Cargando…
Multi‐omic molecular profiling guide’s efficacious treatment selection in refractory metastatic breast cancer: a prospective phase II clinical trial
This prospective phase II clinical trial (Side Out 2) explored the clinical benefits of treatment selection informed by multi‐omic molecular profiling (MoMP) in refractory metastatic breast cancers (MBCs). Core needle biopsies were collected from 32 patients with MBC at trial enrollment. Patients ha...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8732340/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34437759 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1878-0261.13091 |
_version_ | 1784627565459144704 |
---|---|
author | Pierobon, Mariaelena Robert, Nicholas J. Northfelt, Donald W. Jahanzeb, Mohammad Wong, Shukmei Hodge, Kimberly A. Baldelli, Elisa Aldrich, Jessica Craig, David W. Liotta, Lance A. Avramovic, Sanja Wojtusiak, Janusz Alemi, Farrokh Wulfkuhle, Julia D. Bellos, Angela Gallagher, Rosa I. Arguello, David Conrad, Amber Kemkes, Ariane Loesch, David M. Vocila, Linda Dunetz, Bryant Carpten, John D. Petricoin, Emanuel F. Anthony, Stephen P. |
author_facet | Pierobon, Mariaelena Robert, Nicholas J. Northfelt, Donald W. Jahanzeb, Mohammad Wong, Shukmei Hodge, Kimberly A. Baldelli, Elisa Aldrich, Jessica Craig, David W. Liotta, Lance A. Avramovic, Sanja Wojtusiak, Janusz Alemi, Farrokh Wulfkuhle, Julia D. Bellos, Angela Gallagher, Rosa I. Arguello, David Conrad, Amber Kemkes, Ariane Loesch, David M. Vocila, Linda Dunetz, Bryant Carpten, John D. Petricoin, Emanuel F. Anthony, Stephen P. |
author_sort | Pierobon, Mariaelena |
collection | PubMed |
description | This prospective phase II clinical trial (Side Out 2) explored the clinical benefits of treatment selection informed by multi‐omic molecular profiling (MoMP) in refractory metastatic breast cancers (MBCs). Core needle biopsies were collected from 32 patients with MBC at trial enrollment. Patients had received an average of 3.94 previous lines of treatment in the metastatic setting before enrollment in this study. Samples underwent MoMP, including exome sequencing, RNA sequencing (RNA‐Seq), immunohistochemistry, and quantitative protein pathway activation mapping by Reverse Phase Protein Microarray (RPPA). Clinical benefit was assessed using the previously published growth modulation index (GMI) under the hypothesis that MoMP‐selected therapy would warrant further investigation for GMI ≥ 1.3 in ≥ 35% of the patients. Of the 32 patients enrolled, 29 received treatment based on their MoMP and 25 met the follow‐up criteria established by the trial protocol. Molecular information was delivered to the tumor board in a median time frame of 14 days (11–22 days), and targetable alterations for commercially available agents were found in 23/25 patients (92%). Of the 25 patients, 14 (56%) reached GMI ≥ 1.3. A high level of DNA topoisomerase I (TOPO1) led to the selection of irinotecan‐based treatments in 48% (12/25) of the patients. A pooled analysis suggested clinical benefit in patients with high TOPO1 expression receiving irinotecan‐based regimens (GMI ≥ 1.3 in 66.7% of cases). These results confirmed previous observations that MoMP increases the frequency of identifiable actionable alterations (92% of patients). The MoMP proposed allows the identification of biomarkers that are frequently expressed in MBCs and the evaluation of their role as predictors of response to commercially available agents. Lastly, this study confirmed the role of MoMP for informing treatment selection in refractory MBC patients: more than half of the enrolled patients reached a GMI ≥ 1.3 even after multiple lines of previous therapies for metastatic disease. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8732340 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87323402022-01-11 Multi‐omic molecular profiling guide’s efficacious treatment selection in refractory metastatic breast cancer: a prospective phase II clinical trial Pierobon, Mariaelena Robert, Nicholas J. Northfelt, Donald W. Jahanzeb, Mohammad Wong, Shukmei Hodge, Kimberly A. Baldelli, Elisa Aldrich, Jessica Craig, David W. Liotta, Lance A. Avramovic, Sanja Wojtusiak, Janusz Alemi, Farrokh Wulfkuhle, Julia D. Bellos, Angela Gallagher, Rosa I. Arguello, David Conrad, Amber Kemkes, Ariane Loesch, David M. Vocila, Linda Dunetz, Bryant Carpten, John D. Petricoin, Emanuel F. Anthony, Stephen P. Mol Oncol Research Articles This prospective phase II clinical trial (Side Out 2) explored the clinical benefits of treatment selection informed by multi‐omic molecular profiling (MoMP) in refractory metastatic breast cancers (MBCs). Core needle biopsies were collected from 32 patients with MBC at trial enrollment. Patients had received an average of 3.94 previous lines of treatment in the metastatic setting before enrollment in this study. Samples underwent MoMP, including exome sequencing, RNA sequencing (RNA‐Seq), immunohistochemistry, and quantitative protein pathway activation mapping by Reverse Phase Protein Microarray (RPPA). Clinical benefit was assessed using the previously published growth modulation index (GMI) under the hypothesis that MoMP‐selected therapy would warrant further investigation for GMI ≥ 1.3 in ≥ 35% of the patients. Of the 32 patients enrolled, 29 received treatment based on their MoMP and 25 met the follow‐up criteria established by the trial protocol. Molecular information was delivered to the tumor board in a median time frame of 14 days (11–22 days), and targetable alterations for commercially available agents were found in 23/25 patients (92%). Of the 25 patients, 14 (56%) reached GMI ≥ 1.3. A high level of DNA topoisomerase I (TOPO1) led to the selection of irinotecan‐based treatments in 48% (12/25) of the patients. A pooled analysis suggested clinical benefit in patients with high TOPO1 expression receiving irinotecan‐based regimens (GMI ≥ 1.3 in 66.7% of cases). These results confirmed previous observations that MoMP increases the frequency of identifiable actionable alterations (92% of patients). The MoMP proposed allows the identification of biomarkers that are frequently expressed in MBCs and the evaluation of their role as predictors of response to commercially available agents. Lastly, this study confirmed the role of MoMP for informing treatment selection in refractory MBC patients: more than half of the enrolled patients reached a GMI ≥ 1.3 even after multiple lines of previous therapies for metastatic disease. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-09-12 2022-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8732340/ /pubmed/34437759 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1878-0261.13091 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Molecular Oncology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Federation of European Biochemical Societies https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Pierobon, Mariaelena Robert, Nicholas J. Northfelt, Donald W. Jahanzeb, Mohammad Wong, Shukmei Hodge, Kimberly A. Baldelli, Elisa Aldrich, Jessica Craig, David W. Liotta, Lance A. Avramovic, Sanja Wojtusiak, Janusz Alemi, Farrokh Wulfkuhle, Julia D. Bellos, Angela Gallagher, Rosa I. Arguello, David Conrad, Amber Kemkes, Ariane Loesch, David M. Vocila, Linda Dunetz, Bryant Carpten, John D. Petricoin, Emanuel F. Anthony, Stephen P. Multi‐omic molecular profiling guide’s efficacious treatment selection in refractory metastatic breast cancer: a prospective phase II clinical trial |
title | Multi‐omic molecular profiling guide’s efficacious treatment selection in refractory metastatic breast cancer: a prospective phase II clinical trial |
title_full | Multi‐omic molecular profiling guide’s efficacious treatment selection in refractory metastatic breast cancer: a prospective phase II clinical trial |
title_fullStr | Multi‐omic molecular profiling guide’s efficacious treatment selection in refractory metastatic breast cancer: a prospective phase II clinical trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Multi‐omic molecular profiling guide’s efficacious treatment selection in refractory metastatic breast cancer: a prospective phase II clinical trial |
