Cargando…
A prospective cohort study of rituximab in the treatment of refractory nephrotic syndrome
OBJECTIVE: To explore the efficacy and safety of rituximab (RTX) in the treatment of autoimmune nephropathy manifested as refractory nephrotic syndrome (RNS). METHODS: A single-center prospective cohort study was conducted on RNS patients treated with RTX between March 2017 and December 2019. The su...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8732927/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33905043 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11255-021-02860-4 |
Sumario: | OBJECTIVE: To explore the efficacy and safety of rituximab (RTX) in the treatment of autoimmune nephropathy manifested as refractory nephrotic syndrome (RNS). METHODS: A single-center prospective cohort study was conducted on RNS patients treated with RTX between March 2017 and December 2019. The subjects were divided into the primary nephropathy (PN) group and the secondary nephropathy (SN) group. Based on the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) before RTX treatment, the SN group was then divided into the SN-1 group (eGFR ≥ 30 ml/min) and the SN-2 group (eGFR < 30 ml/min). Biochemical parameters and clinical data were recorded during follow-up. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients were followed up for at least 6 months. The overall remission rates were 65%, 66.7%, 27.3% in the PN, SN-1, and SN-2 groups, respectively (P = 0.022). Kaplan–Meier analysis showed a significant difference of the renal survival among the three subgroups (P < 0.001). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that eGFR value before treatment was an independent predictor (HR 0.919, 95%CI 0.863–0.979) for renal survival. In terms of adverse events, infection accounted for 56.6%. The incidence of severe infection was 10%, 25% and 50% in PN group, SN-1 group and SN-2 group, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: RTX may be a promising option in RNS patients with eGFR ≥ 30 ml/min/1.73m(2). However, it has little effect on prognosis in patients with secondary RNS with eGFR < 30 ml/min/1.73m(2), but with a high risk of severe infection. |
---|