Cargando…
Tumor response evaluation in patients with malignant melanoma undergoing immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy and prognosis prediction using (18)F-FDG PET/CT: multicenter study for comparison of EORTC, PERCIST, and imPERCIST
OBJECTIVE: In malignant melanoma patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy, three different FDG-PET criteria, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors (PERCIST), immunotherapy-modified PERCIST (imPERCIST), were co...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Singapore
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8732811/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34287739 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11604-021-01174-w |
_version_ | 1784627679050334208 |
---|---|
author | Kitajima, Kazuhiro Watabe, Tadashi Nakajo, Masatoyo Ishibashi, Mana Daisaki, Hiromitsu Soeda, Fumihiko Tanemura, Atsushi Kanekura, Takuro Yamazaki, Naoya Ito, Kimiteru |
author_facet | Kitajima, Kazuhiro Watabe, Tadashi Nakajo, Masatoyo Ishibashi, Mana Daisaki, Hiromitsu Soeda, Fumihiko Tanemura, Atsushi Kanekura, Takuro Yamazaki, Naoya Ito, Kimiteru |
author_sort | Kitajima, Kazuhiro |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: In malignant melanoma patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy, three different FDG-PET criteria, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors (PERCIST), immunotherapy-modified PERCIST (imPERCIST), were compared regarding response evaluation and prognosis prediction using standardized uptake value (SUV) harmonization of results obtained with various PET/CT scanners installed at different centers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Malignant melanoma patients (n = 27) underwent FDG-PET/CT examinations before and again 3 to 9 months after therapy initiation (nivolumab, n = 21; pembrolizumab, n = 6) with different PET scanners at five hospitals. EORTC, PERCIST, and imPERCIST criteria were used to evaluate therapeutic response, then concordance of the results was assessed using Cohen’s κ coefficient. Log-rank and Cox methods were employed to determine progression-free (PFS) and overall (OS) survival. RESULTS: Complete metabolic response (CMR)/partial metabolic response (PMR)/stable metabolic disease (SMD)/progressive metabolic disease (PMD) with harmonized EORTC, PERCIST, and imPERCIST was seen in 3/5/4/15, 4/5/3/15, and 4/5/5/13 patients, respectively. Nearly perfect concordance between each pair of criteria was noted (κ = 0.939–0.972). Twenty patients showed progression and 14 died from malignant melanoma after a median 19.2 months. Responders (CMR/PMR) showed significantly longer PFS and OS than non-responders (SMD/PMD) (harmonized EORTC: p < 0.0001 and p = 0.011; harmonized PERCIST: p < 0.0001 and p = 0.0012; harmonized imPERCIST: p < 0.0001 and p = 0.0012, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: All harmonized FDG-PET criteria (EORTC, PERCIST, imPERCIST) showed accuracy for response evaluation of ICI therapy and prediction of malignant melanoma patient prognosis. Additional studies to determine their value in larger study populations will be necessary. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8732811 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Singapore |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87328112022-01-18 Tumor response evaluation in patients with malignant melanoma undergoing immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy and prognosis prediction using (18)F-FDG PET/CT: multicenter study for comparison of EORTC, PERCIST, and imPERCIST Kitajima, Kazuhiro Watabe, Tadashi Nakajo, Masatoyo Ishibashi, Mana Daisaki, Hiromitsu Soeda, Fumihiko Tanemura, Atsushi Kanekura, Takuro Yamazaki, Naoya Ito, Kimiteru Jpn J Radiol Original Article OBJECTIVE: In malignant melanoma patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy, three different FDG-PET criteria, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors (PERCIST), immunotherapy-modified PERCIST (imPERCIST), were compared regarding response evaluation and prognosis prediction using standardized uptake value (SUV) harmonization of results obtained with various PET/CT scanners installed at different centers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Malignant melanoma patients (n = 27) underwent FDG-PET/CT examinations before and again 3 to 9 months after therapy initiation (nivolumab, n = 21; pembrolizumab, n = 6) with different PET scanners at five hospitals. EORTC, PERCIST, and imPERCIST criteria were used to evaluate therapeutic response, then concordance of the results was assessed using Cohen’s κ coefficient. Log-rank and Cox methods were employed to determine progression-free (PFS) and overall (OS) survival. RESULTS: Complete metabolic response (CMR)/partial metabolic response (PMR)/stable metabolic disease (SMD)/progressive metabolic disease (PMD) with harmonized EORTC, PERCIST, and imPERCIST was seen in 3/5/4/15, 4/5/3/15, and 4/5/5/13 patients, respectively. Nearly perfect concordance between each pair of criteria was noted (κ = 0.939–0.972). Twenty patients