Cargando…

Spin in the neurosurgical trauma literature: prevalence and associated factors – a systematic review protocol

INTRODUCTION: Spin is defined as an inaccurate interpretation of results, intentionally or not, leading to equivocal conclusions and misdirecting readers to look at the data in an overly optimistic way. Previous studies have shown a high prevalence of spin in scientific papers and this systematic re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Oliveira, João Vitor Miranda Porto, Oliveira Júnior, André Luiz Freitas, Kolias, Angelos G, Paiva, Wellingson S, Fontoura Solla, Davi Jorge
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8734005/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34987034
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046602
_version_ 1784627921994907648
author Oliveira, João Vitor Miranda Porto
Oliveira Júnior, André Luiz Freitas
Kolias, Angelos G
Paiva, Wellingson S
Fontoura Solla, Davi Jorge
author_facet Oliveira, João Vitor Miranda Porto
Oliveira Júnior, André Luiz Freitas
Kolias, Angelos G
Paiva, Wellingson S
Fontoura Solla, Davi Jorge
author_sort Oliveira, João Vitor Miranda Porto
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Spin is defined as an inaccurate interpretation of results, intentionally or not, leading to equivocal conclusions and misdirecting readers to look at the data in an overly optimistic way. Previous studies have shown a high prevalence of spin in scientific papers and this systematic review aims to investigate the nature and prevalence of spin in the neurosurgical trauma literature. Any associated factors will be identified to guide future research practice recommendations. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The Preferred Reporting Item for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses recommendations will be followed. Randomised clinical trials (RCTs) that enrolled only patients with traumatic brain injury and investigated any type of intervention (surgical or non-surgical) will be eligible for inclusion. The MEDLINE/PubMed database will be searched for articles in English published in 15 top-ranked journals. Spin will be defined as (1) a focus on statistically significant results not based on the primary outcome; (2) interpreting statistically non-significant results for a superiority analysis of the primary outcome; (3) claiming or emphasising the beneficial effect of the treatment despite statistically non-significant results; (4) conclusion focused in the per-protocol or as-treated analysis instead of the intention-to-treat results; (5) incorrect statistical analysis; (6) republication of a significant secondary analysis without proper acknowledgement of the primary outcome analysis result. Traditional descriptive statistics will be used to present RCT characteristics. Standardised differences between the groups with or without spin will be calculated. The variables with a standardised difference equal or above 0.2 and 0.5 will be considered weakly and strongly associated with spin, respectively. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study will not involve primary data collection and patients will not be involved. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: 10.17605/OSF.IO/H3FGY.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8734005
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87340052022-01-20 Spin in the neurosurgical trauma literature: prevalence and associated factors – a systematic review protocol Oliveira, João Vitor Miranda Porto Oliveira Júnior, André Luiz Freitas Kolias, Angelos G Paiva, Wellingson S Fontoura Solla, Davi Jorge BMJ Open Neurology INTRODUCTION: Spin is defined as an inaccurate interpretation of results, intentionally or not, leading to equivocal conclusions and misdirecting readers to look at the data in an overly optimistic way. Previous studies have shown a high prevalence of spin in scientific papers and this systematic review aims to investigate the nature and prevalence of spin in the neurosurgical trauma literature. Any associated factors will be identified to guide future research practice recommendations. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The Preferred Reporting Item for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses recommendations will be followed. Randomised clinical trials (RCTs) that enrolled only patients with traumatic brain injury and investigated any type of intervention (surgical or non-surgical) will be eligible for inclusion. The MEDLINE/PubMed database will be searched for articles in English published in 15 top-ranked journals. Spin will be defined as (1) a focus on statistically significant results not based on the primary outcome; (2) interpreting statistically non-significant results for a superiority analysis of the primary outcome; (3) claiming or emphasising the beneficial effect of the treatment despite statistically non-significant results; (4) conclusion focused in the per-protocol or as-treated analysis instead of the intention-to-treat results; (5) incorrect statistical analysis; (6) republication of a significant secondary analysis without proper acknowledgement of the primary outcome analysis result. Traditional descriptive statistics will be used to present RCT characteristics. Standardised differences between the groups with or without spin will be calculated. The variables with a standardised difference equal or above 0.2 and 0.5 will be considered weakly and strongly associated with spin, respectively. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study will not involve primary data collection and patients will not be involved. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: 10.17605/OSF.IO/H3FGY. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-01-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8734005/ /pubmed/34987034 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046602 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Neurology
Oliveira, João Vitor Miranda Porto
Oliveira Júnior, André Luiz Freitas
Kolias, Angelos G
Paiva, Wellingson S
Fontoura Solla, Davi Jorge
Spin in the neurosurgical trauma literature: prevalence and associated factors – a systematic review protocol
title Spin in the neurosurgical trauma literature: prevalence and associated factors – a systematic review protocol
title_full Spin in the neurosurgical trauma literature: prevalence and associated factors – a systematic review protocol
title_fullStr Spin in the neurosurgical trauma literature: prevalence and associated factors – a systematic review protocol
title_full_unstemmed Spin in the neurosurgical trauma literature: prevalence and associated factors – a systematic review protocol
title_short Spin in the neurosurgical trauma literature: prevalence and associated factors – a systematic review protocol
title_sort spin in the neurosurgical trauma literature: prevalence and associated factors – a systematic review protocol
topic Neurology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8734005/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34987034
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046602
work_keys_str_mv AT oliveirajoaovitormirandaporto spinintheneurosurgicaltraumaliteratureprevalenceandassociatedfactorsasystematicreviewprotocol
AT oliveirajuniorandreluizfreitas spinintheneurosurgicaltraumaliteratureprevalenceandassociatedfactorsasystematicreviewprotocol
AT koliasangelosg spinintheneurosurgicaltraumaliteratureprevalenceandassociatedfactorsasystematicreviewprotocol
AT paivawellingsons spinintheneurosurgicaltraumaliteratureprevalenceandassociatedfactorsasystematicreviewprotocol
AT fontourasolladavijorge spinintheneurosurgicaltraumaliteratureprevalenceandassociatedfactorsasystematicreviewprotocol