Cargando…

Multi‐omic molecular profiling guide’s efficacious treatment selection in refractory metastatic breast cancer: a prospective phase II clinical trial

This prospective phase II clinical trial (Side Out 2) explored the clinical benefits of treatment selection informed by multi‐omic molecular profiling (MoMP) in refractory metastatic breast cancers (MBCs). Core needle biopsies were collected from 32 patients with MBC at trial enrollment. Patients ha...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pierobon, Mariaelena, Robert, Nicholas J., Northfelt, Donald W., Jahanzeb, Mohammad, Wong, Shukmei, Hodge, Kimberly A., Baldelli, Elisa, Aldrich, Jessica, Craig, David W., Liotta, Lance A., Avramovic, Sanja, Wojtusiak, Janusz, Alemi, Farrokh, Wulfkuhle, Julia D., Bellos, Angela, Gallagher, Rosa I., Arguello, David, Conrad, Amber, Kemkes, Ariane, Loesch, David M., Vocila, Linda, Dunetz, Bryant, Carpten, John D., Petricoin, Emanuel F., Anthony, Stephen P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8732340/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34437759
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1878-0261.13091
_version_ 1784627565459144704
author Pierobon, Mariaelena
Robert, Nicholas J.
Northfelt, Donald W.
Jahanzeb, Mohammad
Wong, Shukmei
Hodge, Kimberly A.
Baldelli, Elisa
Aldrich, Jessica
Craig, David W.
Liotta, Lance A.
Avramovic, Sanja
Wojtusiak, Janusz
Alemi, Farrokh
Wulfkuhle, Julia D.
Bellos, Angela
Gallagher, Rosa I.
Arguello, David
Conrad, Amber
Kemkes, Ariane
Loesch, David M.
Vocila, Linda
Dunetz, Bryant
Carpten, John D.
Petricoin, Emanuel F.
Anthony, Stephen P.
author_facet Pierobon, Mariaelena
Robert, Nicholas J.
Northfelt, Donald W.
Jahanzeb, Mohammad
Wong, Shukmei
Hodge, Kimberly A.
Baldelli, Elisa
Aldrich, Jessica
Craig, David W.
Liotta, Lance A.
Avramovic, Sanja
Wojtusiak, Janusz
Alemi, Farrokh
Wulfkuhle, Julia D.
Bellos, Angela
Gallagher, Rosa I.
Arguello, David
Conrad, Amber
Kemkes, Ariane
Loesch, David M.
Vocila, Linda
Dunetz, Bryant
Carpten, John D.
Petricoin, Emanuel F.
Anthony, Stephen P.
author_sort Pierobon, Mariaelena
collection PubMed
description This prospective phase II clinical trial (Side Out 2) explored the clinical benefits of treatment selection informed by multi‐omic molecular profiling (MoMP) in refractory metastatic breast cancers (MBCs). Core needle biopsies were collected from 32 patients with MBC at trial enrollment. Patients had received an average of 3.94 previous lines of treatment in the metastatic setting before enrollment in this study. Samples underwent MoMP, including exome sequencing, RNA sequencing (RNA‐Seq), immunohistochemistry, and quantitative protein pathway activation mapping by Reverse Phase Protein Microarray (RPPA). Clinical benefit was assessed using the previously published growth modulation index (GMI) under the hypothesis that MoMP‐selected therapy would warrant further investigation for GMI ≥ 1.3 in ≥ 35% of the patients. Of the 32 patients enrolled, 29 received treatment based on their MoMP and 25 met the follow‐up criteria established by the trial protocol. Molecular information was delivered to the tumor board in a median time frame of 14 days (11–22 days), and targetable alterations for commercially available agents were found in 23/25 patients (92%). Of the 25 patients, 14 (56%) reached GMI ≥ 1.3. A high level of DNA topoisomerase I (TOPO1) led to the selection of irinotecan‐based treatments in 48% (12/25) of the patients. A pooled analysis suggested clinical benefit in patients with high TOPO1 expression receiving irinotecan‐based regimens (GMI ≥ 1.3 in 66.7% of cases). These results confirmed previous observations that MoMP increases the frequency of identifiable actionable alterations (92% of patients). The MoMP proposed allows the identification of biomarkers that are frequently expressed in MBCs and the evaluation of their role as predictors of response to commercially available agents. Lastly, this study confirmed the role of MoMP for informing treatment selection in refractory MBC patients: more than half of the enrolled patients reached a GMI ≥ 1.3 even after multiple lines of previous therapies for metastatic disease.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8732340
