Cargando…

The importance of blood pressure thresholds versus predicted cardiovascular risk on subsequent rates of cardiovascular disease: a cohort study in English primary care

BACKGROUND: For five decades, blood pressure lowering treatment has been recommended for patients with hypertension (currently defined as blood pressure of ≥140/90 mm Hg). In the past 20 years, guidelines for treatment began incorporating predicted absolute cardiovascular disease risk (predicted ris...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Herrett, Emily, Strongman, Helen, Gadd, Sarah, Tomlinson, Laurie, Nitsch, Dorothea, Bhaskaran, Krishnan, Williamson, Elizabeth, van Staa, Tjeerd, Sofat, Reecha, Timmis, Adam, Wells, Susan, Smeeth, Liam, Jackson, Rod
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Ltd 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8732286/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35028631
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2666-7568(21)00281-6
_version_ 1784627560328462336
author Herrett, Emily
Strongman, Helen
Gadd, Sarah
Tomlinson, Laurie
Nitsch, Dorothea
Bhaskaran, Krishnan
Williamson, Elizabeth
van Staa, Tjeerd
Sofat, Reecha
Timmis, Adam
Wells, Susan
Smeeth, Liam
Jackson, Rod
author_facet Herrett, Emily
Strongman, Helen
Gadd, Sarah
Tomlinson, Laurie
Nitsch, Dorothea
Bhaskaran, Krishnan
Williamson, Elizabeth
van Staa, Tjeerd
Sofat, Reecha
Timmis, Adam
Wells, Susan
Smeeth, Liam
Jackson, Rod
author_sort Herrett, Emily
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: For five decades, blood pressure lowering treatment has been recommended for patients with hypertension (currently defined as blood pressure of ≥140/90 mm Hg). In the past 20 years, guidelines for treatment began incorporating predicted absolute cardiovascular disease risk (predicted risk) and reducing blood pressure thresholds. The blood pressure threshold at which to start treatment has become a secondary consideration in some countries. We aimed to provide descriptive data to assess the relative importance of blood pressure thresholds versus predicted risk on the subsequent rate of cardiovascular disease to inform treatment decisions. METHODS: In this English population-based cohort study, we used linked data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) GOLD, Hospital Episode Statistics Admitted Patient Care, and the Office for National Statistics mortality data, and area-based deprivation indices (Townsend scores). Eligible patients were aged 30–79 years on Jan 1, 2011 (cohort entry date) and could be linked to hospital, mortality, and deprivation data. Patients were followed up until death, end of CPRD follow-up, or Nov 31, 2018. We examined three outcomes: cardiovascular disease, markers of potential target organ damage, and incident dementia without a known cause. The rate of each outcome was estimated and stratified by systolic blood pressure and predicted 10-year risk of cardiovascular disease (QRISK2 algorithm). FINDINGS: Between Jan 1, 2011, and Nov 31, 2018, 1 098 991 patients were included in the cohort and followed up for a median of 4·3 years (IQR 2·6–6·0; total follow-up of 4·6 million person-years). Median age at entry was 52 years (IQR 42–62) and 629 711 (57·3%) patients were female. There were 51 996 cardiovascular disease events and the overall rate of cardiovascular disease was 11·2 per 1000 person-years (95% CI 11·1–11·3). Median QRISK2 10-year predicted risk was 4·6% (IQR 1·4–12·0) and mean systolic blood pressure before cohort entry was 129·1 mm Hg (SD 15·7). Within strata of predicted risk, the effect of increasing systolic blood pressure on outcomes was small. For example, in the group with 10·0–19·9% predicted risk, rates of all cardiovascular disease rose from 20·1 to 23·6 per 1000 person-years between systolic blood pressures less than 110 mm Hg and 180 and higher mm Hg. But among patients with systolic blood pressure 140·0–149·9 mm Hg, rates rose from 6·9 to 52·3 per 1000 person-years between those with less than 10·0% risk and those with 30·0% or higher predicted risk. INTERPRETATION: For a wide range of blood pressures, the rate of cardiovascular disease and effectiveness of blood pressure drug treatment was mainly determined by predicted risk, with blood pressure thresholds 140/90 mm Hg or 160/100 mm Hg—ubiquitous in most countries—adding little useful information. When medium-term predicted risk is low, there is no urgency to initiate drug treatment, allowing time to attempt non-pharmacological blood pressure reduction. FUNDING: National Institute for Health Research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8732286
