Cargando…
Model Transferability and Reduced Experimental Burden in Cell Culture Process Development Facilitated by Hybrid Modeling and Intensified Design of Experiments
Reliable process development is accompanied by intense experimental effort. The utilization of an intensified design of experiments (iDoE) (intra-experimental critical process parameter (CPP) shifts combined) with hybrid modeling potentially reduces process development burden. The iDoE can provide m...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8733703/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35004635 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2021.740215 |
_version_ | 1784627857236951040 |
---|---|
author | Bayer, Benjamin Duerkop, Mark Striedner, Gerald Sissolak, Bernhard |
author_facet | Bayer, Benjamin Duerkop, Mark Striedner, Gerald Sissolak, Bernhard |
author_sort | Bayer, Benjamin |
collection | PubMed |
description | Reliable process development is accompanied by intense experimental effort. The utilization of an intensified design of experiments (iDoE) (intra-experimental critical process parameter (CPP) shifts combined) with hybrid modeling potentially reduces process development burden. The iDoE can provide more process response information in less overall process time, whereas hybrid modeling serves as a commodity to describe this behavior the best way. Therefore, a combination of both approaches appears beneficial for faster design screening and is especially of interest at larger scales where the costs per experiment rise significantly. Ideally, profound process knowledge is gathered at a small scale and only complemented with few validation experiments on a larger scale, saving valuable resources. In this work, the transferability of hybrid modeling for Chinese hamster ovary cell bioprocess development along process scales was investigated. A two-dimensional DoE was fully characterized in shake flask duplicates (300 ml), containing three different levels for the cultivation temperature and the glucose concentration in the feed. Based on these data, a hybrid model was developed, and its performance was assessed by estimating the viable cell concentration and product titer in 15 L bioprocesses with the same DoE settings. To challenge the modeling approach, 15 L bioprocesses also comprised iDoE runs with intra-experimental CPP shifts, impacting specific cell rates such as growth, consumption, and formation. Subsequently, the applicability of the iDoE cultivations to estimate static cultivations was also investigated. The shaker-scale hybrid model proved suitable for application to a 15 L scale (1:50), estimating the viable cell concentration and the product titer with an NRMSE of 10.92% and 17.79%, respectively. Additionally, the iDoE hybrid model performed comparably, displaying NRMSE values of 13.75% and 21.13%. The low errors when transferring the models from shaker to reactor and between the DoE and the iDoE approach highlight the suitability of hybrid modeling for mammalian cell culture bioprocess development and the potential of iDoE to accelerate process characterization and to improve process understanding. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8733703 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87337032022-01-07 Model Transferability and Reduced Experimental Burden in Cell Culture Process Development Facilitated by Hybrid Modeling and Intensified Design of Experiments Bayer, Benjamin Duerkop, Mark Striedner, Gerald Sissolak, Bernhard Front Bioeng Biotechnol Bioengineering and Biotechnology Reliable process development is accompanied by intense experimental effort. The utilization of an intensified design of experiments (iDoE) (intra-experimental critical process parameter (CPP) shifts combined) with hybrid modeling potentially reduces process development burden. The iDoE can provide more process response information in less overall process time, whereas hybrid modeling serves as a commodity to describe this behavior the best way. Therefore, a combination of both approaches appears beneficial for faster design screening and is especially of interest at larger scales where the costs per experiment rise significantly. Ideally, profound process knowledge is gathered at a small scale and only complemented with few validation experiments on a larger scale, saving valuable resources. In this work, the transferability of hybrid modeling for Chinese hamster ovary cell bioprocess development along process scales was investigated. A two-dimensional DoE was fully characterized in shake flask duplicates (300 ml), containing three different levels for the cultivation temperature and the glucose concentration in the feed. Based on these data, a hybrid model was developed, and its performance was assessed by estimating the viable cell concentration and product titer in 15 L bioprocesses with the same DoE settings. To challenge the modeling approach, 15 L bioprocesses also comprised iDoE runs with intra-experimental CPP shifts, impacting specific cell rates such as growth, consumption, and formation. Subsequently, the applicability of the iDoE cultivations to estimate static cultivations was also investigated. The shaker-scale hybrid model proved suitable for application to a 15 L scale (1:50), estimating the viable cell concentration and the product titer with an NRMSE of 10.92% and 17.79%, respectively. Additionally, the iDoE hybrid model performed comparably, displaying NRMSE values of 13.75% and 21.13%. The low errors when transferring the models from shaker to reactor and between the DoE and the iDoE approach highlight the suitability of hybrid modeling for mammalian cell culture bioprocess development and the potential of iDoE to accelerate process characterization and to improve process understanding. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8733703/ /pubmed/35004635 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2021.740215 Text en Copyright © 2021 Bayer, Duerkop, Striedner and Sissolak. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Bioengineering and Biotechnology Bayer, Benjamin Duerkop, Mark Striedner, Gerald Sissolak, Bernhard Model Transferability and Reduced Experimental Burden in Cell Culture Process Development Facilitated by Hybrid Modeling and Intensified Design of Experiments |
title | Model Transferability and Reduced Experimental Burden in Cell Culture Process Development Facilitated by Hybrid Modeling and Intensified Design of Experiments |
title_full | Model Transferability and Reduced Experimental Burden in Cell Culture Process Development Facilitated by Hybrid Modeling and Intensified Design of Experiments |
title_fullStr | Model Transferability and Reduced Experimental Burden in Cell Culture Process Development Facilitated by Hybrid Modeling and Intensified Design of Experiments |
title_full_unstemmed | Model Transferability and Reduced Experimental Burden in Cell Culture Process Development Facilitated by Hybrid Modeling and Intensified Design of Experiments |
title_short | Model Transferability and Reduced Experimental Burden in Cell Culture Process Development Facilitated by Hybrid Modeling and Intensified Design of Experiments |
title_sort | model transferability and reduced experimental burden in cell culture process development facilitated by hybrid modeling and intensified design of experiments |
topic | Bioengineering and Biotechnology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8733703/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35004635 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2021.740215 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bayerbenjamin modeltransferabilityandreducedexperimentalburdenincellcultureprocessdevelopmentfacilitatedbyhybridmodelingandintensifieddesignofexperiments AT duerkopmark modeltransferabilityandreducedexperimentalburdenincellcultureprocessdevelopmentfacilitatedbyhybridmodelingandintensifieddesignofexperiments AT striednergerald modeltransferabilityandreducedexperimentalburdenincellcultureprocessdevelopmentfacilitatedbyhybridmodelingandintensifieddesignofexperiments AT sissolakbernhard modeltransferabilityandreducedexperimentalburdenincellcultureprocessdevelopmentfacilitatedbyhybridmodelingandintensifieddesignofexperiments |