Cargando…
Preliminary Report of Validity for the Infant Comprehensive Evaluation for Neurodevelopmental Delay, a Newly Developed Inventory for Children Aged 12 to 71 Months
OBJECTIVES: Early detection of developmental issues in infants and necessary intervention are important. To identify the comorbid conditions, a comprehensive evaluation is required. The study’s objectives were to 1) generate scale items by identifying and eliciting concepts relevant to young childre...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Korean Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8733413/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35035238 http://dx.doi.org/10.5765/jkacap.210033 |
_version_ | 1784627800196513792 |
---|---|
author | Hong, Minha Lee, Kyung-Sook Park, Jin-Ah Kang, Ji-Yeon Shin, Yong Woo Cho, Young Il Moon, Duk-Soo Cho, Seongwoo Hwangbo, Ram Lee, Seung Yup Bahn, Geon Ho |
author_facet | Hong, Minha Lee, Kyung-Sook Park, Jin-Ah Kang, Ji-Yeon Shin, Yong Woo Cho, Young Il Moon, Duk-Soo Cho, Seongwoo Hwangbo, Ram Lee, Seung Yup Bahn, Geon Ho |
author_sort | Hong, Minha |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Early detection of developmental issues in infants and necessary intervention are important. To identify the comorbid conditions, a comprehensive evaluation is required. The study’s objectives were to 1) generate scale items by identifying and eliciting concepts relevant to young children (12–71 months) with developmental delays, 2) develop a comprehensive screening tool for developmental delay and comorbid conditions, and 3) assess the tool’s validity and cut-off. METHODS: Multidisciplinary experts devised the “Infant Comprehensive Evaluation for Neurodevelopmental Delay (ICEND),” an assessment method that comes in two versions depending on the age of the child: 12–36 months and 37–71 months, through monthly seminars and focused group interviews. The ICEND is composed of three parts: risk factors, resilience factors, and clinical scales. In parts 1 and 2, there were 41 caretakers responded to the questionnaires. Part 3 involved clinicians evaluating ten subscales using 98 and 114 questionnaires for younger and older versions, respectively. The Child Behavior Checklist, Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire, Infant- Toddler Social Emotional Assessment, and Korean Developmental Screening Test for Infants and Children were employed to analyze concurrent validity with the ICEND. The analyses were performed on both typical and high-risk infants to identify concurrent validity, reliability, and cut-off scores. RESULTS: A total of 296 people participated in the study, with 57 of them being high-risk (19.2%). The Cronbach’s alpha was positive (0.533–0.928). In the majority of domains, the ICEND demonstrated a fair discriminatory ability, with a sensitivity of 0.5–0.7 and specificity 0.7–0.9. CONCLUSION: The ICEND is reliable and valid, indicating its potential as an auxiliary tool for assessing neurodevelopmental delay and comorbid conditions in children aged 12–36 months and 37–71 months. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8733413 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Korean Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87334132022-01-14 Preliminary Report of Validity for the Infant Comprehensive Evaluation for Neurodevelopmental Delay, a Newly Developed Inventory for Children Aged 12 to 71 Months Hong, Minha Lee, Kyung-Sook Park, Jin-Ah Kang, Ji-Yeon Shin, Yong Woo Cho, Young Il Moon, Duk-Soo Cho, Seongwoo Hwangbo, Ram Lee, Seung Yup Bahn, Geon Ho Soa Chongsonyon Chongsin Uihak Original Article OBJECTIVES: Early detection of developmental issues in infants and necessary intervention are important. To identify the comorbid conditions, a comprehensive evaluation is required. The study’s objectives were to 1) generate scale items by identifying and eliciting concepts relevant to young children (12–71 months) with developmental delays, 2) develop a comprehensive screening tool for developmental delay and comorbid conditions, and 3) assess the tool’s validity and cut-off. METHODS: Multidisciplinary experts devised the “Infant Comprehensive Evaluation for Neurodevelopmental Delay (ICEND),” an assessment method that comes in two versions depending on the age of the child: 12–36 months and 37–71 months, through monthly seminars and focused group interviews. The ICEND is composed of three parts: risk factors, resilience factors, and clinical scales. In parts 1 and 2, there were 41 caretakers responded to the questionnaires. Part 