Cargando…

Tumor response evaluation in patients with malignant melanoma undergoing immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy and prognosis prediction using (18)F-FDG PET/CT: multicenter study for comparison of EORTC, PERCIST, and imPERCIST

OBJECTIVE: In malignant melanoma patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy, three different FDG-PET criteria, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors (PERCIST), immunotherapy-modified PERCIST (imPERCIST), were co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kitajima, Kazuhiro, Watabe, Tadashi, Nakajo, Masatoyo, Ishibashi, Mana, Daisaki, Hiromitsu, Soeda, Fumihiko, Tanemura, Atsushi, Kanekura, Takuro, Yamazaki, Naoya, Ito, Kimiteru
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Singapore 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8732811/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34287739
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11604-021-01174-w
_version_ 1784627679050334208
author Kitajima, Kazuhiro
Watabe, Tadashi
Nakajo, Masatoyo
Ishibashi, Mana
Daisaki, Hiromitsu
Soeda, Fumihiko
Tanemura, Atsushi
Kanekura, Takuro
Yamazaki, Naoya
Ito, Kimiteru
author_facet Kitajima, Kazuhiro
Watabe, Tadashi
Nakajo, Masatoyo
Ishibashi, Mana
Daisaki, Hiromitsu
Soeda, Fumihiko
Tanemura, Atsushi
Kanekura, Takuro
Yamazaki, Naoya
Ito, Kimiteru
author_sort Kitajima, Kazuhiro
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: In malignant melanoma patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy, three different FDG-PET criteria, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors (PERCIST), immunotherapy-modified PERCIST (imPERCIST), were compared regarding response evaluation and prognosis prediction using standardized uptake value (SUV) harmonization of results obtained with various PET/CT scanners installed at different centers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Malignant melanoma patients (n = 27) underwent FDG-PET/CT examinations before and again 3 to 9 months after therapy initiation (nivolumab, n = 21; pembrolizumab, n = 6) with different PET scanners at five hospitals. EORTC, PERCIST, and imPERCIST criteria were used to evaluate therapeutic response, then concordance of the results was assessed using Cohen’s κ coefficient. Log-rank and Cox methods were employed to determine progression-free (PFS) and overall (OS) survival. RESULTS: Complete metabolic response (CMR)/partial metabolic response (PMR)/stable metabolic disease (SMD)/progressive metabolic disease (PMD) with harmonized EORTC, PERCIST, and imPERCIST was seen in 3/5/4/15, 4/5/3/15, and 4/5/5/13 patients, respectively. Nearly perfect concordance between each pair of criteria was noted (κ = 0.939–0.972). Twenty patients showed progression and 14 died from malignant melanoma after a median 19.2 months. Responders (CMR/PMR) showed significantly longer PFS and OS than non-responders (SMD/PMD) (harmonized EORTC: p < 0.0001 and p = 0.011; harmonized PERCIST: p < 0.0001 and p = 0.0012; harmonized imPERCIST: p < 0.0001 and p = 0.0012, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: All harmonized FDG-PET criteria (EORTC, PERCIST, imPERCIST) showed accuracy for response evaluation of ICI therapy and prediction of malignant melanoma patient prognosis. Additional studies to determine their value in larger study populations will be necessary.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8732811
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Singapore
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87328112022-01-18 Tumor response evaluation in patients with malignant melanoma undergoing immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy and prognosis prediction using (18)F-FDG PET/CT: multicenter study for comparison of EORTC, PERCIST, and imPERCIST Kitajima, Kazuhiro Watabe, Tadashi Nakajo, Masatoyo Ishibashi, Mana Daisaki, Hiromitsu Soeda, Fumihiko Tanemura, Atsushi Kanekura, Takuro Yamazaki, Naoya Ito, Kimiteru Jpn J Radiol Original Article OBJECTIVE: In malignant melanoma patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy, three different FDG-PET criteria, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors (PERCIST), immunotherapy-modified PERCIST (imPERCIST), were compared regarding response evaluation and prognosis prediction using standardized uptake value (SUV) harmonization of results obtained with various PET/CT scanners installed at different centers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Malignant melanoma patients (n = 27) underwent FDG-PET/CT examinations before and again 3 to 9 months after therapy initiation (nivolumab, n = 21; pembrolizumab, n = 6) with different PET scanners at five hospitals. EORTC, PERCIST, and imPERCIST criteria were used to evaluate therapeutic response, then concordance of the results was assessed using Cohen’s κ coefficient. Log-rank and Cox methods were employed to determine progression-free (PFS) and overall (OS) survival. RESULTS: Complete metabolic response (CMR)/partial metabolic response (PMR)/stable metabolic disease (SMD)/progressive metabolic disease (PMD) with harmonized EORTC, PERCIST, and imPERCIST was seen in 3/5/4/15, 4/5/3/15, and 4/5/5/13 