Cargando…

The Biomechanical Consequences of Arthroscopic Hip Capsulotomy and Repair in Positions at Risk for Dislocation

BACKGROUND: The effect of interportal (IP) capsulotomy, short T-capsulotomy, and long T-capsulotomy, and their repairs, on resistance to anterior and posterior “at risk for dislocation” positions has not been quantified. HYPOTHESES: Our primary hypothesis was that an IP capsulotomy would have a mini...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wach, Amanda, Mlynarek, Ryan, Maher, Suzanne A., Kelly, Bryan T., Ranawat, Anil
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8733365/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35005047
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671211061609
_version_ 1784627788616040448
author Wach, Amanda
Mlynarek, Ryan
Maher, Suzanne A.
Kelly, Bryan T.
Ranawat, Anil
author_facet Wach, Amanda
Mlynarek, Ryan
Maher, Suzanne A.
Kelly, Bryan T.
Ranawat, Anil
author_sort Wach, Amanda
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The effect of interportal (IP) capsulotomy, short T-capsulotomy, and long T-capsulotomy, and their repairs, on resistance to anterior and posterior “at risk for dislocation” positions has not been quantified. HYPOTHESES: Our primary hypothesis was that an IP capsulotomy would have a minimal effect on hip resistive torque compared with both short and long T-capsulotomies in the at-risk dislocation positions. Our secondary hypothesis was that capsule repair would significantly increase hip resistive torque for all capsulotomies. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: We mounted 10 cadaveric hips on a biaxial test frame in an anterior dislocation high-risk position (20° of hip extension and external rotation) and posterior dislocation high-risk position (90° of hip flexion and internal rotation). An axial force of 100 N was applied to the intact hip while the femur was internally or externally rotated at 15° per second to a torque of 5 N·m. The rotatory position at 5 N·m was recorded and set as a target for each subsequent condition. Hips were then sequentially tested with IP, short T-, and long T-capsulotomies and with corresponding repairs randomized within each condition. Peak resistive torques were compared using generalized estimating equation modeling and post hoc Bonferroni-adjusted tests. RESULTS: For the anterior position, the IP and long T-capsulotomies demonstrated significantly lower resistive torques compared with intact. For the posterior position, both the short and long T-capsulotomies resulted in significantly lower resistive torques compared with intact. Repairs for all 3 capsulotomy types were not significantly different from the intact condition at anterior and posterior positions. CONCLUSION: An IP incision resulted in a decrease in capsular resistive torque in the anterior but not the posterior at-risk dislocation position, in which direction only T-capsulotomies led to a significant decrease. All capsulotomy repair conditions resulted in hip resistive torques that were similar to the intact hip in both dislocation positions. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Our results suggest that it is biomechanically advantageous to repair IP, short T-, and long T-capsulotomies, particularly for at-risk anterior dislocation positions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8733365
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87333652022-01-07 The Biomechanical Consequences of Arthroscopic Hip Capsulotomy and Repair in Positions at Risk for Dislocation Wach, Amanda Mlynarek, Ryan Maher, Suzanne A. Kelly, Bryan T. Ranawat, Anil Orthop J Sports Med Article BACKGROUND: The effect of interportal (IP) capsulotomy, short T-capsulotomy, and long T-capsulotomy, and their repairs, on resistance to anterior and posterior “at risk for dislocation” positions has not been quantified. HYPOTHESES: Our primary hypothesis was that an IP capsulotomy would have a minimal effect on hip resistive torque compared with both short and long T-capsulotomies in the at-risk dislocation positions. Our secondary hypothesis was that capsule repair would significantly increase hip resistive torque for all capsulotomies. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: We mounted 10 cadaveric hips on a biaxial test frame in an anterior dislocation high-risk position (20° of hip extension and external rotation) and posterior dislocation high-risk position (90° of hip flexion and internal rotation). An axial force of 100 N was applied to the intact hip while the femur was internally or externally rotated at 15° per second to a torque of 5 N·m. The rotatory position at 5 N·m was recorded and set as a target for each subsequent condition. Hips were then sequentially tested with IP, short T-, and long T-capsulotomies and with corresponding repairs randomized within each condition. Peak resistive torques were compared using generalized estimating equation modeling and post hoc Bonferroni-adjusted tests. RESULTS: For the anterior position, the IP and long T-capsulotomies demonstrated significantly lower resistive torques compared with intact. For the posterior position, both the short and long T-capsulotomies resulted in significantly lower resistive torques compared with intact. Repairs for all 3 capsulotomy types were not significantly different from the intact condition at anterior and posterior positions. CONCLUSION: An IP incision resulted in a decrease in capsular resistive torque in the anterior but not the posterior at-risk dislocation position, in which direction only T-capsulotomies led to a significant decrease. All capsulotomy repair conditions resulted in hip resistive torques that were similar to the intact hip in both dislocation positions. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Our results suggest that it is biomechanically advantageous to repair IP, short T-, and long T-capsulotomies, particularly for at-risk anterior dislocation positions. SAGE Publications 2022-01-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8733365/ /pubmed/35005047 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671211061609 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Article
Wach, Amanda
Mlynarek, Ryan
Maher, Suzanne A.
Kelly, Bryan T.
Ranawat, Anil
The Biomechanical Consequences of Arthroscopic Hip Capsulotomy and Repair in Positions at Risk for Dislocation
title The Biomechanical Consequences of Arthroscopic Hip Capsulotomy and Repair in Positions at Risk for Dislocation
title_full The Biomechanical Consequences of Arthroscopic Hip Capsulotomy and Repair in Positions at Risk for Dislocation
title_fullStr The Biomechanical Consequences of Arthroscopic Hip Capsulotomy and Repair in Positions at Risk for Dislocation
title_full_unstemmed The Biomechanical Consequences of Arthroscopic Hip Capsulotomy and Repair in Positions at Risk for Dislocation
title_short The Biomechanical Consequences of Arthroscopic Hip Capsulotomy and Repair in Positions at Risk for Dislocation
title_sort biomechanical consequences of arthroscopic hip capsulotomy and repair in positions at risk for dislocation
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8733365/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35005047
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671211061609
work_keys_str_mv AT wachamanda thebiomechanicalconsequencesofarthroscopichipcapsulotomyandrepairinpositionsatriskfordislocation
AT mlynarekryan thebiomechanicalconsequencesofarthroscopichipcapsulotomyandrepairinpositionsatriskfordislocation
AT mahersuzannea thebiomechanicalconsequencesofarthroscopichipcapsulotomyandrepairinpositionsatriskfordislocation
AT kellybryant thebiomechanicalconsequencesofarthroscopichipcapsulotomyandrepairinpositionsatriskfordislocation
AT ranawatanil thebiomechanicalconsequencesofarthroscopichipcapsulotomyandrepairinpositionsatriskfordislocation
AT wachamanda biomechanicalconsequencesofarthroscopichipcapsulotomyandrepairinpositionsatriskfordislocation
AT mlynarekryan biomechanicalconsequencesofarthroscopichipcapsulotomyandrepairinpositionsatriskfordislocation
AT mahersuzannea biomechanicalconsequencesofarthroscopichipcapsulotomyandrepairinpositionsatriskfordislocation
AT kellybryant biomechanicalconsequencesofarthroscopichipcapsulotomyandrepairinpositionsatriskfordislocation
AT ranawatanil biomechanicalconsequencesofarthroscopichipcapsulotomyandrepairinpositionsatriskfordislocation