Cargando…

Safety and Effectiveness of Direct Oral Anticoagulants vs. Warfarin in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Endoscopy-Diagnosed Peptic Ulcer

Background: Patients with active peptic ulcer (PU) were excluded from direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) trials for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). This study evaluated the safety and effectiveness of DOACs in AF patients with active, inactive and no peptic ulcer (PU). Met...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Chun-Li, Huang, Chien-Hao, Wu, Victor Chien-Chia, Huang, Ya-Chi, Wang, Hsiang-Sheng, Kuo, Chang-Fu, Chu, Pao-Hsien, Wen, Ming-Shien, Chen, Ying-Jen, Huang, Yu-Tung, Chang, Shang-Hung
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8732988/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35004890
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2021.774072
_version_ 1784627720428191744
author Wang, Chun-Li
Huang, Chien-Hao
Wu, Victor Chien-Chia
Huang, Ya-Chi
Wang, Hsiang-Sheng
Kuo, Chang-Fu
Chu, Pao-Hsien
Wen, Ming-Shien
Chen, Ying-Jen
Huang, Yu-Tung
Chang, Shang-Hung
author_facet Wang, Chun-Li
Huang, Chien-Hao
Wu, Victor Chien-Chia
Huang, Ya-Chi
Wang, Hsiang-Sheng
Kuo, Chang-Fu
Chu, Pao-Hsien
Wen, Ming-Shien
Chen, Ying-Jen
Huang, Yu-Tung
Chang, Shang-Hung
author_sort Wang, Chun-Li
collection PubMed
description Background: Patients with active peptic ulcer (PU) were excluded from direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) trials for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). This study evaluated the safety and effectiveness of DOACs in AF patients with active, inactive and no peptic ulcer (PU). Methods: This study accessed electronic medical records from January 1, 2009 to May 31, 2019 at a multi-center healthcare provider in Taiwan and involved 2,955 AF patients who had undergone esophagogastroduodenoscopy ≤ 1 year before anticoagulation. Subjects were classified into 3 groups: active (n = 237), inactive (n = 828) and no-PU (n = 1,890) groups. We compared the risks of major bleeding, gastrointestinal bleeding, and ischemic stroke/systemic embolism (IS/SE) between DOACs and warfarin among the 3 groups. Results: In the active PU group, there were no significant differences in the risks of major bleeding [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.65, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.08–4.98, p = 0.676], gastrointestinal bleeding (HR = 0.65, 95% CI 0.08–4.98, p = 0.676) and IS/SE (HR = 2.58; 95% CI 0.53–12.70, p = 0.243) between DOAC and warfarin (as the reference). In the inactive PU group, there were no significant differences in the risks of major bleeding (HR = 0.36, 95% CI 0.09–1.39, p = 0.138), gastrointestinal bleeding (HR = 0.21, 95% CI 0.02–1.80, p = 0.153), and IS/SE (HR = 1.04, 95% CI 0.39–2.82, p = 0.934) between DOAC and warfarin (as the reference). In the no-PU group, DOACs were associated with lower risk of major bleeding (HR = 0.26, 95% CI 0.12–0.53, p < 0.001), gastrointestinal bleeding (HR = 0.25, 95% CI 0.01–0.59, p = 0.002), and similar risk of IS/SE (HR = 0.92, 95% CI 0.55–1.54, p = 0.757) compared to warfarin. Conclusions: DOACs were as effective as warfarin in preventing IS/SE irrespective of PU status and safer than warfarin in reducing major bleeding in the no-PU group. In patients with active or inactive PUs, DOAC and warfarin were not significantly different in their effects on major bleeding or gastrointestinal bleeding.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8732988
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87329882022-01-07 Safety and Effectiveness of Direct Oral Anticoagulants vs. Warfarin in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Endoscopy-Diagnosed Peptic Ulcer Wang, Chun-Li Huang, Chien-Hao Wu, Victor Chien-Chia Huang, Ya-Chi Wang, Hsiang-Sheng Kuo, Chang-Fu Chu, Pao-Hsien Wen, Ming-Shien Chen, Ying-Jen Huang, Yu-Tung Chang, Shang-Hung Front Cardiovasc Med Cardiovascular Medicine Background: Patients with active peptic ulcer (PU) were excluded from direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) trials for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). This study evaluated the safety and effectiveness of DOACs in AF patients with active, inactive and no peptic ulcer (PU). Methods: This study accessed electronic medical records from January 1, 2009 to May 31, 2019 at a multi-center healthcare provider in Taiwan and involved 2,955 AF patients who had undergone esophagogastroduodenoscopy ≤ 1 year before anticoagulation. Subjects were classified into 3 groups: active (n = 237), inactive (n = 828) and no-PU (n = 1,890) groups. We compared the risks of major bleeding, gastrointestinal bleeding, and ischemic