patients, respectively. Nearly perfect concordance between each pair of criteria was noted (κ = 0.939–0.972). Twenty patients showed progression and 14 died from malignant melanoma after a median 19.2 months. Responders (CMR/PMR) showed significantly longer PFS and OS than non-responders (SMD/PMD) (harmonized EORTC: p < 0.0001 and p = 0.011; harmonized PERCIST: p < 0.0001 and p = 0.0012; harmonized imPERCIST: p < 0.0001 and p = 0.0012, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: All harmonized FDG-PET criteria (EORTC, PERCIST, imPERCIST) showed accuracy for response evaluation of ICI therapy and prediction of malignant melanoma patient prognosis. Additional studies to determine their value in larger study populations will be necessary. Springer Singapore 2021-07-21 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8732811/ /pubmed/34287739 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11604-021-01174-w Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Kitajima, Kazuhiro
Watabe, Tadashi
Nakajo, Masatoyo
Ishibashi, Mana
Daisaki, Hiromitsu
Soeda, Fumihiko
Tanemura, Atsushi
Kanekura, Takuro
Yamazaki, Naoya
Ito, Kimiteru
Tumor response evaluation in patients with malignant melanoma undergoing immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy and prognosis prediction using (18)F-FDG PET/CT: multicenter study for comparison of EORTC, PERCIST, and imPERCIST
title Tumor response evaluation in patients with malignant melanoma undergoing immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy and prognosis prediction using (18)F-FDG PET/CT: multicenter study for comparison of EORTC, PERCIST, and imPERCIST
title_full Tumor response evaluation in patients with malignant melanoma undergoing immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy and prognosis prediction using (18)F-FDG PET/CT: multicenter study for comparison of EORTC, PERCIST, and imPERCIST
title_fullStr Tumor response evaluation in patients with malignant melanoma undergoing immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy and prognosis prediction using (18)F-FDG PET/CT: multicenter study for comparison of EORTC, PERCIST, and imPERCIST
title_full_unstemmed Tumor response evaluation in patients with malignant melanoma undergoing immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy and prognosis prediction using (18)F-FDG PET/CT: multicenter study for comparison of EORTC, PERCIST, and imPERCIST
title_short Tumor response evaluation in patients with malignant melanoma undergoing immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy and prognosis prediction using (18)F-FDG PET/CT: multicenter study for comparison of EORTC, PERCIST, and imPERCIST
title_sort tumor response evaluation in patients with malignant melanoma undergoing immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy and prognosis prediction using (18)f-fdg pet/ct: multicenter study for comparison of eortc, percist, and impercist
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8732811/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34287739
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11604-021-01174-w
work_keys_str_mv AT kitajimakazuhiro tumorresponseevaluationinpatientswithmalignantmelanomaundergoingimmunecheckpointinhibitortherapyandprognosispredictionusing18ffdgpetctmulticenterstudyforcomparisonofeortcpercistandimpercist
AT watabetadashi tumorresponseevaluationinpatientswithmalignantmelanomaundergoingimmunecheckpointinhibitortherapyandprognosispredictionusing18ffdgpetctmulticenterstudyforcomparisonofeortcpercistandimpercist
AT nakajomasatoyo tumorresponseevaluationinpatientswithmalignantmelanomaundergoingimmunecheckpointinhibitortherapyandprognosispredictionusing18ffdgpetctmulticenterstudyforcomparisonofeortcpercistandimpercist
AT ishibashimana tumorresponseevaluationinpatientswithmalignantmelanomaundergoingimmunecheckpointinhibitortherapyandprognosispredictionusing18ffdgpetctmulticenterstudyforcomparisonofeortcpercistandimpercist
AT daisakihiromitsu tumorresponseevaluationinpatientswithmalignantmelanomaundergoingimmunecheckpointinhibitortherapyandprognosispredictionusing18ffdgpetctmulticenterstudyforcomparisonofeortcpercistandimpercist
AT soedafumihiko tumorresponseevaluationinpatientswithmalignantmelanomaundergoingimmunecheckpointinhibitortherapyandprognosispredictionusing18ffdgpetctmulticenterstudyforcomparisonofeortcpercistandimpercist
AT tanemuraatsushi tumorresponseevaluationinpatientswithmalignantmelanomaundergoingimmunecheckpointinhibitortherapyandprognosispredictionusing18ffdgpetctmulticenterstudyforcomparisonofeortcpercistandimpercist
AT kanekuratakuro tumorresponseevaluationinpatientswithmalignantmelanomaundergoingimmunecheckpointinhibitortherapyandprognosispredictionusing18ffdgpetctmulticenterstudyforcomparisonofeortcpercistandimpercist
AT yamazakinaoya tumorresponseevaluationinpatientswithmalignantmelanomaundergoingimmunecheckpointinhibitortherapyandprognosispredictionusing18ffdgpetctmulticenterstudyforcomparisonofeortcpercistandimpercist
AT itokimiteru tumorresponseevaluationinpatientswithmalignantmelanomaundergoingimmunecheckpointinhibitortherapyandprognosispredictionusing18ffdgpetctmulticenterstudyforcomparisonofeortcpercistandimpercist