Cargando…
Determining the Minimal Clinically Important Difference on the Oxford Shoulder Instability Score in Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Bankart Repair for Shoulder Instability
BACKGROUND: The literature on minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) for patient-reported outcome measures assessing shoulder instability is limited, with none addressing the Oxford Shoulder Instability Score (OSIS). The OSIS was developed to provide a standardized method for assessing sho...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8733367/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35005046 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671211060023 |
_version_ | 1784627789083705344 |
---|---|
author | Foong, Wei Sheng Zeng, Gerald Joseph Goh, Graham S. Hao, Ying Lie, Denny Tjiauw Tjoen Chang, Paul Chee Cheng |
author_facet | Foong, Wei Sheng Zeng, Gerald Joseph Goh, Graham S. Hao, Ying Lie, Denny Tjiauw Tjoen Chang, Paul Chee Cheng |
author_sort | Foong, Wei Sheng |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The literature on minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) for patient-reported outcome measures assessing shoulder instability is limited, with none addressing the Oxford Shoulder Instability Score (OSIS). The OSIS was developed to provide a standardized method for assessing shoulder function after surgery for shoulder instability, and previous studies have demonstrated its high reliability, low interrater variability, and ease of administration. PURPOSE: To identify the MCID for the OSIS after arthroscopic Bankart repair for recurrent shoulder instability. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: A longitudinally maintained institutional registry was queried for patients who underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair from 2010 to 2016 for recurrent shoulder instability secondary to a Bankart lesion without significant glenoid bone loss. The OSIS was completed preoperatively and at 1 year postoperatively. Patients were categorized into “expectations met” and “expectations unmet” groups using a questionnaire evaluating expectation fulfilment. The MCID of the OSIS at 1 year was calculated using 3 anchor-based approaches and a distribution-based approach. The 3 anchor-based approaches comprised (1) simple linear regression analysis, (2) receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, and (3) calculation of mean differences in change for the OSIS between the “expectations met” and “expectations unmet” groups. RESULTS: The study cohort comprised 68 men and 11 women aged 29.9 ± 12.7 years (mean ± SD). Duration of follow-up for all patients exceeded 1 year. The MCIDs for the OSIS based on the 4 calculation approaches yielded a narrow range of values, ranging from 7.7 to 8.5 for the anchor-based methods and 8.6 for the distribution-based method. CONCLUSION: Study results indicated that patients with recurrent shoulder instability without significant bone loss who undergo primary arthroscopic Bankart repair and have at least 8.6 points of improvement on their OSIS experience a clinically significant change at 1 year postoperatively. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8733367 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87333672022-01-07 Determining the Minimal Clinically Important Difference on the Oxford Shoulder Instability Score in Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Bankart Repair for Shoulder Instability Foong, Wei Sheng Zeng, Gerald Joseph Goh, Graham S. Hao, Ying Lie, Denny Tjiauw Tjoen Chang, Paul Chee Cheng Orthop J Sports Med Article BACKGROUND: The literature on minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) for patient-reported outcome measures assessing shoulder instability is limited, with none addressing the Oxford Shoulder Instability Score (OSIS). The OSIS was developed to provide a standardized method for assessing shoulder function after surgery for shoulder instability, and previous studies have demonstrated its high reliability, low interrater variability, and ease of administration. PURPOSE: To identify the MCID for the OSIS after arthroscopic Bankart repair for recurrent shoulder instability. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: A longitudinally maintained institutional registry was queried for patients who underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair from 2010 to 2016 for recurrent shoulder instability secondary to a Bankart lesion without significant glenoid bone loss. The OSIS was completed preoperatively and at 1 year postoperatively. Patients were categorized into “expectations met” and “expectations unmet” groups using a questionnaire evaluating expectation fulfilment. The MCID of the OSIS at 1 year was calculated using 3 anchor-based approaches and a distribution-based approach. The 3 anchor-based approaches comprised (1) simple linear regression analysis, (2) receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, and (3) calculation of mean differences in change for the OSIS between the “expectations met” and “expectations unmet” groups. RESULTS: The study cohort comprised 68 men and 11 women aged 29.9 ± 12.7 years (mean ± SD). Duration of follow-up for all patients exceeded 1 year. The MCIDs for the OSIS based on the 4 calculation approaches yielded a narrow range of values, ranging from 7.7 to 8.5 for the anchor-based methods and 8.6 for the distribution-based method. CONCLUSION: Study results indicated that patients with recurrent shoulder instability without significant bone loss who undergo primary arthroscopic Bankart repair and have at least 8.6 points of improvement on their OSIS experience a clinically significant change at 1 year postoperatively. SAGE Publications 2022-01-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8733367/ /pubmed/35005046 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671211060023 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Article Foong, Wei Sheng Zeng, Gerald Joseph Goh, Graham S. Hao, Ying Lie, Denny Tjiauw Tjoen Chang, Paul Chee Cheng Determining the Minimal Clinically Important Difference on the Oxford Shoulder Instability Score in Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Bankart Repair for Shoulder Instability |
title | Determining the Minimal Clinically Important Difference on the Oxford Shoulder Instability Score in Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Bankart Repair for Shoulder Instability |
title_full | Determining the Minimal Clinically Important Difference on the Oxford Shoulder Instability Score in Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Bankart Repair for Shoulder Instability |
title_fullStr | Determining the Minimal Clinically Important Difference on the Oxford Shoulder Instability Score in Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Bankart Repair for Shoulder Instability |
title_full_unstemmed | Determining the Minimal Clinically Important Difference on the Oxford Shoulder Instability Score in Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Bankart Repair for Shoulder Instability |
title_short | Determining the Minimal Clinically Important Difference on the Oxford Shoulder Instability Score in Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Bankart Repair for Shoulder Instability |
title_sort | determining the minimal clinically important difference on the oxford shoulder instability score in patients undergoing arthroscopic bankart repair for shoulder instability |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8733367/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35005046 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671211060023 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT foongweisheng determiningtheminimalclinicallyimportantdifferenceontheoxfordshoulderinstabilityscoreinpatientsundergoingarthroscopicbankartrepairforshoulderinstability AT zenggeraldjoseph determiningtheminimalclinicallyimportantdifferenceontheoxfordshoulderinstabilityscoreinpatientsundergoingarthroscopicbankartrepairforshoulderinstability AT gohgrahams determiningtheminimalclinicallyimportantdifferenceontheoxfordshoulderinstabilityscoreinpatientsundergoingarthroscopicbankartrepairforshoulderinstability AT haoying determiningtheminimalclinicallyimportantdifferenceontheoxfordshoulderinstabilityscoreinpatientsundergoingarthroscopicbankartrepairforshoulderinstability AT liedennytjiauwtjoen determiningtheminimalclinicallyimportantdifferenceontheoxfordshoulderinstabilityscoreinpatientsundergoingarthroscopicbankartrepairforshoulderinstability AT changpaulcheecheng determiningtheminimalclinicallyimportantdifferenceontheoxfordshoulderinstabilityscoreinpatientsundergoingarthroscopicbankartrepairforshoulderinstability |