Cargando…

Oral Mucosa vs. Penile Skin Flap in Substitution Urethroplasty for Anterior Urethral Strictures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness and safety of oral mucosa and penile skin flaps in the treatment of anterior urethral stricture. Methods: This meta-analysis was carried out according to the principle of preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ma, Yucheng, Jian, Zhong-Yu, Hu, Qibo, Luo, Zhumei, Jin, Tao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8732363/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35004838
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2021.803750
_version_ 1784627571240992768
author Ma, Yucheng
Jian, Zhong-Yu
Hu, Qibo
Luo, Zhumei
Jin, Tao
author_facet Ma, Yucheng
Jian, Zhong-Yu
Hu, Qibo
Luo, Zhumei
Jin, Tao
author_sort Ma, Yucheng
collection PubMed
description Background: The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness and safety of oral mucosa and penile skin flaps in the treatment of anterior urethral stricture. Methods: This meta-analysis was carried out according to the principle of preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) and registered at PROSPERO (CRD42021277688). The Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, CKNI databases were searched and reviewed up to Sep 2021. Quality evaluation was performed with Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) system for non-randomized studies and Cochrane stools for randomized studies. Data synthesis was conducted with RevMan 5.4 software (Cochrane) and a Stata 15.0 environment (Stata Corpor, College Station, TX, USA). Results: After the research screening, eight studies (comprising 445 patients) were finally included in the quantitative analysis. In the success rate comparison, there was no significant difference between oral mucosa and penile skin flaps (oral mucosa vs. penile skin flap, Mantel-Haenszel statistic [M-H] fixed model, OR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.47–1.34, P = 0.39). There was no significant difference in the post-operative complication comparison (oral mucosa vs. penile skin flap, Mantel-Haenszel statistic [M-H] fixed model, OR: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.40–1.16, P = 0.15). However, considering that the site of oral mucosa is far from the anterior urethra, it may have advantages in operation time through simultaneous operations (oral mucosa vs. penile skin flap, MD: −40.05, 95% CI: −79.42, −0.68, P = 0.046). Conclusion: When the oral mucosal graft was used in the anterior urethra urethroplasty, it had a similar success rate and post-operative complication rate, and oral mucosa substitution had a shorter operation time. This evidence-based medical research further supports the view that oral mucosa is the preferred substitution material for the anterior urethra urethroplasty.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8732363
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87323632022-01-07 Oral Mucosa vs. Penile Skin Flap in Substitution Urethroplasty for Anterior Urethral Strictures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Ma, Yucheng Jian, Zhong-Yu Hu, Qibo Luo, Zhumei Jin, Tao Front Surg Surgery Background: The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness and safety of oral mucosa and penile skin flaps in the treatment of anterior urethral stricture. Methods: This meta-analysis was carried out according to the principle of preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) and registered at PROSPERO (CRD42021277688). The Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, CKNI databases were searched and reviewed up to Sep 2021. Quality evaluation was performed with Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) system for non-randomized studies and Cochrane stools for randomized studies. Data synthesis was conducted with RevMan 5.4 software (Cochrane) and a Stata 15.0 environment (Stata Corpor, College Station, TX, USA). Results: After the research screening, eight studies (comprising 445 patients) were finally included in the quantitative analysis. In the success rate comparison, there was no significant difference between oral mucosa and penile skin flaps (oral mucosa vs. penile skin flap, Mantel-Haenszel statistic [M-H] fixed model, OR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.47–1.34, P = 0.39). There was no significant difference in the post-operative complication comparison (oral mucosa vs. penile skin flap, Mantel-Haenszel statistic [M-H] fixed model, OR: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.40–1.16, P = 0.15). However, considering that the site of oral mucosa is far from the anterior urethra, it may have advantages in operation time through simultaneous operations (oral mucosa vs. penile skin flap, MD: −40.05, 95% CI: −79.42, −0.68, P = 0.046). Conclusion: When the oral mucosal graft was used in the anterior urethra urethroplasty, it had a similar success rate and post-operative complication rate, and oral mucosa substitution had a shorter operation time. This evidence-based medical research further supports the view that oral mucosa is the preferred substitution material for the anterior urethra urethroplasty. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8732363/ /pubmed/35004838 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2021.803750 Text en Copyright © 2021 Ma, Jian, Hu, Luo and Jin. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Surgery
Ma, Yucheng
Jian, Zhong-Yu
Hu, Qibo
Luo, Zhumei
Jin, Tao
Oral Mucosa vs. Penile Skin Flap in Substitution Urethroplasty for Anterior Urethral Strictures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Oral Mucosa vs. Penile Skin Flap in Substitution Urethroplasty for Anterior Urethral Strictures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Oral Mucosa vs. Penile Skin Flap in Substitution Urethroplasty for Anterior Urethral Strictures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Oral Mucosa vs. Penile Skin Flap in Substitution Urethroplasty for Anterior Urethral Strictures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Oral Mucosa vs. Penile Skin Flap in Substitution Urethroplasty for Anterior Urethral Strictures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Oral Mucosa vs. Penile Skin Flap in Substitution Urethroplasty for Anterior Urethral Strictures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort oral mucosa vs. penile skin flap in substitution urethroplasty for anterior urethral strictures: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8732363/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35004838
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2021.803750
work_keys_str_mv AT mayucheng oralmucosavspenileskinflapinsubstitutionurethroplastyforanteriorurethralstricturesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jianzhongyu oralmucosavspenileskinflapinsubstitutionurethroplastyforanteriorurethralstricturesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT huqibo oralmucosavspenileskinflapinsubstitutionurethroplastyforanteriorurethralstricturesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT luozhumei oralmucosavspenileskinflapinsubstitutionurethroplastyforanteriorurethralstricturesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jintao oralmucosavspenileskinflapinsubstitutionurethroplastyforanteriorurethralstricturesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis