Cargando…
The Clamping of End-Tidal Carbon Dioxide Does Not Influence Cognitive Function Performance During Moderate Hyperthermia With or Without Skin Temperature Manipulation
Increases in body temperature from heat stress (i.e., hyperthermia) generally impairs cognitive function across a range of domains and complexities, but the relative contribution from skin versus core temperature changes remains unclear. Hyperthermia also elicits a hyperventilatory response that dec...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8730541/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35002880 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.788027 |
_version_ | 1784627154145771520 |
---|---|
author | Schultz Martins, Ricardo Wallace, Phillip J. Steele, Scott W. Scott, Jake S. Taber, Michael J. Hartley, Geoffrey L. Cheung, Stephen S. |
author_facet | Schultz Martins, Ricardo Wallace, Phillip J. Steele, Scott W. Scott, Jake S. Taber, Michael J. Hartley, Geoffrey L. Cheung, Stephen S. |
author_sort | Schultz Martins, Ricardo |
collection | PubMed |
description | Increases in body temperature from heat stress (i.e., hyperthermia) generally impairs cognitive function across a range of domains and complexities, but the relative contribution from skin versus core temperature changes remains unclear. Hyperthermia also elicits a hyperventilatory response that decreases the partial pressure of end-tidal carbon dioxide (P(et)CO(2)) and subsequently cerebral blood flow that may influence cognitive function. We studied the role of skin and core temperature along with P(et)CO(2) on cognitive function across a range of domains. Eleven males completed a randomized, single-blinded protocol consisting of poikilocapnia (POIKI, no P(et)CO(2) control) or isocapnia (ISO, P(et)CO(2) maintained at baseline levels) during passive heating using a water-perfused suit (water temperature ~ 49°C) while middle cerebral artery velocity (MCA(v)) was measured continuously as an index of cerebral blood flow. Cognitive testing was completed at baseline, neutral core-hot skin (37.0 ± 0.2°C-37.4 ± 0.3°C), hot core-hot skin (38.6 ± 0.3°C-38.7 ± 0.2°C), and hot core-cooled skin (38.5 ± 0.3°C-34.7 ± 0.6°C). The cognitive test battery consisted of a detection task (psychomotor processing), 2-back task (working memory), set-shifting and Groton Maze Learning Task (executive function). At hot core-hot skin, poikilocapnia led to significant (both p < 0.05) decreases in P(et)CO(2) (∆−21%) and MCA(v) (∆−26%) from baseline, while isocapnia clamped P(et)CO(2) (∆ + 4% from baseline) leading to a significantly (p = 0.023) higher MCA(v) (∆−18% from baseline) compared to poikilocapnia. There were no significant differences in errors made on any task (all p > 0.05) irrespective of skin temperature or P(et)CO(2) manipulation. We conclude that neither skin temperature nor P(et)CO(2) maintenance significantly alter cognitive function during passive hyperthermia. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8730541 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87305412022-01-06 The Clamping of End-Tidal Carbon Dioxide Does Not Influence Cognitive Function Performance During Moderate Hyperthermia With or Without Skin Temperature Manipulation Schultz Martins, Ricardo Wallace, Phillip J. Steele, Scott W. Scott, Jake S. Taber, Michael J. Hartley, Geoffrey L. Cheung, Stephen S. Front Psychol Psychology Increases in body temperature from heat stress (i.e., hyperthermia) generally impairs cognitive function across a range of domains and complexities, but the relative contribution from skin versus core temperature changes remains unclear. Hyperthermia also elicits a hyperventilatory response that decreases the partial pressure of end-tidal carbon dioxide (P(et)CO(2)) and subsequently cerebral blood flow that may influence cognitive function. We studied the role of skin and core temperature along with P(et)CO(2) on cognitive function across a range of domains. Eleven males completed a randomized, single-blinded protocol consisting of poikilocapnia (POIKI, no P(et)CO(2) control) or isocapnia (ISO, P(et)CO(2) maintained at baseline levels) during passive heating using a water-perfused suit (water temperature ~ 49°C) while middle cerebral artery velocity (MCA(v)) was measured continuously as an index of cerebral blood flow. Cognitive testing was completed at baseline, neutral core-hot skin (37.0 ± 0.2°C-37.4 ± 0.3°C), hot core-hot skin (38.6 ± 0.3°C-38.7 ± 0.2°C), and hot core-cooled skin (38.5 ± 0.3°C-34.7 ± 0.6°C). The cognitive test battery consisted of a detection task (psychomotor processing), 2-back task (working memory), set-shifting and Groton Maze Learning Task (executive function). At hot core-hot skin, poikilocapnia led to significant (both p < 0.05) decreases in P(et)CO(2) (∆−21%) and MCA(v) (∆−26%) from baseline, while isocapnia clamped P(et)CO(2) (∆ + 4% from baseline) leading to a significantly (p = 0.023) higher MCA(v) (∆−18% from baseline) compared to poikilocapnia. There were no significant differences in errors made on any task (all p > 0.05) irrespective of skin temperature or P(et)CO(2) manipulation. We conclude that neither skin temperature nor P(et)CO(2) maintenance significantly alter cognitive function during passive hyperthermia. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-12-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8730541/ /pubmed/35002880 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.788027 Text en Copyright © 2021 Schultz Martins, Wallace, Steele, Scott, Taber, Hartley and Cheung. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Schultz Martins, Ricardo Wallace, Phillip J. Steele, Scott W. Scott, Jake S. Taber, Michael J. Hartley, Geoffrey L. Cheung, Stephen S. The Clamping of End-Tidal Carbon Dioxide Does Not Influence Cognitive Function Performance During Moderate Hyperthermia With or Without Skin Temperature Manipulation |
title | The Clamping of End-Tidal Carbon Dioxide Does Not Influence Cognitive Function Performance During Moderate Hyperthermia With or Without Skin Temperature Manipulation |
title_full | The Clamping of End-Tidal Carbon Dioxide Does Not Influence Cognitive Function Performance During Moderate Hyperthermia With or Without Skin Temperature Manipulation |
title_fullStr | The Clamping of End-Tidal Carbon Dioxide Does Not Influence Cognitive Function Performance During Moderate Hyperthermia With or Without Skin Temperature Manipulation |
title_full_unstemmed | The Clamping of End-Tidal Carbon Dioxide Does Not Influence Cognitive Function Performance During Moderate Hyperthermia With or Without Skin Temperature Manipulation |
title_short | The Clamping of End-Tidal Carbon Dioxide Does Not Influence Cognitive Function Performance During Moderate Hyperthermia With or Without Skin Temperature Manipulation |
title_sort | clamping of end-tidal carbon dioxide does not influence cognitive function performance during moderate hyperthermia with or without skin temperature manipulation |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8730541/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35002880 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.788027 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schultzmartinsricardo theclampingofendtidalcarbondioxidedoesnotinfluencecognitivefunctionperformanceduringmoderatehyperthermiawithorwithoutskintemperaturemanipulation AT wallacephillipj theclampingofendtidalcarbondioxidedoesnotinfluencecognitivefunctionperformanceduringmoderatehyperthermiawithorwithoutskintemperaturemanipulation AT steelescottw theclampingofendtidalcarbondioxidedoesnotinfluencecognitivefunctionperformanceduringmoderatehyperthermiawithorwithoutskintemperaturemanipulation AT scottjakes theclampingofendtidalcarbondioxidedoesnotinfluencecognitivefunctionperformanceduringmoderatehyperthermiawithorwithoutskintemperaturemanipulation AT tabermichaelj theclampingofendtidalcarbondioxidedoesnotinfluencecognitivefunctionperformanceduringmoderatehyperthermiawithorwithoutskintemperaturemanipulation AT hartleygeoffreyl theclampingofendtidalcarbondioxidedoesnotinfluencecognitivefunctionperformanceduringmoderatehyperthermiawithorwithoutskintemperaturemanipulation AT cheungstephens theclampingofendtidalcarbondioxidedoesnotinfluencecognitivefunctionperformanceduringmoderatehyperthermiawithorwithoutskintemperaturemanipulation AT schultzmartinsricardo clampingofendtidalcarbondioxidedoesnotinfluencecognitivefunctionperformanceduringmoderatehyperthermiawithorwithoutskintemperaturemanipulation AT wallacephillipj clampingofendtidalcarbondioxidedoesnotinfluencecognitivefunctionperformanceduringmoderatehyperthermiawithorwithoutskintemperaturemanipulation AT steelescottw clampingofendtidalcarbondioxidedoesnotinfluencecognitivefunctionperformanceduringmoderatehyperthermiawithorwithoutskintemperaturemanipulation AT scottjakes clampingofendtidalcarbondioxidedoesnotinfluencecognitivefunctionperformanceduringmoderatehyperthermiawithorwithoutskintemperaturemanipulation AT tabermichaelj clampingofendtidalcarbondioxidedoesnotinfluencecognitivefunctionperformanceduringmoderatehyperthermiawithorwithoutskintemperaturemanipulation AT hartleygeoffreyl clampingofendtidalcarbondioxidedoesnotinfluencecognitivefunctionperformanceduringmoderatehyperthermiawithorwithoutskintemperaturemanipulation AT cheungstephens clampingofendtidalcarbondioxidedoesnotinfluencecognitivefunctionperformanceduringmoderatehyperthermiawithorwithoutskintemperaturemanipulation |