title_short | Multi‐omic molecular profiling guide’s efficacious treatment selection in refractory metastatic breast cancer: a prospective phase II clinical trial |
title_sort | multi‐omic molecular profiling guide’s efficacious treatment selection in refractory metastatic breast cancer: a prospective phase ii clinical trial |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8732340/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34437759 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1878-0261.13091 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pierobonmariaelena multiomicmolecularprofilingguidesefficacioustreatmentselectioninrefractorymetastaticbreastcanceraprospectivephaseiiclinicaltrial AT robertnicholasj multiomicmolecularprofilingguidesefficacioustreatmentselectioninrefractorymetastaticbreastcanceraprospectivephaseiiclinicaltrial AT northfeltdonaldw multiomicmolecularprofilingguidesefficacioustreatmentselectioninrefractorymetastaticbreastcanceraprospectivephaseiiclinicaltrial AT jahanzebmohammad multiomicmolecularprofilingguidesefficacioustreatmentselectioninrefractorymetastaticbreastcanceraprospectivephaseiiclinicaltrial AT wongshukmei multiomicmolecularprofilingguidesefficacioustreatmentselectioninrefractorymetastaticbreastcanceraprospectivephaseiiclinicaltrial AT hodgekimberlya multiomicmolecularprofilingguidesefficacioustreatmentselectioninrefractorymetastaticbreastcanceraprospectivephaseiiclinicaltrial AT baldellielisa multiomicmolecularprofilingguidesefficacioustreatmentselectioninrefractorymetastaticbreastcanceraprospectivephaseiiclinicaltrial AT aldrichjessica multiomicmolecularprofilingguidesefficacioustreatmentselectioninrefractorymetastaticbreastcanceraprospectivephaseiiclinicaltrial AT craigdavidw multiomicmolecularprofilingguidesefficacioustreatmentselectioninrefractorymetastaticbreastcanceraprospectivephaseiiclinicaltrial AT liottalancea multiomicmolecularprofilingguidesefficacioustreatmentselectioninrefractorymetastaticbreastcanceraprospectivephaseiiclinicaltrial AT avramovicsanja multiomicmolecularprofilingguidesefficacioustreatmentselectioninrefractorymetastaticbreastcanceraprospectivephaseiiclinicaltrial AT wojtusiakjanusz multiomicmolecularprofilingguidesefficacioustreatmentselectioninrefractorymetastaticbreastcanceraprospectivephaseiiclinicaltrial AT alemifarrokh multiomicmolecularprofilingguidesefficacioustreatmentselectioninrefractorymetastaticbreastcanceraprospectivephaseiiclinicaltrial AT wulfkuhlejuliad multiomicmolecularprofilingguidesefficacioustreatmentselectioninrefractorymetastaticbreastcanceraprospectivephaseiiclinicaltrial AT bellosangela multiomicmolecularprofilingguidesefficacioustreatmentselectioninrefractorymetastaticbreastcanceraprospectivephaseiiclinicaltrial AT gallagherrosai multiomicmolecularprofilingguidesefficacioustreatmentselectioninrefractorymetastaticbreastcanceraprospectivephaseiiclinicaltrial AT arguellodavid multiomicmolecularprofilingguidesefficacioustreatmentselectioninrefractorymetastaticbreastcanceraprospectivephaseiiclinicaltrial AT conradamber multiomicmolecularprofilingguidesefficacioustreatmentselectioninrefractorymetastaticbreastcanceraprospectivephaseiiclinicaltrial AT kemkesariane multiomicmolecularprofilingguidesefficacioustreatmentselectioninrefractorymetastaticbreastcanceraprospectivephaseiiclinicaltrial AT loeschdavidm multiomicmolecularprofilingguidesefficacioustreatmentselectioninrefractorymetastaticbreastcanceraprospectivephaseiiclinicaltrial AT vocilalinda multiomicmolecularprofilingguidesefficacioustreatmentselectioninrefractorymetastaticbreastcanceraprospectivephaseiiclinicaltrial AT dunetzbryant multiomicmolecularprofilingguidesefficacioustreatmentselectioninrefractorymetastaticbreastcanceraprospectivephaseiiclinicaltrial AT carptenjohnd multiomicmolecularprofilingguidesefficacioustreatmentselectioninrefractorymetastaticbreastcanceraprospectivephaseiiclinicaltrial AT petricoinemanuelf multiomicmolecularprofilingguidesefficacioustreatmentselectioninrefractorymetastaticbreastcanceraprospectivephaseiiclinicaltrial AT anthonystephenp multiomicmolecularprofilingguidesefficacioustreatmentselectioninrefractorymetastaticbreastcanceraprospectivephaseiiclinicaltrial |