Cargando…
Comparison of Vie Scope® and Macintosh laryngoscopes for intubation during resuscitation by paramedics wearing personal protective equipment
BACKGROUND: Endotracheal intubation (ETI) is still the gold standard of airway management, but in cases of sudden cardiac arrest in patients with suspected SARS-CoV-2 infection, ETI is associated with risks for both the patient and the medical personnel. We hypothesized that the Vie Scope® is more u...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8731221/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35016094 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2021.12.069 |
_version_ | 1784627312728211456 |
---|---|
author | Szarpak, Lukasz Peacock, Frank W. Rafique, Zubaid Ladny, Jerzy R. Nadolny, Klaudiusz Malysz, Marek Dabrowski, Marek Chirico, Francesco Smereka, Jacek |
author_facet | Szarpak, Lukasz Peacock, Frank W. Rafique, Zubaid Ladny, Jerzy R. Nadolny, Klaudiusz Malysz, Marek Dabrowski, Marek Chirico, Francesco Smereka, Jacek |
author_sort | Szarpak, Lukasz |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Endotracheal intubation (ETI) is still the gold standard of airway management, but in cases of sudden cardiac arrest in patients with suspected SARS-CoV-2 infection, ETI is associated with risks for both the patient and the medical personnel. We hypothesized that the Vie Scope® is more useful for endotracheal intubation of suspected or confirmed COVID-19 cardiac arrest patients than the conventional laryngoscope with Macintosh blade when operators are wearing personal protective equipment (PPE). METHODS: Study was designed as a prospective, multicenter, randomized clinical trial performed by Emergency Medical Services in Poland. Patients with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 diagnosis who needed cardiopulmonary resuscitation in prehospital setting were included. Patients under 18 years old or with criteria predictive of impossible intubation under direct laryngoscopy, were excluded. Patients were randomly allocated 1:1 to Vie Scope® versus direct laryngoscopy with a Macintosh blade. Study groups were compared on success of intubation attempts, time to intubation, glottis visualization and number of optimization maneuvers. RESULTS: We enrolled 90 out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients, aged 43–92 years. Compared to the VieScope® laryngoscope, use of the Macintosh laryngoscope required longer times for tracheal intubation with an estimated mean difference of −48 s (95%CI confidence interval [CI], −60.23, −35.77; p < 0.001). Moreover VieScope® improved first attempt success rate, 93.3% vs. 51.1% respectively (odds ratio [OR] = 13.39; 95%CI: 3.62, 49.58; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The use of the Vie Scope® laryngoscope in OHCA patients improved the first attempt success rate, and reduced intubation time compared to Macintosh laryngoscope in paramedics wearing PPE for against aerosol generating procedures. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials registration number NCT04365608 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8731221 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87312212022-01-06 Comparison of Vie Scope® and Macintosh laryngoscopes for intubation during resuscitation by paramedics wearing personal protective equipment Szarpak, Lukasz Peacock, Frank W. Rafique, Zubaid Ladny, Jerzy R. Nadolny, Klaudiusz Malysz, Marek Dabrowski, Marek Chirico, Francesco Smereka, Jacek Am J Emerg Med Article BACKGROUND: Endotracheal intubation (ETI) is still the gold standard of airway management, but in cases of sudden cardiac arrest in patients with suspected SARS-CoV-2 infection, ETI is associated with risks for both the patient and the medical personnel. We hypothesized that the Vie Scope® is more useful for endotracheal intubation of suspected or confirmed COVID-19 cardiac arrest patients than the conventional laryngoscope with Macintosh blade when operators are wearing personal protective equipment (PPE). METHODS: Study was designed as a prospective, multicenter, randomized clinical trial performed by Emergency Medical Services in Poland. Patients with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 diagnosis who needed cardiopulmonary resuscitation in prehospital setting were included. Patients under 18 years old or with criteria predictive of impossible intubation under direct laryngoscopy, were excluded. Patients were randomly allocated 1:1 to Vie Scope® versus direct laryngoscopy with a Macintosh blade. Study groups were compared on success of intubation attempts, time to intubation, glottis visualization and number of optimization maneuvers. RESULTS: We enrolled 90 out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients, aged 43–92 years. Compared to the VieScope® laryngoscope, use of the Macintosh laryngoscope required longer times for tracheal intubation with an estimated mean difference of −48 s (95%CI confidence interval [CI], −60.23, −35.77; p < 0.001). Moreover VieScope® improved first attempt success rate, 93.3% vs. 51.1% respectively (odds ratio [OR] = 13.39; 95%CI: 3.62, 49.58; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The use of the Vie Scope® laryngoscope in OHCA patients improved the first attempt success rate, and reduced intubation time compared to Macintosh laryngoscope in paramedics wearing PPE for against aerosol generating procedures. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials registration number NCT04365608 Elsevier Inc. 2022-03 2022-01-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8731221/ /pubmed/35016094 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2021.12.069 Text en © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Article Szarpak, Lukasz Peacock, Frank W. Rafique, Zubaid Ladny, Jerzy R. Nadolny, Klaudiusz Malysz, Marek Dabrowski, Marek Chirico, Francesco Smereka, Jacek Comparison of Vie Scope® and Macintosh laryngoscopes for intubation during resuscitation by paramedics wearing personal protective equipment |
title | Comparison of Vie Scope® and Macintosh laryngoscopes for intubation during resuscitation by paramedics wearing personal protective equipment |
title_full | Comparison of Vie Scope® and Macintosh laryngoscopes for intubation during resuscitation by paramedics wearing personal protective equipment |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Vie Scope® and Macintosh laryngoscopes for intubation during resuscitation by paramedics wearing personal protective equipment |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Vie Scope® and Macintosh laryngoscopes for intubation during resuscitation by paramedics wearing personal protective equipment |
title_short | Comparison of Vie Scope® and Macintosh laryngoscopes for intubation during resuscitation by paramedics wearing personal protective equipment |
title_sort | comparison of vie scope® and macintosh laryngoscopes for intubation during resuscitation by paramedics wearing personal protective equipment |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8731221/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35016094 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2021.12.069 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT szarpaklukasz comparisonofviescopeandmacintoshlaryngoscopesforintubationduringresuscitationbyparamedicswearingpersonalprotectiveequipment AT peacockfrankw comparisonofviescopeandmacintoshlaryngoscopesforintubationduringresuscitationbyparamedicswearingpersonalprotectiveequipment AT rafiquezubaid comparisonofviescopeandmacintoshlaryngoscopesforintubationduringresuscitationbyparamedicswearingpersonalprotectiveequipment AT ladnyjerzyr comparisonofviescopeandmacintoshlaryngoscopesforintubationduringresuscitationbyparamedicswearingpersonalprotectiveequipment AT nadolnyklaudiusz comparisonofviescopeandmacintoshlaryngoscopesforintubationduringresuscitationbyparamedicswearingpersonalprotectiveequipment AT malyszmarek comparisonofviescopeandmacintoshlaryngoscopesforintubationduringresuscitationbyparamedicswearingpersonalprotectiveequipment AT dabrowskimarek comparisonofviescopeandmacintoshlaryngoscopesforintubationduringresuscitationbyparamedicswearingpersonalprotectiveequipment AT chiricofrancesco comparisonofviescopeandmacintoshlaryngoscopesforintubationduringresuscitationbyparamedicswearingpersonalprotectiveequipment AT smerekajacek comparisonofviescopeandmacintoshlaryngoscopesforintubationduringresuscitationbyparamedicswearingpersonalprotectiveequipment |