Cargando…

Molecular Evaluation of Endometrial Dedifferentiated Carcinoma, Endometrioid Carcinoma, Carcinosarcoma, and Serous Carcinoma Using a Custom-Made Small Cancer Panel

It is often difficult to histologically differentiate among endometrial dedifferentiated carcinoma (DC), endometrioid carcinoma (EC), serous carcinoma (SC), and carcinosarcoma (CS) due to the presence of solid components. In this study, we aimed to categorize these carcinomas according to The Cancer...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kobayashi, Yusuke, Kitazono, Ikumi, Akahane, Toshiaki, Yanazume, Shintaro, Kamio, Masaki, Togami, Shinichi, Nohara, Sachio, Sakamoto, Ippei, Yokoyama, Seiya, Tabata, Kazuhiro, Kobayashi, Hiroaki, Tanimoto, Akihide
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8734147/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35002543
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/pore.2021.1610013
_version_ 1784627955392053248
author Kobayashi, Yusuke
Kitazono, Ikumi
Akahane, Toshiaki
Yanazume, Shintaro
Kamio, Masaki
Togami, Shinichi
Nohara, Sachio
Sakamoto, Ippei
Yokoyama, Seiya
Tabata, Kazuhiro
Kobayashi, Hiroaki
Tanimoto, Akihide
author_facet Kobayashi, Yusuke
Kitazono, Ikumi
Akahane, Toshiaki
Yanazume, Shintaro
Kamio, Masaki
Togami, Shinichi
Nohara, Sachio
Sakamoto, Ippei
Yokoyama, Seiya
Tabata, Kazuhiro
Kobayashi, Hiroaki
Tanimoto, Akihide
author_sort Kobayashi, Yusuke
collection PubMed
description It is often difficult to histologically differentiate among endometrial dedifferentiated carcinoma (DC), endometrioid carcinoma (EC), serous carcinoma (SC), and carcinosarcoma (CS) due to the presence of solid components. In this study, we aimed to categorize these carcinomas according to The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) classification using a small custom-made cancer genome panel (56 genes and 17 microsatellite regions) for integrated molecular diagnosis. A total of 36 endometrial cancer cases with solid components were assessed using IHC, next-generation sequencing (NGS), and the custom-made panel. Among 19 EC cases, six were categorized as MMR-deficient (MMR-d) and eight were classified as having a nonspecific molecular profile. Three EC cases were classified as POLE mutation (POLEmut)-type, which had a very high tumor mutation burden (TMB) and low microsatellite instability (MSI). Increased TMB and MSI were observed in all three DC cases, classified as MMR-d with mutations in MLH1 and POLD1. Except for one case classified as MMR-d, all SC cases exhibited TP53 mutations and were classified as p53 mutation-type. SC cases also exhibited amplification of CCND1, CCNE1, and MYC. CS cases were classified as three TCGA types other than the POLEmut-type. The IHC results for p53 and ARID1A were almost consistent with their mutation status. NGS analysis using a small panel enables categorization of endometrial cancers with solid proliferation according to TCGA classification. As TCGA molecular classification does not consider histological findings, an integrated analytical procedure including IHC and NGS may be a practical diagnostic tool for endometrial cancers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8734147
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87341472022-01-07 Molecular Evaluation of Endometrial Dedifferentiated Carcinoma, Endometrioid Carcinoma, Carcinosarcoma, and Serous Carcinoma Using a Custom-Made Small Cancer Panel Kobayashi, Yusuke Kitazono, Ikumi Akahane, Toshiaki Yanazume, Shintaro Kamio, Masaki Togami, Shinichi Nohara, Sachio Sakamoto, Ippei Yokoyama, Seiya Tabata, Kazuhiro Kobayashi, Hiroaki Tanimoto, Akihide Pathol Oncol Res Pathology and Oncology Archive It is often difficult to histologically differentiate among endometrial dedifferentiated carcinoma (DC), endometrioid carcinoma (EC), serous carcinoma (SC), and carcinosarcoma (CS) due to the presence of solid components. In this study, we