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87323402022-01-11 Multi‐omic molecular profiling guide’s efficacious treatment selection in refractory metastatic breast cancer: a prospective phase II clinical trial Pierobon, Mariaelena Robert, Nicholas J. Northfelt, Donald W. Jahanzeb, Mohammad Wong, Shukmei Hodge, Kimberly A. Baldelli, Elisa Aldrich, Jessica Craig, David W. Liotta, Lance A. Avramovic, Sanja Wojtusiak, Janusz Alemi, Farrokh Wulfkuhle, Julia D. Bellos, Angela Gallagher, Rosa I. Arguello, David Conrad, Amber Kemkes, Ariane Loesch, David M. Vocila, Linda Dunetz, Bryant Carpten, John D. Petricoin, Emanuel F. Anthony, Stephen P. Mol Oncol Research Articles This prospective phase II clinical trial (Side Out 2) explored the clinical benefits of treatment selection informed by multi‐omic molecular profiling (MoMP) in refractory metastatic breast cancers (MBCs). Core needle biopsies were collected from 32 patients with MBC at trial enrollment. Patients had received an average of 3.94 previous lines of treatment in the metastatic setting before enrollment in this study. Samples underwent MoMP, including exome sequencing, RNA sequencing (RNA‐Seq), immunohistochemistry, and quantitative protein pathway activation mapping by Reverse Phase Protein Microarray (RPPA). Clinical benefit was assessed using the previously published growth modulation index (GMI) under the hypothesis that MoMP‐selected therapy would warrant further investigation for GMI ≥ 1.3 in ≥ 35% of the patients. Of the 32 patients enrolled, 29 received treatment based on their MoMP and 25 met the follow‐up criteria established by the trial protocol. Molecular information was delivered to the tumor board in a median time frame of 14 days (11–22 days), and targetable alterations for commercially available agents were found in 23/25 patients (92%). Of the 25 patients, 14 (56%) reached GMI ≥ 1.3. A high level of DNA topoisomerase I (TOPO1) led to the selection of irinotecan‐based treatments in 48% (12/25) of the patients. A pooled analysis suggested clinical benefit in patients with high TOPO1 expression receiving irinotecan‐based regimens (GMI ≥ 1.3 in 66.7% of cases). These results confirmed previous observations that MoMP increases the frequency of identifiable actionable alterations (92% of patients). The MoMP proposed allows the identification of biomarkers that are frequently expressed in MBCs and the evaluation of their role as predictors of response to commercially available agents. Lastly, this study confirmed the role of MoMP for informing treatment selection in refractory MBC patients: more than half of the enrolled patients reached a GMI ≥ 1.3 even after multiple lines of previous therapies for metastatic disease. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-09-12 2022-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8732340/ /pubmed/34437759 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1878-0261.13091 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Molecular Oncology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Federation of European Biochemical Societies https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Pierobon, Mariaelena
Robert, Nicholas J.
Northfelt, Donald W.
Jahanzeb, Mohammad
Wong, Shukmei
Hodge, Kimberly A.
Baldelli, Elisa
Aldrich, Jessica
Craig, David W.
Liotta, Lance A.
Avramovic, Sanja
Wojtusiak, Janusz
Alemi, Farrokh
Wulfkuhle, Julia D.
Bellos, Angela
Gallagher, Rosa I.
Arguello, David
Conrad, Amber
Kemkes, Ariane
Loesch, David M.
Vocila, Linda
Dunetz, Bryant
Carpten, John D.
Petricoin, Emanuel F.
Anthony, Stephen P.
