Cargando…
Determining the Minimal Clinically Important Difference on the Oxford Shoulder Instability Score in Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Bankart Repair for Shoulder Instability
BACKGROUND: The literature on minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) for patient-reported outcome measures assessing shoulder instability is limited, with none addressing the Oxford Shoulder Instability Score (OSIS). The OSIS was developed to provide a standardized method for assessing sho...
Autores principales: | Foong, Wei Sheng, Zeng, Gerald Joseph, Goh, Graham S., Hao, Ying, Lie, Denny Tjiauw Tjoen, Chang, Paul Chee Cheng |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8733367/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35005046 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671211060023 |
Ejemplares similares
-
The UCLA Shoulder Score Is a Better Predictor of Treatment Success Than the Constant and Oxford Shoulder Scores After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A 2-Year Follow-Up Study
por: Moorthy, Vikaesh, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Long term results of arthroscopic bankart repair for traumatic anterior shoulder instability
por: Ee, Gerard WW, et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
Functional outcome after open and arthroscopic Bankart repair for traumatic shoulder instability
por: Lützner, J, et al.
Publicado: (2009) -
Comparison of Bristow procedure and Bankart arthroscopic method as the treatment of recurrent shoulder instability
por: Zarezade, Abolghasem, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Arthroscopic Bankart Repair Versus Open Latarjet for Recurrent Shoulder Instability in Athletes
por: Hurley, Eoghan T., et al.
Publicado: (2021)