3 involved clinicians evaluating ten subscales using 98 and 114 questionnaires for younger and older versions, respectively. The Child Behavior Checklist, Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire, Infant- Toddler Social Emotional Assessment, and Korean Developmental Screening Test for Infants and Children were employed to analyze concurrent validity with the ICEND. The analyses were performed on both typical and high-risk infants to identify concurrent validity, reliability, and cut-off scores. RESULTS: A total of 296 people participated in the study, with 57 of them being high-risk (19.2%). The Cronbach’s alpha was positive (0.533–0.928). In the majority of domains, the ICEND demonstrated a fair discriminatory ability, with a sensitivity of 0.5–0.7 and specificity 0.7–0.9. CONCLUSION: The ICEND is reliable and valid, indicating its potential as an auxiliary tool for assessing neurodevelopmental delay and comorbid conditions in children aged 12–36 months and 37–71 months. Korean Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 2022-01-01 2022-01-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8733413/ /pubmed/35035238 http://dx.doi.org/10.5765/jkacap.210033 Text en Copyright © 2022 Korean Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Hong, Minha Lee, Kyung-Sook Park, Jin-Ah Kang, Ji-Yeon Shin, Yong Woo Cho, Young Il Moon, Duk-Soo Cho, Seongwoo Hwangbo, Ram Lee, Seung Yup Bahn, Geon Ho Preliminary Report of Validity for the Infant Comprehensive Evaluation for Neurodevelopmental Delay, a Newly Developed Inventory for Children Aged 12 to 71 Months |
title | Preliminary Report of Validity for the Infant Comprehensive Evaluation for Neurodevelopmental Delay, a Newly Developed Inventory for Children Aged 12 to 71 Months |
title_full | Preliminary Report of Validity for the Infant Comprehensive Evaluation for Neurodevelopmental Delay, a Newly Developed Inventory for Children Aged 12 to 71 Months |
title_fullStr | Preliminary Report of Validity for the Infant Comprehensive Evaluation for Neurodevelopmental Delay, a Newly Developed Inventory for Children Aged 12 to 71 Months |
title_full_unstemmed | Preliminary Report of Validity for the Infant Comprehensive Evaluation for Neurodevelopmental Delay, a Newly Developed Inventory for Children Aged 12 to 71 Months |
title_short | Preliminary Report of Validity for the Infant Comprehensive Evaluation for Neurodevelopmental Delay, a Newly Developed Inventory for Children Aged 12 to 71 Months |
title_sort | preliminary report of validity for the infant comprehensive evaluation for neurodevelopmental delay, a newly developed inventory for children aged 12 to 71 months |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8733413/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35035238 http://dx.doi.org/10.5765/jkacap.210033 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hongminha preliminaryreportofvalidityfortheinfantcomprehensiveevaluationforneurodevelopmentaldelayanewlydevelopedinventoryforchildrenaged12to71months AT leekyungsook preliminaryreportofvalidityfortheinfantcomprehensiveevaluationforneurodevelopmentaldelayanewlydevelopedinventoryforchildrenaged12to71months AT parkjinah preliminaryreportofvalidityfortheinfantcomprehensiveevaluationforneurodevelopmentaldelayanewlydevelopedinventoryforchildrenaged12to71months AT kangjiyeon preliminaryreportofvalidityfortheinfantcomprehensiveevaluationforneurodevelopmentaldelayanewlydevelopedinventoryforchildrenaged12to71months AT shinyongwoo preliminaryreportofvalidityfortheinfantcomprehensiveevaluationforneurodevelopmentaldelayanewlydevelopedinventoryforchildrenaged12to71months AT choyoungil preliminaryreportofvalidityfortheinfantcomprehensiveevaluationforneurodevelopmentaldelayanewlydevelopedinventoryforchildrenaged12to71months AT moonduksoo preliminaryreportofvalidityfortheinfantcomprehensiveevaluationforneurodevelopmentaldelayanewlydevelopedinventoryforchildrenaged12to71months AT choseongwoo preliminaryreportofvalidityfortheinfantcomprehensiveevaluationforneurodevelopmentaldelayanewlydevelopedinventoryforchildrenaged12to71months AT hwangboram preliminaryreportofvalidityfortheinfantcomprehensiveevaluationforneurodevelopmentaldelayanewlydevelopedinventoryforchildrenaged12to71months AT leeseungyup preliminaryreportofvalidityfortheinfantcomprehensiveevaluationforneurodevelopmentaldelayanewlydevelopedinventoryforchildrenaged12to71months AT bahngeonho preliminaryreportofvalidityfortheinfantcomprehensiveevaluationforneurodevelopmentaldelayanewlydevelopedinventoryforchildrenaged12to71months |