Cargando…

Vitrectomy vs. Spontaneous Closure for Traumatic Macular Hole: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the traumatic macular hole (TMH) closure rate and visual acuity (VA) improvement rate by comparing two treatment methods for TMH: vitrectomy and observation for spontaneous closure. Methods: PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science Libra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhou, Qi, Feng, Haoyue, Lv, Hongbin, Fu, Zhongmei, Xue, Yuyu, Ye, Hejiang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8732763/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35004717
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.735968
_version_ 1784627667978420224
author Zhou, Qi
Feng, Haoyue
Lv, Hongbin
Fu, Zhongmei
Xue, Yuyu
Ye, Hejiang
author_facet Zhou, Qi
Feng, Haoyue
Lv, Hongbin
Fu, Zhongmei
Xue, Yuyu
Ye, Hejiang
author_sort Zhou, Qi
collection PubMed
description Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the traumatic macular hole (TMH) closure rate and visual acuity (VA) improvement rate by comparing two treatment methods for TMH: vitrectomy and observation for spontaneous closure. Methods: PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science Library, Embase, CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, and Sino Med were systematically searched from their inception to June 10, 2021. Studies in the surgery group (n = 32) and studies in the observation group (n = 12) were meta-analyzed. The primary outcomes were the TMH closure and VA improvement rates in the surgery and observation groups. The secondary outcomes were best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) improvement in the surgery group. Stata software (version 15.1) was used for the analyses. Results: Thirty-six studies that included 1,009 eyes were selected for this meta-analysis, among which 33 were retrospective studies and 3 were prospective studies. The meta-analysis showed that the random-model pooled event rate for TMH closure was 0.37 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.26–0.48) in the observation group, while it was 0.9 (95% CI, 0.85–0.94) in the surgery group. The fixed-model pooled event rate for VA improvement was 0.39 (95% CI, 0.33–0.45) in the observation group, while the random-model pooled event rate of VA improvement for the surgery group was 0.72 (95% CI, 0.63–0.80). The pooled event rate for BCVA improvement in the surgery group was 0.39 (95% CI, 0.33–0.46). Conclusions: This meta-analysis suggests that TMH hole closure and VA improvement rates in the surgery group were significantly higher than those in the observation group. Vitrectomy is an effective method for treating TMH. However, further randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are required to evaluate the efficacy and safety of surgery and observation for TMH treatment. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/#recordDetails, identifier: CRD42021276684.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8732763
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87327632022-01-07 Vitrectomy vs. Spontaneous Closure for Traumatic Macular Hole: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Zhou, Qi Feng, Haoyue Lv, Hongbin Fu, Zhongmei Xue, Yuyu Ye, Hejiang Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the traumatic macular hole (TMH) closure rate and visual acuity (VA) improvement rate by comparing two treatment methods for TMH: vitrectomy and observation for spontaneous closure. Methods: PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science Library, Embase, CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, and Sino Med were systematically searched from their inception to June 10, 2021. Studies in the surgery group (n = 32) and studies in the observation group (n = 12) were meta-analyzed. The primary outcomes were the TMH closure and VA improvement rates in the surgery and observation groups. The secondary outcomes were best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) improvement in the surgery group. Stata software (version 15.1) was used for the analyses. Results: Thirty-six studies that included 1,009 eyes were selected for this meta-analysis, among which 33 were retrospective studies and 3 were prospective studies. The meta-analysis showed that the random-model pooled event rate for TMH closure was 0.37 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.26–0.48) in the observation group, while it was 0.9 (95% CI, 0.85–0.94) in the surgery group. The fixed-model pooled event rate for VA improvement was 0.39 (95% CI, 0.33–0.45) in the observation group, while the random-model pooled event rate of VA improvement for the surgery group was 0.72 (95% CI, 0.63–0.80). The pooled event rate for BCVA improvement in the surgery group was 0.39 (95% CI, 0.33–0.46). Conclusions: This meta-analysis suggests that TMH hole closure and VA improvement rates in the surgery group were significantly higher than those in the observation group. Vitrectomy is an effective method for treating TMH. However, further randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are required to evaluate the efficacy and safety of surgery and observation for TMH treatment. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/#recordDetails, identifier: CRD42021276684. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8732763/ /pubmed/35004717 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.735968 Text en Copyright © 2021 Zhou, Feng, Lv, Fu, Xue and Ye. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Medicine
Zhou, Qi
Feng, Haoyue
Lv, Hongbin
Fu, Zhongmei
Xue, Yuyu
Ye, Hejiang
Vitrectomy vs. Spontaneous Closure for Traumatic Macular Hole: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Vitrectomy vs. Spontaneous Closure for Traumatic Macular Hole: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Vitrectomy vs. Spontaneous Closure for Traumatic Macular Hole: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Vitrectomy vs. Spontaneous Closure for Traumatic Macular Hole: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Vitrectomy vs. Spontaneous Closure for Traumatic Macular Hole: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Vitrectomy vs. Spontaneous Closure for Traumatic Macular Hole: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort vitrectomy vs. spontaneous closure for traumatic macular hole: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8732763/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35004717
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.735968
work_keys_str_mv AT zhouqi vitrectomyvsspontaneousclosurefortraumaticmacularholeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT fenghaoyue vitrectomyvsspontaneousclosurefortraumaticmacularholeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lvhongbin vitrectomyvsspontaneousclosurefortraumaticmacularholeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT fuzhongmei vitrectomyvsspontaneousclosurefortraumaticmacularholeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT xueyuyu vitrectomyvsspontaneousclosurefortraumaticmacularholeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yehejiang vitrectomyvsspontaneousclosurefortraumaticmacularholeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis