Cargando…

Preference for initiation of end-of-life care discussion in Indonesia: a quantitative study

BACKGROUND: Initiating discussion about death and dying is often considered a difficult topic for healthcare providers, thus there is a need for further research to understand this area, particularly in developing countries. The aim of this study was to describe preferences for the initiation of end...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eng, Venita, Hewitt, Victoria, Kekalih, Aria
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8733905/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34991565
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-021-00894-0
_version_ 1784627900387950592
author Eng, Venita
Hewitt, Victoria
Kekalih, Aria
author_facet Eng, Venita
Hewitt, Victoria
Kekalih, Aria
author_sort Eng, Venita
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Initiating discussion about death and dying is often considered a difficult topic for healthcare providers, thus there is a need for further research to understand this area, particularly in developing countries. The aim of this study was to describe preferences for the initiation of end-of-life care discussions in Indonesia, comparing the general population and health care professionals. METHODS: This cross-sectional, descriptive study analysed quantitative data from 368 respondents to an online questionnaire (255 general population (69%); 113 healthcare professionals (31%)) utilizing consecutive sampling and snowball sampling methods. RESULTS: Overall, most respondents (80%) stated that they would like to discuss end-of-life issues with a healthcare professional in the case of terminal illness. This was more marked amongst healthcare professionals compared with the general population (94% vs. 75%, respectively, p < 0,001). The preferred time for discussion was at first diagnosis (68% general population, 52% healthcare professionals, p = 0.017) and the preferred person to start the discussion was the doctor (59% general population, 71% healthcare professionals, p = 0.036). Fewer respondents wanted to know about prognosis compared to diagnosis (overall 76% v 93% respectively). CONCLUSION: Doctors have vital role in end-of-life care discussion, and attempts should be made to encourage physicians to initiate these conversations and respond to patient’s requests when needed. These findings contribute to the existing body of knowledge in this area of practice, with focus on a developing country. The role of socio-cultural influences on these conversations warrants further research, in order to develop practical resources to support clinicians to appropriately conduct end-of-life care discussions with their patients and to provide data for policymakers to develop services. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12904-021-00894-0.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8733905
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87339052022-01-06 Preference for initiation of end-of-life care discussion in Indonesia: a quantitative study Eng, Venita Hewitt, Victoria Kekalih, Aria BMC Palliat Care Research Article BACKGROUND: Initiating discussion about death and dying is often considered a difficult topic for healthcare providers, thus there is a need for further research to understand this area, particularly in developing countries. The aim of this study was to describe preferences for the initiation of end-of-life care discussions in Indonesia, comparing the general population and health care professionals. METHODS: This cross-sectional, descriptive study analysed quantitative data from 368 respondents to an online questionnaire (255 general population (69%); 113 healthcare professionals (31%)) utilizing consecutive sampling and snowball sampling methods. RESULTS: Overall, most respondents (80%) stated that they would like to discuss end-of-life issues with a healthcare professional in the case of terminal illness. This was more marked amongst healthcare professionals compared with the general population (94% vs. 75%, respectively, p < 0,001). The preferred time for discussion was at first diagnosis (68% general population, 52% healthcare professionals, p = 0.017) and the preferred person to start the discussion was the doctor (59% general population, 71% healthcare professionals, p = 0.036). Fewer respondents wanted to know about prognosis compared to diagnosis (overall 76% v 93% respectively). CONCLUSION: Doctors have vital role in end-of-life care discussion, and attempts should be made to encourage physicians to initiate these conversations and respond to patient’s requests when needed. These findings contribute to the existing body of knowledge in this area of practice, with focus on a developing country. The role of socio-cultural influences on these conversations warrants further research, in order to develop practical resources to support clinicians to appropriately conduct end-of-life care discussions with their patients and to provide data for policymakers to develop services. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12904-021-00894-0. BioMed Central 2022-01-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8733905/ /pubmed/34991565 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-021-00894-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Eng, Venita
Hewitt, Victoria
Kekalih, Aria
Preference for initiation of end-of-life care discussion in Indonesia: a quantitative study
title Preference for initiation of end-of-life care discussion in Indonesia: a quantitative study
title_full Preference for initiation of end-of-life care discussion in Indonesia: a quantitative study
title_fullStr Preference for initiation of end-of-life care discussion in Indonesia: a quantitative study
title_full_unstemmed Preference for initiation of end-of-life care discussion in Indonesia: a quantitative study
title_short Preference for initiation of end-of-life care discussion in Indonesia: a quantitative study
title_sort preference for initiation of end-of-life care discussion in indonesia: a quantitative study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8733905/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34991565
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-021-00894-0
work_keys_str_mv AT engvenita preferenceforinitiationofendoflifecarediscussioninindonesiaaquantitativestudy
AT hewittvictoria preferenceforinitiationofendoflifecarediscussioninindonesiaaquantitativestudy
AT kekaliharia preferenceforinitiationofendoflifecarediscussioninindonesiaaquantitativestudy