stroke/systemic embolism (IS/SE) between DOACs and warfarin among the 3 groups. Results: In the active PU group, there were no significant differences in the risks of major bleeding [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.65, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.08–4.98, p = 0.676], gastrointestinal bleeding (HR = 0.65, 95% CI 0.08–4.98, p = 0.676) and IS/SE (HR = 2.58; 95% CI 0.53–12.70, p = 0.243) between DOAC and warfarin (as the reference). In the inactive PU group, there were no significant differences in the risks of major bleeding (HR = 0.36, 95% CI 0.09–1.39, p = 0.138), gastrointestinal bleeding (HR = 0.21, 95% CI 0.02–1.80, p = 0.153), and IS/SE (HR = 1.04, 95% CI 0.39–2.82, p = 0.934) between DOAC and warfarin (as the reference). In the no-PU group, DOACs were associated with lower risk of major bleeding (HR = 0.26, 95% CI 0.12–0.53, p < 0.001), gastrointestinal bleeding (HR = 0.25, 95% CI 0.01–0.59, p = 0.002), and similar risk of IS/SE (HR = 0.92, 95% CI 0.55–1.54, p = 0.757) compared to warfarin. Conclusions: DOACs were as effective as warfarin in preventing IS/SE irrespective of PU status and safer than warfarin in reducing major bleeding in the no-PU group. In patients with active or inactive PUs, DOAC and warfarin were not significantly different in their effects on major bleeding or gastrointestinal bleeding. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8732988/ /pubmed/35004890 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2021.774072 Text en Copyright © 2021 Wang, Huang, Wu, Huang, Wang, Kuo, Chu, Wen, Chen, Huang and Chang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Cardiovascular Medicine
Wang, Chun-Li
Huang, Chien-Hao
Wu, Victor Chien-Chia
Huang, Ya-Chi
Wang, Hsiang-Sheng
Kuo, Chang-Fu
Chu, Pao-Hsien
Wen, Ming-Shien
Chen, Ying-Jen
Huang, Yu-Tung
Chang, Shang-Hung
Safety and Effectiveness of Direct Oral Anticoagulants vs. Warfarin in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Endoscopy-Diagnosed Peptic Ulcer
title Safety and Effectiveness of Direct Oral Anticoagulants vs. Warfarin in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Endoscopy-Diagnosed Peptic Ulcer
title_full Safety and Effectiveness of Direct Oral Anticoagulants vs. Warfarin in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Endoscopy-Diagnosed Peptic Ulcer
title_fullStr Safety and Effectiveness of Direct Oral Anticoagulants vs. Warfarin in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Endoscopy-Diagnosed Peptic Ulcer
title_full_unstemmed Safety and Effectiveness of Direct Oral Anticoagulants vs. Warfarin in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Endoscopy-Diagnosed Peptic Ulcer
title_short Safety and Effectiveness of Direct Oral Anticoagulants vs. Warfarin in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Endoscopy-Diagnosed Peptic Ulcer
title_sort safety and effectiveness of direct oral anticoagulants vs. warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation and endoscopy-diagnosed peptic ulcer
topic Cardiovascular Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8732988/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35004890
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2021.774072
work_keys_str_mv AT wangchunli safetyandeffectivenessofdirectoralanticoagulantsvswarfarininpatientswithatrialfibrillationandendoscopydiagnosedpepticulcer
AT huangchienhao safetyandeffectivenessofdirectoralanticoagulantsvswarfarininpatientswithatrialfibrillationandendoscopydiagnosedpepticulcer
AT wuvictorchienchia safetyandeffectivenessofdirectoralanticoagulantsvswarfarininpatientswithatrialfibrillationandendoscopydiagnosedpepticulcer
AT huangyachi safetyandeffectivenessofdirectoralanticoagulantsvswarfarininpatientswithatrialfibrillationandendoscopydiagnosedpepticulcer
AT wanghsiangsheng safetyandeffectivenessofdirectoralanticoagulantsvswarfarininpatientswithatrialfibrillationandendoscopydiagnosedpepticulcer
AT kuochangfu safetyandeffectivenessofdirectoralanticoagulantsvswarfarininpatientswithatrialfibrillationandendoscopydiagnosedpepticulcer
AT chupaohsien safetyandeffectivenessofdirectoralanticoagulantsvswarfarininpatientswithatrialfibrillationandendoscopydiagnosedpepticulcer
AT wenmingshien safetyandeffectivenessofdirectoralanticoagulantsvswarfarininpatientswithatrialfibrillationandendoscopydiagnosedpepticulcer
AT chenyingjen safetyandeffectivenessofdirectoralanticoagulantsvswarfarininpatientswithatrialfibrillationandendoscopydiagnosedpepticulcer
AT huangyutung safetyandeffectivenessofdirectoralanticoagulantsvswarfarininpatientswithatrialfibrillationandendoscopydiagnosedpepticulcer
AT changshanghung safetyandeffectivenessofdirectoralanticoagulantsvswarfarininpatientswithatrialfibrillationandendoscopydiagnosedpepticulcer