Cargando…
Implementing an enhanced recovery after thoracic surgery programme in the Netherlands: a qualitative study investigating facilitators and barriers for implementation
OBJECTIVES: This study aims to elucidate determinants for succesful implementation of the Enhanced Recovery After Thoracic Surgery (ERATS) protocol for perioperative care for surgical lung cancer patients in the Netherlands. SETTING: Lung cancer operations are performed in both academic and regional...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8734011/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34987041 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051513 |
_version_ | 1784627923514294272 |
---|---|
author | von Meyenfeldt, Erik M van Nassau, Femke de Betue, Carlijn T I Barberio, L Schreurs, Wilhelmina H Marres, Geertruid M H Bonjer, H Jaap Anema, Johannes |
author_facet | von Meyenfeldt, Erik M van Nassau, Femke de Betue, Carlijn T I Barberio, L Schreurs, Wilhelmina H Marres, Geertruid M H Bonjer, H Jaap Anema, Johannes |
author_sort | von Meyenfeldt, Erik M |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: This study aims to elucidate determinants for succesful implementation of the Enhanced Recovery After Thoracic Surgery (ERATS) protocol for perioperative care for surgical lung cancer patients in the Netherlands. SETTING: Lung cancer operations are performed in both academic and regional hospitals, either by cardiothoracic or general thoracic surgeons. Limiting the impact of these operations by optimising and standardising perioperative care with the ERATS protocol is thought to enable reduction in length of stay, complications and costs. PARTICIPANTS: A broad spectrum of stakeholders in perioperative care for patients with lung resection participated in this study, ranging from patient representatives, healthcare professionals to an insurance company representative. INTERVENTIONS: Semistructured interviews (N=14) were conducted with the stakeholders (N=18). The interviews were conducted one on one by telephone and two times, face to face, in small groups. Verbatim transcriptions of these interviews were coded for the purpose of thematic analysis. OUTCOME MEASURES: Determinants for successful implementation of the ERATS protocol in the Netherlands. RESULTS: Several determinants correspond with previous publications: having a multidisciplinary team, leadership from a senior clinician and support from an ERAS-coordinator as facilitators; lack of feedback on performance and absence of management support as barriers. Our study underscores the potential detrimental effect of inconsistent communication, the lack of support in the transition from hospital to home and the barrier posed by lack of accessible audit data. CONCLUSIONS: Based on a structured problem analysis among a wide selection of stakeholders, this study provides a solid basis for choosing adequate implementation strategies to introduce the ERATS protocol in the Netherlands. Emphasis on consistent and sufficient communication, support in the transition from hospital to home and adequate audit and feedback data, in addition to established implementation strategies for ERAS-type programmes, will enable a tailored approach to implementation of ERATS in the Dutch context. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8734011 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87340112022-01-20 Implementing an enhanced recovery after thoracic surgery programme in the Netherlands: a qualitative study investigating facilitators and barriers for implementation von Meyenfeldt, Erik M van Nassau, Femke de Betue, Carlijn T I Barberio, L Schreurs, Wilhelmina H Marres, Geertruid M H Bonjer, H Jaap Anema, Johannes BMJ Open Surgery OBJECTIVES: This study aims to elucidate determinants for succesful implementation of the Enhanced Recovery After Thoracic Surgery (ERATS) protocol for perioperative care for surgical lung cancer patients in the Netherlands. SETTING: Lung cancer operations are performed in both academic and regional hospitals, either by cardiothoracic or general thoracic surgeons. Limiting the impact of these operations by optimising and standardising perioperative care with the ERATS protocol is thought to enable reduction in length of stay, complications and costs. PARTICIPANTS: A broad spectrum of stakeholders in perioperative care for patients with lung resection participated in this study, ranging from patient representatives, healthcare professionals to an insurance company representative. INTERVENTIONS: Semistructured interviews (N=14) were conducted with the stakeholders (N=18). The interviews were conducted one on one by telephone and two times, face to face, in small groups. Verbatim transcriptions of these interviews were coded for the purpose of thematic analysis. OUTCOME MEASURES: Determinants for successful implementation of the ERATS protocol in the Netherlands. RESULTS: Several determinants correspond with previous publications: having a multidisciplinary team, leadership from a senior clinician and support from an ERAS-coordinator as facilitators; lack of feedback on performance and absence of management support as barriers. Our study underscores the potential detrimental effect of inconsistent communication, the lack of support in the transition from hospital to home and the barrier posed by lack of accessible audit data. CONCLUSIONS: Based on a structured problem analysis among a wide selection of stakeholders, this study provides a solid basis for choosing adequate implementation strategies to introduce the ERATS protocol in the Netherlands. Emphasis on consistent and sufficient communication, support in the transition from hospital to home and adequate audit and feedback data, in addition to established implementation strategies for ERAS-type programmes, will enable a tailored approach to implementation of ERATS in the Dutch context. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-01-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8734011/ /pubmed/34987041 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051513 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Surgery von Meyenfeldt, Erik M van Nassau, Femke de Betue, Carlijn T I Barberio, L Schreurs, Wilhelmina H Marres, Geertruid M H Bonjer, H Jaap Anema, Johannes Implementing an enhanced recovery after thoracic surgery programme in the Netherlands: a qualitative study investigating facilitators and barriers for implementation |
title | Implementing an enhanced recovery after thoracic surgery programme in the Netherlands: a qualitative study investigating facilitators and barriers for implementation |
title_full | Implementing an enhanced recovery after thoracic surgery programme in the Netherlands: a qualitative study investigating facilitators and barriers for implementation |
title_fullStr | Implementing an enhanced recovery after thoracic surgery programme in the Netherlands: a qualitative study investigating facilitators and barriers for implementation |
title_full_unstemmed | Implementing an enhanced recovery after thoracic surgery programme in the Netherlands: a qualitative study investigating facilitators and barriers for implementation |
title_short | Implementing an enhanced recovery after thoracic surgery programme in the Netherlands: a qualitative study investigating facilitators and barriers for implementation |
title_sort | implementing an enhanced recovery after thoracic surgery programme in the netherlands: a qualitative study investigating facilitators and barriers for implementation |
topic | Surgery |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8734011/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34987041 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051513 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vonmeyenfeldterikm implementinganenhancedrecoveryafterthoracicsurgeryprogrammeinthenetherlandsaqualitativestudyinvestigatingfacilitatorsandbarriersforimplementation AT vannassaufemke implementinganenhancedrecoveryafterthoracicsurgeryprogrammeinthenetherlandsaqualitativestudyinvestigatingfacilitatorsandbarriersforimplementation AT debetuecarlijnti implementinganenhancedrecoveryafterthoracicsurgeryprogrammeinthenetherlandsaqualitativestudyinvestigatingfacilitatorsandbarriersforimplementation AT barberiol implementinganenhancedrecoveryafterthoracicsurgeryprogrammeinthenetherlandsaqualitativestudyinvestigatingfacilitatorsandbarriersforimplementation AT schreurswilhelminah implementinganenhancedrecoveryafterthoracicsurgeryprogrammeinthenetherlandsaqualitativestudyinvestigatingfacilitatorsandbarriersforimplementation AT marresgeertruidmh implementinganenhancedrecoveryafterthoracicsurgeryprogrammeinthenetherlandsaqualitativestudyinvestigatingfacilitatorsandbarriersforimplementation AT bonjerhjaap implementinganenhancedrecoveryafterthoracicsurgeryprogrammeinthenetherlandsaqualitativestudyinvestigatingfacilitatorsandbarriersforimplementation AT anemajohannes implementinganenhancedrecoveryafterthoracicsurgeryprogrammeinthenetherlandsaqualitativestudyinvestigatingfacilitatorsandbarriersforimplementation |