Cargando…

Enthusiasm, concern and ambivalence in the Belgian public’s attitude towards in-vitro gametogenesis

Given the controversial nature of research into in-vitro gametogenesis (IVG), this study set out to investigate the current attitudes towards IVG in the general Belgian population in order to anticipate potential future barriers and misunderstandings. A questionnaire was developed and incorporated i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mertes, Heidi, Goethals, Tina, Segers, Seppe, Huysentruyt, Marie, Pennings, Guido, Provoost, Veerle
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8732790/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35024472
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rbms.2021.10.005
_version_ 1784627673808502784
author Mertes, Heidi
Goethals, Tina
Segers, Seppe
Huysentruyt, Marie
Pennings, Guido
Provoost, Veerle
author_facet Mertes, Heidi
Goethals, Tina
Segers, Seppe
Huysentruyt, Marie
Pennings, Guido
Provoost, Veerle
author_sort Mertes, Heidi
collection PubMed
description Given the controversial nature of research into in-vitro gametogenesis (IVG), this study set out to investigate the current attitudes towards IVG in the general Belgian population in order to anticipate potential future barriers and misunderstandings. A questionnaire was developed and incorporated into a web-based online survey and sent out to Belgians aged ≥ 18 years in September 2018 until a representative sample (by age, gender and region) of 1000 participants was reached. Respondents expressed an overall positive attitude towards IVG and its possible future applications, with the exception of the use of IVG in postmenopausal women. They were ambivalent about the importance of genetic parenthood and about the necessary experiments on animals and embryos to bring IVG to the clinic. While the willingness to accept greater risks for IVG than for other assisted reproductive technology treatments was low (17.5%), the use of spare in-vitro fertilization embryos to study those risks was acceptable for 55.8% of participants; embryo creation was acceptable for 38.1%; and experiments on mice and monkeys were acceptable for 45.3% and 30.4%, respectively. Finally, 85.6% of participants agreed that the Belgian Government should strictly regulate IVG. In conclusion, preclinical research into IVG and other reproductive technologies elicits a great diversity of attitudes towards the importance of genetic parenthood and the acceptability of embryo and animal research. There is a need for public dialogue on these topics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8732790
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87327902022-01-11 Enthusiasm, concern and ambivalence in the Belgian public’s attitude towards in-vitro gametogenesis Mertes, Heidi Goethals, Tina Segers, Seppe Huysentruyt, Marie Pennings, Guido Provoost, Veerle Reprod Biomed Soc Online Original Article Given the controversial nature of research into in-vitro gametogenesis (IVG), this study set out to investigate the current attitudes towards IVG in the general Belgian population in order to anticipate potential future barriers and misunderstandings. A questionnaire was developed and incorporated into a web-based online survey and sent out to Belgians aged ≥ 18 years in September 2018 until a representative sample (by age, gender and region) of 1000 participants was reached. Respondents expressed an overall positive attitude towards IVG and its possible future applications, with the exception of the use of IVG in postmenopausal women. They were ambivalent about the importance of genetic parenthood and about the necessary experiments on animals and embryos to bring IVG to the clinic. While the willingness to accept greater risks for IVG than for other assisted reproductive technology treatments was low (17.5%), the use of spare in-vitro fertilization embryos to study those risks was acceptable for 55.8% of participants; embryo creation was acceptable for 38.1%; and experiments on mice and monkeys were acceptable for 45.3% and 30.4%, respectively. Finally, 85.6% of participants agreed that the Belgian Government should strictly regulate IVG. In conclusion, preclinical research into IVG and other reproductive technologies elicits a great diversity of attitudes towards the importance of genetic parenthood and the acceptability of embryo and animal research. There is a need for public dialogue on these topics. Elsevier 2021-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8732790/ /pubmed/35024472 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rbms.2021.10.005 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Mertes, Heidi
Goethals, Tina
Segers, Seppe
Huysentruyt, Marie
Pennings, Guido
Provoost, Veerle
Enthusiasm, concern and ambivalence in the Belgian public’s attitude towards in-vitro gametogenesis
title Enthusiasm, concern and ambivalence in the Belgian public’s attitude towards in-vitro gametogenesis
title_full Enthusiasm, concern and ambivalence in the Belgian public’s attitude towards in-vitro gametogenesis
title_fullStr Enthusiasm, concern and ambivalence in the Belgian public’s attitude towards in-vitro gametogenesis
title_full_unstemmed Enthusiasm, concern and ambivalence in the Belgian public’s attitude towards in-vitro gametogenesis
title_short Enthusiasm, concern and ambivalence in the Belgian public’s attitude towards in-vitro gametogenesis
title_sort enthusiasm, concern and ambivalence in the belgian public’s attitude towards in-vitro gametogenesis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8732790/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35024472
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rbms.2021.10.005
work_keys_str_mv AT mertesheidi enthusiasmconcernandambivalenceinthebelgianpublicsattitudetowardsinvitrogametogenesis
AT goethalstina enthusiasmconcernandambivalenceinthebelgianpublicsattitudetowardsinvitrogametogenesis
AT segersseppe enthusiasmconcernandambivalenceinthebelgianpublicsattitudetowardsinvitrogametogenesis
AT huysentruytmarie enthusiasmconcernandambivalenceinthebelgianpublicsattitudetowardsinvitrogametogenesis
AT penningsguido enthusiasmconcernandambivalenceinthebelgianpublicsattitudetowardsinvitrogametogenesis
AT provoostveerle enthusiasmconcernandambivalenceinthebelgianpublicsattitudetowardsinvitrogametogenesis