Cargando…

Determining the Minimal Clinically Important Difference on the Oxford Shoulder Instability Score in Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Bankart Repair for Shoulder Instability

BACKGROUND: The literature on minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) for patient-reported outcome measures assessing shoulder instability is limited, with none addressing the Oxford Shoulder Instability Score (OSIS). The OSIS was developed to provide a standardized method for assessing sho...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Foong, Wei Sheng, Zeng, Gerald Joseph, Goh, Graham S., Hao, Ying, Lie, Denny Tjiauw Tjoen, Chang, Paul Chee Cheng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8733367/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35005046
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671211060023
_version_ 1784627789083705344
author Foong, Wei Sheng
Zeng, Gerald Joseph
Goh, Graham S.
Hao, Ying
Lie, Denny Tjiauw Tjoen
Chang, Paul Chee Cheng
author_facet Foong, Wei Sheng
Zeng, Gerald Joseph
Goh, Graham S.
Hao, Ying
Lie, Denny Tjiauw Tjoen
Chang, Paul Chee Cheng
author_sort Foong, Wei Sheng
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The literature on minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) for patient-reported outcome measures assessing shoulder instability is limited, with none addressing the Oxford Shoulder Instability Score (OSIS). The OSIS was developed to provide a standardized method for assessing shoulder function after surgery for shoulder instability, and previous studies have demonstrated its high reliability, low interrater variability, and ease of administration. PURPOSE: To identify the MCID for the OSIS after arthroscopic Bankart repair for recurrent shoulder instability. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: A longitudinally maintained institutional registry was queried for patients who underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair from 2010 to 2016 for recurrent shoulder instability secondary to a Bankart lesion without significant glenoid bone loss. The OSIS was completed preoperatively and at 1 year postoperatively. Patients were categorized into “expectations met” and “expectations unmet” groups using a questionnaire evaluating expectation fulfilment. The MCID of the OSIS at 1 year was calculated using 3 anchor-based approaches and a distribution-based approach. The 3 anchor-based approaches comprised (1) simple linear regression analysis, (2) receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, and (3) calculation of mean differences in change for the OSIS between the “expectations met” and “expectations unmet” groups. RESULTS: The study cohort comprised 68 men and 11 women aged 29.9 ± 12.7 years (mean ± SD). Duration of follow-up for all patients exceeded 1 year. The MCIDs for the OSIS based on the 4 calculation approaches yielded a narrow range of values, ranging from 7.7 to 8.5 for the anchor-based methods and 8.6 for the distribution-based method. CONCLUSION: Study results indicated that patients with recurrent shoulder instability without significant bone loss who undergo primary arthroscopic Bankart repair and have at least 8.6 points of improvement on their OSIS experience a clinically significant change at 1 year postoperatively.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8733367
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87333672022-01-07 Determining the Minimal Clinically Important Difference on the Oxford Shoulder Instability Score in Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Bankart Repair for Shoulder Instability Foong, Wei Sheng Zeng, Gerald Joseph Goh, Graham S. Hao, Ying Lie, Denny Tjiauw Tjoen Chang, Paul Chee Cheng Orthop J Sports Med Article BACKGROUND: The literature on minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) for patient-reported outcome measures assessing shoulder instability is limited, with none addressing the Oxford Shoulder Instability Score (OSIS). The OSIS was developed to provide a standardized method for assessing shoulder function after surgery for shoulder instability, and previous studies have demonstrated its high reliability, low interrater variability, and ease of administration. PURPOSE: To identify the MCID for the OSIS after arthroscopic Bankart repair for recurrent shoulder instability. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: A longitudinally maintained institutional registry was queried for patients who underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair from 2010 to 2016 for recurrent shoulder instability secondary to a Bankart lesion without significant glenoid bone loss. The OSIS was completed preoperatively and at 1 year postoperatively. Patients were categorized into “expectations met” and “expectations unmet” groups using a questionnaire evaluating expectation fulfilment. The MCID of the OSIS at 1 year was calculated using 3 anchor-based approaches and a distribution-based approach. The 3 anchor-based approaches comprised (1) simple linear regression analysis, (2) receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, and (3) calculation of mean differences in change for the OSIS between the “expectations met” and “expectations unmet” groups. RESULTS: The study cohort comprised 68 men and 11 women aged 29.9 ± 12.7 years (mean ± SD). Duration of follow-up for all patients exceeded 1 year. The MCIDs for the OSIS based on the 4 calculation approaches yielded a narrow range of values, ranging from 7.7 to 8.5 for the anchor-based methods and 8.6 for the distribution-based method. CONCLUSION: Study results indicated that patients with recurrent shoulder instability without significant bone loss who undergo primary arthroscopic Bankart repair and have at least 8.6 points of improvement on their OSIS experience a clinically significant change at 1 year postoperatively. SAGE Publications 2022-01-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8733367/ /pubmed/35005046 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671211060023 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Article
Foong, Wei Sheng
Zeng, Gerald Joseph
Goh, Graham S.
Hao, Ying
Lie, Denny Tjiauw Tjoen
Chang, Paul Chee Cheng
Determining the Minimal Clinically Important Difference on the Oxford Shoulder Instability Score in Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Bankart Repair for Shoulder Instability
title Determining the Minimal Clinically Important Difference on the Oxford Shoulder Instability Score in Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Bankart Repair for Shoulder Instability
title_full Determining the Minimal Clinically Important Difference on the Oxford Shoulder Instability Score in Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Bankart Repair for Shoulder Instability
title_fullStr Determining the Minimal Clinically Important Difference on the Oxford Shoulder Instability Score in Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Bankart Repair for Shoulder Instability
title_full_unstemmed Determining the Minimal Clinically Important Difference on the Oxford Shoulder Instability Score in Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Bankart Repair for Shoulder Instability
title_short Determining the Minimal Clinically Important Difference on the Oxford Shoulder Instability Score in Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Bankart Repair for Shoulder Instability
title_sort determining the minimal clinically important difference on the oxford shoulder instability score in patients undergoing arthroscopic bankart repair for shoulder instability
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8733367/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35005046
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671211060023
work_keys_str_mv AT foongweisheng determiningtheminimalclinicallyimportantdifferenceontheoxfordshoulderinstabilityscoreinpatientsundergoingarthroscopicbankartrepairforshoulderinstability
AT zenggeraldjoseph determiningtheminimalclinicallyimportantdifferenceontheoxfordshoulderinstabilityscoreinpatientsundergoingarthroscopicbankartrepairforshoulderinstability
AT gohgrahams determiningtheminimalclinicallyimportantdifferenceontheoxfordshoulderinstabilityscoreinpatientsundergoingarthroscopicbankartrepairforshoulderinstability
AT haoying determiningtheminimalclinicallyimportantdifferenceontheoxfordshoulderinstabilityscoreinpatientsundergoingarthroscopicbankartrepairforshoulderinstability
AT liedennytjiauwtjoen determiningtheminimalclinicallyimportantdifferenceontheoxfordshoulderinstabilityscoreinpatientsundergoingarthroscopicbankartrepairforshoulderinstability
AT changpaulcheecheng determiningtheminimalclinicallyimportantdifferenceontheoxfordshoulderinstabilityscoreinpatientsundergoingarthroscopicbankartrepairforshoulderinstability