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87322862022-01-11 The importance of blood pressure thresholds versus predicted cardiovascular risk on subsequent rates of cardiovascular disease: a cohort study in English primary care Herrett, Emily Strongman, Helen Gadd, Sarah Tomlinson, Laurie Nitsch, Dorothea Bhaskaran, Krishnan Williamson, Elizabeth van Staa, Tjeerd Sofat, Reecha Timmis, Adam Wells, Susan Smeeth, Liam Jackson, Rod Lancet Healthy Longev Articles BACKGROUND: For five decades, blood pressure lowering treatment has been recommended for patients with hypertension (currently defined as blood pressure of ≥140/90 mm Hg). In the past 20 years, guidelines for treatment began incorporating predicted absolute cardiovascular disease risk (predicted risk) and reducing blood pressure thresholds. The blood pressure threshold at which to start treatment has become a secondary consideration in some countries. We aimed to provide descriptive data to assess the relative importance of blood pressure thresholds versus predicted risk on the subsequent rate of cardiovascular disease to inform treatment decisions. METHODS: In this English population-based cohort study, we used linked data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) GOLD, Hospital Episode Statistics Admitted Patient Care, and the Office for National Statistics mortality data, and area-based deprivation indices (Townsend scores). Eligible patients were aged 30–79 years on Jan 1, 2011 (cohort entry date) and could be linked to hospital, mortality, and deprivation data. Patients were followed up until death, end of CPRD follow-up, or Nov 31, 2018. We examined three outcomes: cardiovascular disease, markers of potential target organ damage, and incident dementia without a known cause. The rate of each outcome was estimated and stratified by systolic blood pressure and predicted 10-year risk of cardiovascular disease (QRISK2 algorithm). FINDINGS: Between Jan 1, 2011, and Nov 31, 2018, 1 098 991 patients were included in the cohort and followed up for a median of 4·3 years (IQR 2·6–6·0; total follow-up of 4·6 million person-years). Median age at entry was 52 years (IQR 42–62) and 629 711 (57·3%) patients were female. There were 51 996 cardiovascular disease events and the overall rate of cardiovascular disease was 11·2 per 1000 person-years (95% CI 11·1–11·3). Median QRISK2 10-year predicted risk was 4·6% (IQR 1·4–12·0) and mean systolic blood pressure before cohort entry was 129·1 mm Hg (SD 15·7). Within strata of predicted risk, the effect of increasing systolic blood pressure on outcomes was small. For example, in the group with 10·0–19·9% predicted risk, rates of all cardiovascular disease rose from 20·1 to 23·6 per 1000 person-years between systolic blood pressures less than 110 mm Hg and 180 and higher mm Hg. But among patients with systolic blood pressure 140·0–149·9 mm Hg, rates rose from 6·9 to 52·3 per 1000 person-years between those with less than 10·0% risk and those with 30·0% or higher predicted risk. INTERPRETATION: For a wide range of blood pressures, the rate of cardiovascular disease and effectiveness of blood pressure drug treatment was mainly determined by predicted risk, with blood pressure thresholds 140/90 mm Hg or 160/100 mm Hg—ubiquitous in most countries—adding little useful information. When medium-term predicted risk is low, there is no urgency to initiate drug treatment, allowing time to attempt non-pharmacological blood pressure reduction. FUNDING: National Institute for Health Research. Elsevier Ltd 2022-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8732286/ /pubmed/35028631 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2666-7568(21)00281-6 Text en © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Articles
Herrett, Emily
Strongman, Helen
Gadd, Sarah
Tomlinson, Laurie
Nitsch, Dorothea
Bhaskaran, Krishnan
Williamson, Elizabeth
van Staa, Tjeerd
Sofat, Reecha
Timmis, Adam
Wells, Susan
Smeeth, Liam
Jackson, Rod
The importance of blood pressure thresholds versus predicted cardiovascular risk on subsequent rates of cardiovascular disease: a cohort study in English primary care
title The importance of blood pressure thresholds versus predicted cardiovascular risk on subsequent rates of cardiovascular disease: a cohort study in English primary care
title_full The importance of blood pressure thresholds versus predicted cardiovascular risk on subsequent rates of cardiovascular disease: a cohort study in English primary care
title_fullStr The importance of blood pressure thresholds versus predicted cardiovascular risk on subsequent rates of cardiovascular disease: a cohort study in English primary care
title_full_unstemmed The importance of blood pressure thresholds versus predicted cardiovascular risk on subsequent rates of cardiovascular disease: a cohort study in English primary care