showed progression and 14 died from malignant melanoma after a median 19.2 months. Responders (CMR/PMR) showed significantly longer PFS and OS than non-responders (SMD/PMD) (harmonized EORTC: p < 0.0001 and p = 0.011; harmonized PERCIST: p < 0.0001 and p = 0.0012; harmonized imPERCIST: p < 0.0001 and p = 0.0012, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: All harmonized FDG-PET criteria (EORTC, PERCIST, imPERCIST) showed accuracy for response evaluation of ICI therapy and prediction of malignant melanoma patient prognosis. Additional studies to determine their value in larger study populations will be necessary. Springer Singapore 2021-07-21 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8732811/ /pubmed/34287739 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11604-021-01174-w Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Kitajima, Kazuhiro Watabe, Tadashi Nakajo, Masatoyo Ishibashi, Mana Daisaki, Hiromitsu Soeda, Fumihiko Tanemura, Atsushi Kanekura, Takuro Yamazaki, Naoya Ito, Kimiteru Tumor response evaluation in patients with malignant melanoma undergoing immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy and prognosis prediction using (18)F-FDG PET/CT: multicenter study for comparison of EORTC, PERCIST, and imPERCIST |
title | Tumor response evaluation in patients with malignant melanoma undergoing immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy and prognosis prediction using (18)F-FDG PET/CT: multicenter study for comparison of EORTC, PERCIST, and imPERCIST |
title_full | Tumor response evaluation in patients with malignant melanoma undergoing immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy and prognosis prediction using (18)F-FDG PET/CT: multicenter study for comparison of EORTC, PERCIST, and imPERCIST |
title_fullStr | Tumor response evaluation in patients with malignant melanoma undergoing immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy and prognosis prediction using (18)F-FDG PET/CT: multicenter study for comparison of EORTC, PERCIST, and imPERCIST |
title_full_unstemmed | Tumor response evaluation in patients with malignant melanoma undergoing immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy and prognosis prediction using (18)F-FDG PET/CT: multicenter study for comparison of EORTC, PERCIST, and imPERCIST |
title_short | Tumor response evaluation in patients with malignant melanoma undergoing immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy and prognosis prediction using (18)F-FDG PET/CT: multicenter study for comparison of EORTC, PERCIST, and imPERCIST |
title_sort | tumor response evaluation in patients with malignant melanoma undergoing immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy and prognosis prediction using (18)f-fdg pet/ct: multicenter study for comparison of eortc, percist, and impercist |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8732811/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34287739 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11604-021-01174-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kitajimakazuhiro tumorresponseevaluationinpatientswithmalignantmelanomaundergoingimmunecheckpointinhibitortherapyandprognosispredictionusing18ffdgpetctmulticenterstudyforcomparisonofeortcpercistandimpercist AT watabetadashi tumorresponseevaluationinpatientswithmalignantmelanomaundergoingimmunecheckpointinhibitortherapyandprognosispredictionusing18ffdgpetctmulticenterstudyforcomparisonofeortcpercistandimpercist AT nakajomasatoyo tumorresponseevaluationinpatientswithmalignantmelanomaundergoingimmunecheckpointinhibitortherapyandprognosispredictionusing18ffdgpetctmulticenterstudyforcomparisonofeortcpercistandimpercist AT ishibashimana tumorresponseevaluationinpatientswithmalignantmelanomaundergoingimmunecheckpointinhibitortherapyandprognosispredictionusing18ffdgpetctmulticenterstudyforcomparisonofeortcpercistandimpercist AT daisakihiromitsu tumorresponseevaluationinpatientswithmalignantmelanomaundergoingimmunecheckpointinhibitortherapyandprognosispredictionusing18ffdgpetctmulticenterstudyforcomparisonofeortcpercistandimpercist AT soedafumihiko tumorresponseevaluationinpatientswithmalignantmelanomaundergoingimmunecheckpointinhibitortherapyandprognosispredictionusing18ffdgpetctmulticenterstudyforcomparisonofeortcpercistandimpercist AT tanemuraatsushi tumorresponseevaluationinpatientswithmalignantmelanomaundergoingimmunecheckpointinhibitortherapyandprognosispredictionusing18ffdgpetctmulticenterstudyforcomparisonofeortcpercistandimpercist AT kanekuratakuro tumorresponseevaluationinpatientswithmalignantmelanomaundergoingimmunecheckpointinhibitortherapyandprognosispredictionusing18ffdgpetctmulticenterstudyforcomparisonofeortcpercistandimpercist AT yamazakinaoya tumorresponseevaluationinpatientswithmalignantmelanomaundergoingimmunecheckpointinhibitortherapyandprognosispredictionusing18ffdgpetctmulticenterstudyforcomparisonofeortcpercistandimpercist AT itokimiteru tumorresponseevaluationinpatientswithmalignantmelanomaundergoingimmunecheckpointinhibitortherapyandprognosispredictionusing18ffdgpetctmulticenterstudyforcomparisonofeortcpercistandimpercist |