Multi‐omic molecular profiling guide’s efficacious treatment selection in refractory metastatic breast cancer: a prospective phase II clinical trial
title Multi‐omic molecular profiling guide’s efficacious treatment selection in refractory metastatic breast cancer: a prospective phase II clinical trial
title_full Multi‐omic molecular profiling guide’s efficacious treatment selection in refractory metastatic breast cancer: a prospective phase II clinical trial
title_fullStr Multi‐omic molecular profiling guide’s efficacious treatment selection in refractory metastatic breast cancer: a prospective phase II clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Multi‐omic molecular profiling guide’s efficacious treatment selection in refractory metastatic breast cancer: a prospective phase II clinical trial
title_short Multi‐omic molecular profiling guide’s efficacious treatment selection in refractory metastatic breast cancer: a prospective phase II clinical trial
title_sort multi‐omic molecular profiling guide’s efficacious treatment selection in refractory metastatic breast cancer: a prospective phase ii clinical trial
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8732340/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34437759
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1878-0261.13091
work_keys_str_mv AT pierobonmariaelena multiomicmolecularprofilingguidesefficacioustreatmentselectioninrefractorymetastaticbreastcanceraprospectivephaseiiclinicaltrial
AT robertnicholasj multiomicmolecularprofilingguidesefficacioustreatmentselectioninrefractorymetastaticbreastcanceraprospectivephaseiiclinicaltrial
AT northfeltdonaldw multiomicmolecularprofilingguidesefficacioustreatmentselectioninrefractorymetastaticbreastcanceraprospectivephaseiiclinicaltrial
AT jahanzebmohammad multiomicmolecularprofilingguidesefficacioustreatmentselectioninrefractorymetastaticbreastcanceraprospectivephaseiiclinicaltrial
AT wongshukmei multiomicmolecularprofilingguidesefficacioustreatmentselectioninrefractorymetastaticbreastcanceraprospectivephaseiiclinicaltrial
AT hodgekimberlya multiomicmolecularprofilingguidesefficacioustreatmentselectioninrefractorymetastaticbreastcanceraprospectivephaseiiclinicaltrial
AT baldellielisa multiomicmolecularprofilingguidesefficacioustreatmentselectioninrefractorymetastaticbreastcanceraprospectivephaseiiclinicaltrial
AT aldrichjessica multiomicmolecularprofilingguidesefficacioustreatmentselectioninrefractorymetastaticbreastcanceraprospectivephaseiiclinicaltrial
AT craigdavidw multiomicmolecularprofilingguidesefficacioustreatmentselectioninrefractorymetastaticbreastcanceraprospectivephaseiiclinicaltrial
AT liottalancea multiomicmolecularprofilingguidesefficacioustreatmentselectioninrefractorymetastaticbreastcanceraprospectivephaseiiclinicaltrial
AT avramovicsanja multiomicmolecularprofilingguidesefficacioustreatmentselectioninrefractorymetastaticbreastcanceraprospectivephaseiiclinicaltrial
AT wojtusiakjanusz multiomicmolecularprofilingguidesefficacioustreatmentselectioninrefractorymetastaticbreastcanceraprospectivephaseiiclinicaltrial
AT alemifarrokh multiomicmolecularprofilingguidesefficacioustreatmentselectioninrefractorymetastaticbreastcanceraprospectivephaseiiclinicaltrial
AT wulfkuhlejuliad multiomicmolecularprofilingguidesefficacioustreatmentselectioninrefractorymetastaticbreastcanceraprospectivephaseiiclinicaltrial
AT bellosangela multiomicmolecularprofilingguidesefficacioustreatmentselectioninrefractorymetastaticbreastcanceraprospectivephaseiiclinicaltrial
AT gallagherrosai multiomicmolecularprofilingguidesefficacioustreatmentselectioninrefractorymetastaticbreastcanceraprospectivephaseiiclinicaltrial
AT arguellodavid multiomicmolecularprofilingguidesefficacioustreatmentselectioninrefractorymetastaticbreastcanceraprospectivephaseiiclinicaltrial
AT conradamber multiomicmolecularprofilingguidesefficacioustreatmentselectioninrefractorymetastaticbreastcanceraprospectivephaseiiclinicaltrial
AT kemkesariane multiomicmolecularprofilingguidesefficacioustreatmentselectioninrefractorymetastaticbreastcanceraprospectivephaseiiclinicaltrial
AT loeschdavidm multiomicmolecularprofilingguidesefficacioustreatmentselectioninrefractorymetastaticbreastcanceraprospectivephaseiiclinicaltrial
AT vocilalinda multiomicmolecularprofilingguidesefficacioustreatmentselectioninrefractorymetastaticbreastcanceraprospectivephaseiiclinicaltrial
AT dunetzbryant multiomicmolecularprofilingguidesefficacioustreatmentselectioninrefractorymetastaticbreastcanceraprospectivephaseiiclinicaltrial
AT carptenjohnd multiomicmolecularprofilingguidesefficacioustreatmentselectioninrefractorymetastaticbreastcanceraprospectivephaseiiclinicaltrial
AT petricoinemanuelf multiomicmolecularprofilingguidesefficacioustreatmentselectioninrefractorymetastaticbreastcanceraprospectivephaseiiclinicaltrial
AT anthonystephenp multiomicmolecularprofilingguidesefficacioustreatmentselectioninrefractorymetastaticbreastcanceraprospectivephaseiiclinicaltrial