Cargando…
Assessment of the Field Utility of a Rapid Point-of-Care Test for SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies in a Household Cohort
Point-of-care (POC) tests to detect SARS-CoV-2 antibodies offer quick assessment of serostatus after natural infection or vaccination. We compared the field performance of the BioMedomics COVID-19 IgM/IgG Rapid Antibody Test against an ELISA in 303 participants enrolled in a SARS-CoV-2 household coh...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8733539/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34818625 http://dx.doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.21-0592 |
_version_ | 1784627819633967104 |
---|---|
author | Churiwal, Mehal Lin, Kelly D. Khan, Salman Chhetri, Srijana Muller, Meredith S. Tompkins, Kathleen Smith, Judy Litel, Christy Whittelsey, Maureen Basham, Christopher Rapp, Tyler Cerami, Carla Premkumar, Lakshmanane Lin, Jessica T. |
author_facet | Churiwal, Mehal Lin, Kelly D. Khan, Salman Chhetri, Srijana Muller, Meredith S. Tompkins, Kathleen Smith, Judy Litel, Christy Whittelsey, Maureen Basham, Christopher Rapp, Tyler Cerami, Carla Premkumar, Lakshmanane Lin, Jessica T. |
author_sort | Churiwal, Mehal |
collection | PubMed |
description | Point-of-care (POC) tests to detect SARS-CoV-2 antibodies offer quick assessment of serostatus after natural infection or vaccination. We compared the field performance of the BioMedomics COVID-19 IgM/IgG Rapid Antibody Test against an ELISA in 303 participants enrolled in a SARS-CoV-2 household cohort study. The rapid antibody test was easily implemented with consistent interpretation across 14 users in a variety of field settings. Compared with ELISA, detection of seroconversion lagged by 5 to 10 days. However, it retained a sensitivity of 90% (160/177, 95% confidence interval [CI] 85–94%) and specificity of 100% (43/43, 95% CI 92–100%) for those tested 3 to 5 weeks after symptom onset. Sensitivity was diminished among those with asymptomatic infection (74% [14/19], 95% CI 49–91%) and early in infection (45% [29/64], 95% CI 33–58%). When used appropriately, rapid antibody tests offer a convenient way to detect symptomatic infections during convalescence. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8733539 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87335392022-01-21 Assessment of the Field Utility of a Rapid Point-of-Care Test for SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies in a Household Cohort Churiwal, Mehal Lin, Kelly D. Khan, Salman Chhetri, Srijana Muller, Meredith S. Tompkins, Kathleen Smith, Judy Litel, Christy Whittelsey, Maureen Basham, Christopher Rapp, Tyler Cerami, Carla Premkumar, Lakshmanane Lin, Jessica T. Am J Trop Med Hyg Article Point-of-care (POC) tests to detect SARS-CoV-2 antibodies offer quick assessment of serostatus after natural infection or vaccination. We compared the field performance of the BioMedomics COVID-19 IgM/IgG Rapid Antibody Test against an ELISA in 303 participants enrolled in a SARS-CoV-2 household cohort study. The rapid antibody test was easily implemented with consistent interpretation across 14 users in a variety of field settings. Compared with ELISA, detection of seroconversion lagged by 5 to 10 days. However, it retained a sensitivity of 90% (160/177, 95% confidence interval [CI] 85–94%) and specificity of 100% (43/43, 95% CI 92–100%) for those tested 3 to 5 weeks after symptom onset. Sensitivity was diminished among those with asymptomatic infection (74% [14/19], 95% CI 49–91%) and early in infection (45% [29/64], 95% CI 33–58%). When used appropriately, rapid antibody tests offer a convenient way to detect symptomatic infections during convalescence. The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 2022-01 2021-11-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8733539/ /pubmed/34818625 http://dx.doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.21-0592 Text en © 2022 by The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Article Churiwal, Mehal Lin, Kelly D. Khan, Salman Chhetri, Srijana Muller, Meredith S. Tompkins, Kathleen Smith, Judy Litel, Christy Whittelsey, Maureen Basham, Christopher Rapp, Tyler Cerami, Carla Premkumar, Lakshmanane Lin, Jessica T. Assessment of the Field Utility of a Rapid Point-of-Care Test for SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies in a Household Cohort |
title | Assessment of the Field Utility of a Rapid Point-of-Care Test for SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies in a Household Cohort |
title_full | Assessment of the Field Utility of a Rapid Point-of-Care Test for SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies in a Household Cohort |
title_fullStr | Assessment of the Field Utility of a Rapid Point-of-Care Test for SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies in a Household Cohort |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessment of the Field Utility of a Rapid Point-of-Care Test for SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies in a Household Cohort |
title_short | Assessment of the Field Utility of a Rapid Point-of-Care Test for SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies in a Household Cohort |
title_sort | assessment of the field utility of a rapid point-of-care test for sars-cov-2 antibodies in a household cohort |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8733539/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34818625 http://dx.doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.21-0592 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT churiwalmehal assessmentofthefieldutilityofarapidpointofcaretestforsarscov2antibodiesinahouseholdcohort AT linkellyd assessmentofthefieldutilityofarapidpointofcaretestforsarscov2antibodiesinahouseholdcohort AT khansalman assessmentofthefieldutilityofarapidpointofcaretestforsarscov2antibodiesinahouseholdcohort AT chhetrisrijana assessmentofthefieldutilityofarapidpointofcaretestforsarscov2antibodiesinahouseholdcohort AT mullermerediths assessmentofthefieldutilityofarapidpointofcaretestforsarscov2antibodiesinahouseholdcohort AT tompkinskathleen assessmentofthefieldutilityofarapidpointofcaretestforsarscov2antibodiesinahouseholdcohort AT smithjudy assessmentofthefieldutilityofarapidpointofcaretestforsarscov2antibodiesinahouseholdcohort AT litelchristy assessmentofthefieldutilityofarapidpointofcaretestforsarscov2antibodiesinahouseholdcohort AT whittelseymaureen assessmentofthefieldutilityofarapidpointofcaretestforsarscov2antibodiesinahouseholdcohort AT bashamchristopher assessmentofthefieldutilityofarapidpointofcaretestforsarscov2antibodiesinahouseholdcohort AT rapptyler assessmentofthefieldutilityofarapidpointofcaretestforsarscov2antibodiesinahouseholdcohort AT ceramicarla assessmentofthefieldutilityofarapidpointofcaretestforsarscov2antibodiesinahouseholdcohort AT premkumarlakshmanane assessmentofthefieldutilityofarapidpointofcaretestforsarscov2antibodiesinahouseholdcohort AT linjessicat assessmentofthefieldutilityofarapidpointofcaretestforsarscov2antibodiesinahouseholdcohort |