title_short The importance of blood pressure thresholds versus predicted cardiovascular risk on subsequent rates of cardiovascular disease: a cohort study in English primary care
title_sort importance of blood pressure thresholds versus predicted cardiovascular risk on subsequent rates of cardiovascular disease: a cohort study in english primary care
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8732286/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35028631
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2666-7568(21)00281-6
work_keys_str_mv AT herrettemily theimportanceofbloodpressurethresholdsversuspredictedcardiovascularriskonsubsequentratesofcardiovasculardiseaseacohortstudyinenglishprimarycare
AT strongmanhelen theimportanceofbloodpressurethresholdsversuspredictedcardiovascularriskonsubsequentratesofcardiovasculardiseaseacohortstudyinenglishprimarycare
AT gaddsarah theimportanceofbloodpressurethresholdsversuspredictedcardiovascularriskonsubsequentratesofcardiovasculardiseaseacohortstudyinenglishprimarycare
AT tomlinsonlaurie theimportanceofbloodpressurethresholdsversuspredictedcardiovascularriskonsubsequentratesofcardiovasculardiseaseacohortstudyinenglishprimarycare
AT nitschdorothea theimportanceofbloodpressurethresholdsversuspredictedcardiovascularriskonsubsequentratesofcardiovasculardiseaseacohortstudyinenglishprimarycare
AT bhaskarankrishnan theimportanceofbloodpressurethresholdsversuspredictedcardiovascularriskonsubsequentratesofcardiovasculardiseaseacohortstudyinenglishprimarycare
AT williamsonelizabeth theimportanceofbloodpressurethresholdsversuspredictedcardiovascularriskonsubsequentratesofcardiovasculardiseaseacohortstudyinenglishprimarycare
AT vanstaatjeerd theimportanceofbloodpressurethresholdsversuspredictedcardiovascularriskonsubsequentratesofcardiovasculardiseaseacohortstudyinenglishprimarycare
AT sofatreecha theimportanceofbloodpressurethresholdsversuspredictedcardiovascularriskonsubsequentratesofcardiovasculardiseaseacohortstudyinenglishprimarycare
AT timmisadam theimportanceofbloodpressurethresholdsversuspredictedcardiovascularriskonsubsequentratesofcardiovasculardiseaseacohortstudyinenglishprimarycare
AT wellssusan theimportanceofbloodpressurethresholdsversuspredictedcardiovascularriskonsubsequentratesofcardiovasculardiseaseacohortstudyinenglishprimarycare
AT smeethliam theimportanceofbloodpressurethresholdsversuspredictedcardiovascularriskonsubsequentratesofcardiovasculardiseaseacohortstudyinenglishprimarycare
AT jacksonrod theimportanceofbloodpressurethresholdsversuspredictedcardiovascularriskonsubsequentratesofcardiovasculardiseaseacohortstudyinenglishprimarycare
AT herrettemily importanceofbloodpressurethresholdsversuspredictedcardiovascularriskonsubsequentratesofcardiovasculardiseaseacohortstudyinenglishprimarycare
AT strongmanhelen importanceofbloodpressurethresholdsversuspredictedcardiovascularriskonsubsequentratesofcardiovasculardiseaseacohortstudyinenglishprimarycare
AT gaddsarah importanceofbloodpressurethresholdsversuspredictedcardiovascularriskonsubsequentratesofcardiovasculardiseaseacohortstudyinenglishprimarycare
AT tomlinsonlaurie importanceofbloodpressurethresholdsversuspredictedcardiovascularriskonsubsequentratesofcardiovasculardiseaseacohortstudyinenglishprimarycare
AT nitschdorothea importanceofbloodpressurethresholdsversuspredictedcardiovascularriskonsubsequentratesofcardiovasculardiseaseacohortstudyinenglishprimarycare
AT bhaskarankrishnan importanceofbloodpressurethresholdsversuspredictedcardiovascularriskonsubsequentratesofcardiovasculardiseaseacohortstudyinenglishprimarycare
AT williamsonelizabeth importanceofbloodpressurethresholdsversuspredictedcardiovascularriskonsubsequentratesofcardiovasculardiseaseacohortstudyinenglishprimarycare
AT vanstaatjeerd importanceofbloodpressurethresholdsversuspredictedcardiovascularriskonsubsequentratesofcardiovasculardiseaseacohortstudyinenglishprimarycare
AT sofatreecha importanceofbloodpressurethresholdsversuspredictedcardiovascularriskonsubsequentratesofcardiovasculardiseaseacohortstudyinenglishprimarycare
AT timmisadam importanceofbloodpressurethresholdsversuspredictedcardiovascularriskonsubsequentratesofcardiovasculardiseaseacohortstudyinenglishprimarycare
AT wellssusan importanceofbloodpressurethresholdsversuspredictedcardiovascularriskonsubsequentratesofcardiovasculardiseaseacohortstudyinenglishprimarycare
AT smeethliam importanceofbloodpressurethresholdsversuspredictedcardiovascularriskonsubsequentratesofcardiovasculardiseaseacohortstudyinenglishprimarycare
AT jacksonrod importanceofbloodpressurethresholdsversuspredictedcardiovascularriskonsubsequentratesofcardiovasculardiseaseacohortstudyinenglishprimarycare