Cargando…
Does implant removal of superior clavicle plate osteosynthesis affect the functional outcome: a prospective trial
BACKGROUND: Elective implant removal (IR) accounts for up to 30% of all orthopaedic surgeries. While there is general acceptance about the need of implant removal for obvious reasons, such as infections or implant failure, little is known about the beneficial aspects in cases of minor reasons such a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8732891/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33130933 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-020-03669-z |
_version_ | 1784627697922605056 |
---|---|
author | Wurm, Markus Beirer, Marc Zyskowski, Michael Völk, Christopher Schwarz, Arthur Biberthaler, Peter Kirchhoff, Chlodwig Crönlein, Moritz |
author_facet | Wurm, Markus Beirer, Marc Zyskowski, Michael Völk, Christopher Schwarz, Arthur Biberthaler, Peter Kirchhoff, Chlodwig Crönlein, Moritz |
author_sort | Wurm, Markus |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Elective implant removal (IR) accounts for up to 30% of all orthopaedic surgeries. While there is general acceptance about the need of implant removal for obvious reasons, such as infections or implant failure, little is known about the beneficial aspects in cases of minor reasons such as patients’ wish for IR. Therefore, we initiated this study to define patients’ benefit of elective implant removal following plate osteosynthesis of displaced clavicle fractures. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Prospective evaluation of patients was conducted before implant removal and 6 weeks postoperative. Subjective and objective criteria included pain rating on a visual analogue scale (VAS) and active range of motion (ROM) pre- and 6 weeks postoperative. Functional scoring included Constant-Murley Score, DASH (Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand Score), MSQ (Munich Shoulder Questionnaire) and SPADI (Shoulder Pain and Disability Index). RESULTS: 37 patients were prospectively enrolled in this study and implant removal was performed after 16 ± 6.1 months. No re-fractures nor other complications were detected during routine follow up. Functional outcome increased through all scores (Constant score 73.3 ± 14.6 preoperative to 87.4 ± 12.0 postoperative (p = 0.000), MSQ 85.0 ± 7.3 preoperative to 91.8 ± 9.0 postoperative (p = 0.005), DASH Score 7.4 ± 8.2 preoperative to 5.7 ± 9.5 postoperative (p = 0.414), SPADI 93.4 ± 6.6 preoperative to 94.0 ± 10.1 postoperative (p = 0.734). CONCLUSIONS: Discomfort during daily activities or performing sports as well as limited range of motion were the main reasons for patients’ wish for implant removal. We found increased functional outcome parameters and decreased irritation after implant removal. Therefore we suggest implant removal in case of patients’ wish and completed fracture consolidation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial registration no: NCT04343118, Retrospective registered: www.clinicaltrials.gov. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8732891 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87328912022-01-18 Does implant removal of superior clavicle plate osteosynthesis affect the functional outcome: a prospective trial Wurm, Markus Beirer, Marc Zyskowski, Michael Völk, Christopher Schwarz, Arthur Biberthaler, Peter Kirchhoff, Chlodwig Crönlein, Moritz Arch Orthop Trauma Surg Trauma Surgery BACKGROUND: Elective implant removal (IR) accounts for up to 30% of all orthopaedic surgeries. While there is general acceptance about the need of implant removal for obvious reasons, such as infections or implant failure, little is known about the beneficial aspects in cases of minor reasons such as patients’ wish for IR. Therefore, we initiated this study to define patients’ benefit of elective implant removal following plate osteosynthesis of displaced clavicle fractures. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Prospective evaluation of patients was conducted before implant removal and 6 weeks postoperative. Subjective and objective criteria included pain rating on a visual analogue scale (VAS) and active range of motion (ROM) pre- and 6 weeks postoperative. Functional scoring included Constant-Murley Score, DASH (Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand Score), MSQ (Munich Shoulder Questionnaire) and SPADI (Shoulder Pain and Disability Index). RESULTS: 37 patients were prospectively enrolled in this study and implant removal was performed after 16 ± 6.1 months. No re-fractures nor other complications were detected during routine follow up. Functional outcome increased through all scores (Constant score 73.3 ± 14.6 preoperative to 87.4 ± 12.0 postoperative (p = 0.000), MSQ 85.0 ± 7.3 preoperative to 91.8 ± 9.0 postoperative (p = 0.005), DASH Score 7.4 ± 8.2 preoperative to 5.7 ± 9.5 postoperative (p = 0.414), SPADI 93.4 ± 6.6 preoperative to 94.0 ± 10.1 postoperative (p = 0.734). CONCLUSIONS: Discomfort during daily activities or performing sports as well as limited range of motion were the main reasons for patients’ wish for implant removal. We found increased functional outcome parameters and decreased irritation after implant removal. Therefore we suggest implant removal in case of patients’ wish and completed fracture consolidation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial registration no: NCT04343118, Retrospective registered: www.clinicaltrials.gov. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-11-01 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8732891/ /pubmed/33130933 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-020-03669-z Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Trauma Surgery Wurm, Markus Beirer, Marc Zyskowski, Michael Völk, Christopher Schwarz, Arthur Biberthaler, Peter Kirchhoff, Chlodwig Crönlein, Moritz Does implant removal of superior clavicle plate osteosynthesis affect the functional outcome: a prospective trial |
title | Does implant removal of superior clavicle plate osteosynthesis affect the functional outcome: a prospective trial |
title_full | Does implant removal of superior clavicle plate osteosynthesis affect the functional outcome: a prospective trial |
title_fullStr | Does implant removal of superior clavicle plate osteosynthesis affect the functional outcome: a prospective trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Does implant removal of superior clavicle plate osteosynthesis affect the functional outcome: a prospective trial |
title_short | Does implant removal of superior clavicle plate osteosynthesis affect the functional outcome: a prospective trial |
title_sort | does implant removal of superior clavicle plate osteosynthesis affect the functional outcome: a prospective trial |
topic | Trauma Surgery |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8732891/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33130933 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-020-03669-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wurmmarkus doesimplantremovalofsuperiorclavicleplateosteosynthesisaffectthefunctionaloutcomeaprospectivetrial AT beirermarc doesimplantremovalofsuperiorclavicleplateosteosynthesisaffectthefunctionaloutcomeaprospectivetrial AT zyskowskimichael doesimplantremovalofsuperiorclavicleplateosteosynthesisaffectthefunctionaloutcomeaprospectivetrial AT volkchristopher doesimplantremovalofsuperiorclavicleplateosteosynthesisaffectthefunctionaloutcomeaprospectivetrial AT schwarzarthur doesimplantremovalofsuperiorclavicleplateosteosynthesisaffectthefunctionaloutcomeaprospectivetrial AT biberthalerpeter doesimplantremovalofsuperiorclavicleplateosteosynthesisaffectthefunctionaloutcomeaprospectivetrial AT kirchhoffchlodwig doesimplantremovalofsuperiorclavicleplateosteosynthesisaffectthefunctionaloutcomeaprospectivetrial AT cronleinmoritz doesimplantremovalofsuperiorclavicleplateosteosynthesisaffectthefunctionaloutcomeaprospectivetrial |