Cargando…
Diagnostic Value of Radiomics Analysis in Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography for Identifying Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
PURPOSE: To evaluate the value of radiomics analysis in contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) for the identification of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). METHOD: CESM images of 367 pathologically confirmed breast cancer patients (training set: 218, testing set: 149) were retrospectively...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8733550/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35004294 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.773196 |
_version_ | 1784627820637454336 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Yongxia Liu, Fengjie Zhang, Han Ma, Heng Sun, Jian Zhang, Ran Song, Lei Shi, Hao |
author_facet | Zhang, Yongxia Liu, Fengjie Zhang, Han Ma, Heng Sun, Jian Zhang, Ran Song, Lei Shi, Hao |
author_sort | Zhang, Yongxia |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To evaluate the value of radiomics analysis in contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) for the identification of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). METHOD: CESM images of 367 pathologically confirmed breast cancer patients (training set: 218, testing set: 149) were retrospectively analyzed. Cranial caudal (CC), mediolateral oblique (MLO), and combined models were built on the basis of the features extracted from subtracted images on CC, MLO, and the combination of CC and MLO, respectively, in the tumour region. The performance of the models was evaluated through receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, the Hosmer-Lemeshow test, and decision curve analysis (DCA). The areas under ROC curves (AUCs) were compared through the DeLong test. RESULTS: The combined CC and MLO model had the best AUC and sensitivity of 0.90 (95% confidence interval: 0.85–0.96) and 0.97, respectively. The Hosmer–Lemeshow test yielded a non-significant statistic with p-value of 0.59. The clinical usefulness of the combined CC and MLO model was confirmed if the threshold was between 0.02 and 0.81 in the DCA. CONCLUSIONS: Machine learning models based on subtracted images in CESM images were valuable for distinguishing TNBC and NTNBC. The model with the combined CC and MLO features had the best performance compared with models that used CC or MLO features alone. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8733550 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87335502022-01-07 Diagnostic Value of Radiomics Analysis in Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography for Identifying Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Zhang, Yongxia Liu, Fengjie Zhang, Han Ma, Heng Sun, Jian Zhang, Ran Song, Lei Shi, Hao Front Oncol Oncology PURPOSE: To evaluate the value of radiomics analysis in contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) for the identification of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). METHOD: CESM images of 367 pathologically confirmed breast cancer patients (training set: 218, testing set: 149) were retrospectively analyzed. Cranial caudal (CC), mediolateral oblique (MLO), and combined models were built on the basis of the features extracted from subtracted images on CC, MLO, and the combination of CC and MLO, respectively, in the tumour region. The performance of the models was evaluated through receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, the Hosmer-Lemeshow test, and decision curve analysis (DCA). The areas under ROC curves (AUCs) were compared through the DeLong test. RESULTS: The combined CC and MLO model had the best AUC and sensitivity of 0.90 (95% confidence interval: 0.85–0.96) and 0.97, respectively. The Hosmer–Lemeshow test yielded a non-significant statistic with p-value of 0.59. The clinical usefulness of the combined CC and MLO model was confirmed if the threshold was between 0.02 and 0.81 in the DCA. CONCLUSIONS: Machine learning models based on subtracted images in CESM images were valuable for distinguishing TNBC and NTNBC. The model with the combined CC and MLO features had the best performance compared with models that used CC or MLO features alone. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8733550/ /pubmed/35004294 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.773196 Text en Copyright © 2021 Zhang, Liu, Zhang, Ma, Sun, Zhang, Song and Shi https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Oncology Zhang, Yongxia Liu, Fengjie Zhang, Han Ma, Heng Sun, Jian Zhang, Ran Song, Lei Shi, Hao Diagnostic Value of Radiomics Analysis in Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography for Identifying Triple-Negative Breast Cancer |
title | Diagnostic Value of Radiomics Analysis in Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography for Identifying Triple-Negative Breast Cancer |
title_full | Diagnostic Value of Radiomics Analysis in Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography for Identifying Triple-Negative Breast Cancer |
title_fullStr | Diagnostic Value of Radiomics Analysis in Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography for Identifying Triple-Negative Breast Cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Diagnostic Value of Radiomics Analysis in Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography for Identifying Triple-Negative Breast Cancer |
title_short | Diagnostic Value of Radiomics Analysis in Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography for Identifying Triple-Negative Breast Cancer |
title_sort | diagnostic value of radiomics analysis in contrast-enhanced spectral mammography for identifying triple-negative breast cancer |
topic | Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8733550/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35004294 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.773196 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangyongxia diagnosticvalueofradiomicsanalysisincontrastenhancedspectralmammographyforidentifyingtriplenegativebreastcancer AT liufengjie diagnosticvalueofradiomicsanalysisincontrastenhancedspectralmammographyforidentifyingtriplenegativebreastcancer AT zhanghan diagnosticvalueofradiomicsanalysisincontrastenhancedspectralmammographyforidentifyingtriplenegativebreastcancer AT maheng diagnosticvalueofradiomicsanalysisincontrastenhancedspectralmammographyforidentifyingtriplenegativebreastcancer AT sunjian diagnosticvalueofradiomicsanalysisincontrastenhancedspectralmammographyforidentifyingtriplenegativebreastcancer AT zhangran diagnosticvalueofradiomicsanalysisincontrastenhancedspectralmammographyforidentifyingtriplenegativebreastcancer AT songlei diagnosticvalueofradiomicsanalysisincontrastenhancedspectralmammographyforidentifyingtriplenegativebreastcancer AT shihao diagnosticvalueofradiomicsanalysisincontrastenhancedspectralmammographyforidentifyingtriplenegativebreastcancer |