctionperformanceduringmoderatehyperthermiawithorwithoutskintemperaturemanipulation
AT schultzmartinsricardo clampingofendtidalcarbondioxidedoesnotinfluencecognitivefunctionperformanceduringmoderatehyperthermiawithorwithoutskintemperaturemanipulation
AT wallacephillipj clampingofendtidalcarbondioxidedoesnotinfluencecognitivefunctionperformanceduringmoderatehyperthermiawithorwithoutskintemperaturemanipulation
AT steelescottw clampingofendtidalcarbondioxidedoesnotinfluencecognitivefunctionperformanceduringmoderatehyperthermiawithorwithoutskintemperaturemanipulation
AT scottjakes clampingofendtidalcarbondioxidedoesnotinfluencecognitivefunctionperformanceduringmoderatehyperthermiawithorwithoutskintemperaturemanipulation
AT tabermichaelj clampingofendtidalcarbondioxidedoesnotinfluencecognitivefunctionperformanceduringmoderatehyperthermiawithorwithoutskintemperaturemanipulation
AT hartleygeoffreyl clampingofendtidalcarbondioxidedoesnotinfluencecognitivefunctionperformanceduringmoderatehyperthermiawithorwithoutskintemperaturemanipulation
AT cheungstephens clampingofendtidalcarbondioxidedoesnotinfluencecognitivefunctionperformanceduringmoderatehyperthermiawithorwithoutskintemperaturemanipulation