Cargando…

Nationwide evaluation of the advanced clinical practitioner role in England: a cross-sectional survey

BACKGROUND AND STUDY OBJECTIVE: In response to growing pressures on healthcare systems, the advanced clinical practice (ACP) role has been implemented widely in the UK and internationally. In England, ACP is a level of practice applicable across various healthcare professions, who exercise a level o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fothergill, Lauren Jade, Al-Oraibi, Amani, Houdmont, Jonathan, Conway, Joy, Evans, Catrin, Timmons, Stephen, Pearce, Ruth, Blake, Holly
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8734004/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34987045
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055475
_version_ 1784627921745346560
author Fothergill, Lauren Jade
Al-Oraibi, Amani
Houdmont, Jonathan
Conway, Joy
Evans, Catrin
Timmons, Stephen
Pearce, Ruth
Blake, Holly
author_facet Fothergill, Lauren Jade
Al-Oraibi, Amani
Houdmont, Jonathan
Conway, Joy
Evans, Catrin
Timmons, Stephen
Pearce, Ruth
Blake, Holly
author_sort Fothergill, Lauren Jade
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND STUDY OBJECTIVE: In response to growing pressures on healthcare systems, the advanced clinical practice (ACP) role has been implemented widely in the UK and internationally. In England, ACP is a level of practice applicable across various healthcare professions, who exercise a level of autonomy across four domains, referred to as the four pillars of practice (education, leadership, research and clinical practice). A national framework for ACP was established in 2017 to ensure consistency across the ACP role, however current ACP governance, education and support is yet to be evaluated. This study aimed to analyse data from a national survey of the ACP role to inform the development and improvement of policies relating to ACP in the National Health Service (NHS) in England. DESIGN: A cross-sectional survey with free-text comments. SETTING: The survey was distributed across primary and secondary levels of care to three distinct groups in England, including individual ACPs, NHS provider organisations and Trusts and primary care settings. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 4365 surveys were returned, from ACP staff (n=4013), NHS provider organisations and Trusts (n=166) and primary care organisations (n=186). RESULTS: Considerable variation was found in role titles, scope of practice, job descriptions and educational backgrounds of ACPs. Differing approaches to governance were noted, which led to inconsistent ACP frameworks in some organisations. A further challenge highlighted included committing time to work across the four pillars of advanced practice, particularly the research pillar. ACPs called for improvements in supervision and continuing professional development alongside further support in navigating career pathways. CONCLUSIONS: A standardised approach may support ACP workforce development in England and enable ACPs to work across the four pillars of practice. Due to the wide uptake of ACP roles internationally, this study has relevance across professions for global healthcare workforce transformation
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8734004
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87340042022-01-20 Nationwide evaluation of the advanced clinical practitioner role in England: a cross-sectional survey Fothergill, Lauren Jade Al-Oraibi, Amani Houdmont, Jonathan Conway, Joy Evans, Catrin Timmons, Stephen Pearce, Ruth Blake, Holly BMJ Open Medical Education and Training BACKGROUND AND STUDY OBJECTIVE: In response to growing pressures on healthcare systems, the advanced clinical practice (ACP) role has been implemented widely in the UK and internationally. In England, ACP is a level of practice applicable across various healthcare professions, who exercise a level of autonomy across four domains, referred to as the four pillars of practice (education, leadership, research and clinical practice). A national framework for ACP was established in 2017 to ensure consistency across the ACP role, however current ACP governance, education and support is yet to be evaluated. This study aimed to analyse data from a national survey of the ACP role to inform the development and improvement of policies relating to ACP in the National Health Service (NHS) in England. DESIGN: A cross-sectional survey with free-text comments. SETTING: The survey was distributed across primary and secondary levels of care to three distinct groups in England, including individual ACPs, NHS provider organisations and Trusts and primary care settings. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 4365 surveys were returned, from ACP staff (n=4013), NHS provider organisations and Trusts (n=166) and primary care organisations (n=186). RESULTS: Considerable variation was found in role titles, scope of practice, job descriptions and educational backgrounds of ACPs. Differing approaches to governance were noted, which led to inconsistent ACP frameworks in some organisations. A further challenge highlighted included committing time to work across the four pillars of advanced practice, particularly the research pillar. ACPs called for improvements in supervision and continuing professional development alongside further support in navigating career pathways. CONCLUSIONS: A standardised approach may support ACP workforce development in England and enable ACPs to work across the four pillars of practice. Due to the wide uptake of ACP roles internationally, this study has relevance across professions for global healthcare workforce transformation BMJ Publishing Group 2022-01-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8734004/ /pubmed/34987045 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055475 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Medical Education and Training
Fothergill, Lauren Jade
Al-Oraibi, Amani
Houdmont, Jonathan
Conway, Joy
Evans, Catrin
Timmons, Stephen
Pearce, Ruth
Blake, Holly
Nationwide evaluation of the advanced clinical practitioner role in England: a cross-sectional survey
title Nationwide evaluation of the advanced clinical practitioner role in England: a cross-sectional survey
title_full Nationwide evaluation of the advanced clinical practitioner role in England: a cross-sectional survey
title_fullStr Nationwide evaluation of the advanced clinical practitioner role in England: a cross-sectional survey
title_full_unstemmed Nationwide evaluation of the advanced clinical practitioner role in England: a cross-sectional survey
title_short Nationwide evaluation of the advanced clinical practitioner role in England: a cross-sectional survey
title_sort nationwide evaluation of the advanced clinical practitioner role in england: a cross-sectional survey
topic Medical Education and Training
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8734004/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34987045
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055475
work_keys_str_mv AT fothergilllaurenjade nationwideevaluationoftheadvancedclinicalpractitionerroleinenglandacrosssectionalsurvey
AT aloraibiamani nationwideevaluationoftheadvancedclinicalpractitionerroleinenglandacrosssectionalsurvey
AT houdmontjonathan nationwideevaluationoftheadvancedclinicalpractitionerroleinenglandacrosssectionalsurvey
AT conwayjoy nationwideevaluationoftheadvancedclinicalpractitionerroleinenglandacrosssectionalsurvey
AT evanscatrin nationwideevaluationoftheadvancedclinicalpractitionerroleinenglandacrosssectionalsurvey
AT timmonsstephen nationwideevaluationoftheadvancedclinicalpractitionerroleinenglandacrosssectionalsurvey
AT pearceruth nationwideevaluationoftheadvancedclinicalpractitionerroleinenglandacrosssectionalsurvey
AT blakeholly nationwideevaluationoftheadvancedclinicalpractitionerroleinenglandacrosssectionalsurvey