Cargando…
Safety and Effectiveness of Direct Oral Anticoagulants vs. Warfarin in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Endoscopy-Diagnosed Peptic Ulcer
Background: Patients with active peptic ulcer (PU) were excluded from direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) trials for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). This study evaluated the safety and effectiveness of DOACs in AF patients with active, inactive and no peptic ulcer (PU). Met...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8732988/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35004890 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2021.774072 |
_version_ | 1784627720428191744 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Chun-Li Huang, Chien-Hao Wu, Victor Chien-Chia Huang, Ya-Chi Wang, Hsiang-Sheng Kuo, Chang-Fu Chu, Pao-Hsien Wen, Ming-Shien Chen, Ying-Jen Huang, Yu-Tung Chang, Shang-Hung |
author_facet | Wang, Chun-Li Huang, Chien-Hao Wu, Victor Chien-Chia Huang, Ya-Chi Wang, Hsiang-Sheng Kuo, Chang-Fu Chu, Pao-Hsien Wen, Ming-Shien Chen, Ying-Jen Huang, Yu-Tung Chang, Shang-Hung |
author_sort | Wang, Chun-Li |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Patients with active peptic ulcer (PU) were excluded from direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) trials for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). This study evaluated the safety and effectiveness of DOACs in AF patients with active, inactive and no peptic ulcer (PU). Methods: This study accessed electronic medical records from January 1, 2009 to May 31, 2019 at a multi-center healthcare provider in Taiwan and involved 2,955 AF patients who had undergone esophagogastroduodenoscopy ≤ 1 year before anticoagulation. Subjects were classified into 3 groups: active (n = 237), inactive (n = 828) and no-PU (n = 1,890) groups. We compared the risks of major bleeding, gastrointestinal bleeding, and ischemic stroke/systemic embolism (IS/SE) between DOACs and warfarin among the 3 groups. Results: In the active PU group, there were no significant differences in the risks of major bleeding [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.65, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.08–4.98, p = 0.676], gastrointestinal bleeding (HR = 0.65, 95% CI 0.08–4.98, p = 0.676) and IS/SE (HR = 2.58; 95% CI 0.53–12.70, p = 0.243) between DOAC and warfarin (as the reference). In the inactive PU group, there were no significant differences in the risks of major bleeding (HR = 0.36, 95% CI 0.09–1.39, p = 0.138), gastrointestinal bleeding (HR = 0.21, 95% CI 0.02–1.80, p = 0.153), and IS/SE (HR = 1.04, 95% CI 0.39–2.82, p = 0.934) between DOAC and warfarin (as the reference). In the no-PU group, DOACs were associated with lower risk of major bleeding (HR = 0.26, 95% CI 0.12–0.53, p < 0.001), gastrointestinal bleeding (HR = 0.25, 95% CI 0.01–0.59, p = 0.002), and similar risk of IS/SE (HR = 0.92, 95% CI 0.55–1.54, p = 0.757) compared to warfarin. Conclusions: DOACs were as effective as warfarin in preventing IS/SE irrespective of PU status and safer than warfarin in reducing major bleeding in the no-PU group. In patients with active or inactive PUs, DOAC and warfarin were not significantly different in their effects on major bleeding or gastrointestinal bleeding. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8732988 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87329882022-01-07 Safety and Effectiveness of Direct Oral Anticoagulants vs. Warfarin in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Endoscopy-Diagnosed Peptic Ulcer Wang, Chun-Li Huang, Chien-Hao Wu, Victor Chien-Chia Huang, Ya-Chi Wang, Hsiang-Sheng Kuo, Chang-Fu Chu, Pao-Hsien Wen, Ming-Shien Chen, Ying-Jen Huang, Yu-Tung Chang, Shang-Hung Front Cardiovasc Med Cardiovascular Medicine Background: Patients with active peptic ulcer (PU) were excluded from direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) trials for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). This study evaluated the safety and effectiveness of DOACs in AF patients with active, inactive and no peptic ulcer (PU). Methods: This study accessed electronic medical records from January 1, 2009 to May 31, 2019 at a multi-center healthcare provider in Taiwan and involved 2,955 AF patients who had undergone esophagogastroduodenoscopy ≤ 1 year before anticoagulation. Subjects were classified into 3 groups: active (n = 237), inactive (n = 828) and no-PU (n = 1,890) groups. We compared the risks of major bleeding, gastrointestinal bleeding, and ischemic stroke/systemic embolism (IS/SE) between DOACs and warfarin among the 3 groups. Results: In the active PU group, there were no significant differences in the risks of major bleeding [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.65, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.08–4.98, p = 0.676], gastrointestinal bleeding (HR = 0.65, 95% CI 0.08–4.98, p = 0.676) and IS/SE (HR = 2.58; 95% CI 0.53–12.70, p = 0.243) between DOAC and warfarin (as the reference). In the inactive PU group, there were no significant differences in the risks of major bleeding (HR = 0.36, 95% CI 0.09–1.39, p = 0.138), gastrointestinal bleeding (HR = 0.21, 95% CI 0.02–1.80, p = 0.153), and IS/SE (HR = 1.04, 95% CI 0.39–2.82, p = 0.934) between DOAC and warfarin (as the reference). In the no-PU group, DOACs were associated with lower risk of major bleeding (HR = 0.26, 95% CI 0.12–0.53, p < 0.001), gastrointestinal bleeding (HR = 0.25, 95% CI 0.01–0.59, p = 0.002), and similar risk of IS/SE (HR = 0.92, 95% CI 0.55–1.54, p = 0.757) compared to warfarin. Conclusions: DOACs were as effective as warfarin in preventing IS/SE irrespective of PU status and safer than warfarin in reducing major bleeding in the no-PU group. In patients with active or inactive PUs, DOAC and warfarin were not significantly different in their effects on major bleeding or gastrointestinal bleeding. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8732988/ /pubmed/35004890 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2021.774072 Text en Copyright © 2021 Wang, Huang, Wu, Huang, Wang, Kuo, Chu, Wen, Chen, Huang and Chang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Cardiovascular Medicine Wang, Chun-Li Huang, Chien-Hao Wu, Victor Chien-Chia Huang, Ya-Chi Wang, Hsiang-Sheng Kuo, Chang-Fu Chu, Pao-Hsien Wen, Ming-Shien Chen, Ying-Jen Huang, Yu-Tung Chang, Shang-Hung Safety and Effectiveness of Direct Oral Anticoagulants vs. Warfarin in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Endoscopy-Diagnosed Peptic Ulcer |
title | Safety and Effectiveness of Direct Oral Anticoagulants vs. Warfarin in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Endoscopy-Diagnosed Peptic Ulcer |
title_full | Safety and Effectiveness of Direct Oral Anticoagulants vs. Warfarin in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Endoscopy-Diagnosed Peptic Ulcer |
title_fullStr | Safety and Effectiveness of Direct Oral Anticoagulants vs. Warfarin in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Endoscopy-Diagnosed Peptic Ulcer |
title_full_unstemmed | Safety and Effectiveness of Direct Oral Anticoagulants vs. Warfarin in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Endoscopy-Diagnosed Peptic Ulcer |
title_short | Safety and Effectiveness of Direct Oral Anticoagulants vs. Warfarin in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Endoscopy-Diagnosed Peptic Ulcer |
title_sort | safety and effectiveness of direct oral anticoagulants vs. warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation and endoscopy-diagnosed peptic ulcer |
topic | Cardiovascular Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8732988/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35004890 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2021.774072 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangchunli safetyandeffectivenessofdirectoralanticoagulantsvswarfarininpatientswithatrialfibrillationandendoscopydiagnosedpepticulcer AT huangchienhao safetyandeffectivenessofdirectoralanticoagulantsvswarfarininpatientswithatrialfibrillationandendoscopydiagnosedpepticulcer AT wuvictorchienchia safetyandeffectivenessofdirectoralanticoagulantsvswarfarininpatientswithatrialfibrillationandendoscopydiagnosedpepticulcer AT huangyachi safetyandeffectivenessofdirectoralanticoagulantsvswarfarininpatientswithatrialfibrillationandendoscopydiagnosedpepticulcer AT wanghsiangsheng safetyandeffectivenessofdirectoralanticoagulantsvswarfarininpatientswithatrialfibrillationandendoscopydiagnosedpepticulcer AT kuochangfu safetyandeffectivenessofdirectoralanticoagulantsvswarfarininpatientswithatrialfibrillationandendoscopydiagnosedpepticulcer AT chupaohsien safetyandeffectivenessofdirectoralanticoagulantsvswarfarininpatientswithatrialfibrillationandendoscopydiagnosedpepticulcer AT wenmingshien safetyandeffectivenessofdirectoralanticoagulantsvswarfarininpatientswithatrialfibrillationandendoscopydiagnosedpepticulcer AT chenyingjen safetyandeffectivenessofdirectoralanticoagulantsvswarfarininpatientswithatrialfibrillationandendoscopydiagnosedpepticulcer AT huangyutung safetyandeffectivenessofdirectoralanticoagulantsvswarfarininpatientswithatrialfibrillationandendoscopydiagnosedpepticulcer AT changshanghung safetyandeffectivenessofdirectoralanticoagulantsvswarfarininpatientswithatrialfibrillationandendoscopydiagnosedpepticulcer |