aimed to categorize these carcinomas according to The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) classification using a small custom-made cancer genome panel (56 genes and 17 microsatellite regions) for integrated molecular diagnosis. A total of 36 endometrial cancer cases with solid components were assessed using IHC, next-generation sequencing (NGS), and the custom-made panel. Among 19 EC cases, six were categorized as MMR-deficient (MMR-d) and eight were classified as having a nonspecific molecular profile. Three EC cases were classified as POLE mutation (POLEmut)-type, which had a very high tumor mutation burden (TMB) and low microsatellite instability (MSI). Increased TMB and MSI were observed in all three DC cases, classified as MMR-d with mutations in MLH1 and POLD1. Except for one case classified as MMR-d, all SC cases exhibited TP53 mutations and were classified as p53 mutation-type. SC cases also exhibited amplification of CCND1, CCNE1, and MYC. CS cases were classified as three TCGA types other than the POLEmut-type. The IHC results for p53 and ARID1A were almost consistent with their mutation status. NGS analysis using a small panel enables categorization of endometrial cancers with solid proliferation according to TCGA classification. As TCGA molecular classification does not consider histological findings, an integrated analytical procedure including IHC and NGS may be a practical diagnostic tool for endometrial cancers. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8734147/ /pubmed/35002543 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/pore.2021.1610013 Text en Copyright © 2021 Kobayashi, Kitazono, Akahane, Yanazume, Kamio, Togami, Nohara, Sakamoto, Yokoyama, Tabata, Kobayashi and Tanimoto. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Pathology and Oncology Archive
Kobayashi, Yusuke
Kitazono, Ikumi
Akahane, Toshiaki
Yanazume, Shintaro
Kamio, Masaki
Togami, Shinichi
Nohara, Sachio
Sakamoto, Ippei
Yokoyama, Seiya
Tabata, Kazuhiro
Kobayashi, Hiroaki
Tanimoto, Akihide
Molecular Evaluation of Endometrial Dedifferentiated Carcinoma, Endometrioid Carcinoma, Carcinosarcoma, and Serous Carcinoma Using a Custom-Made Small Cancer Panel
title Molecular Evaluation of Endometrial Dedifferentiated Carcinoma, Endometrioid Carcinoma, Carcinosarcoma, and Serous Carcinoma Using a Custom-Made Small Cancer Panel
title_full Molecular Evaluation of Endometrial Dedifferentiated Carcinoma, Endometrioid Carcinoma, Carcinosarcoma, and Serous Carcinoma Using a Custom-Made Small Cancer Panel
title_fullStr Molecular Evaluation of Endometrial Dedifferentiated Carcinoma, Endometrioid Carcinoma, Carcinosarcoma, and Serous Carcinoma Using a Custom-Made Small Cancer Panel
title_full_unstemmed Molecular Evaluation of Endometrial Dedifferentiated Carcinoma, Endometrioid Carcinoma, Carcinosarcoma, and Serous Carcinoma Using a Custom-Made Small Cancer Panel
title_short Molecular Evaluation of Endometrial Dedifferentiated Carcinoma, Endometrioid Carcinoma, Carcinosarcoma, and Serous Carcinoma Using a Custom-Made Small Cancer Panel
title_sort molecular evaluation of endometrial dedifferentiated carcinoma, endometrioid carcinoma, carcinosarcoma, and serous carcinoma using a custom-made small cancer panel
topic Pathology and Oncology Archive
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8734147/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35002543
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/pore.2021.1610013
work_keys_str_mv AT kobayashiyusuke molecularevaluationofendometrialdedifferentiatedcarcinomaendometrioidcarcinomacarcinosarcomaandserouscarcinomausingacustommadesmallcancerpanel
AT kitazonoikumi molecularevaluationofendometrialdedifferentiatedcarcinomaendometrioidcarcinomacarcinosarcomaandserouscarcinomausingacustommadesmallcancerpanel
AT akahanetoshiaki molecularevaluationofendometrialdedifferentiatedcarcinomaendometrioidcarcinomacarcinosarcomaandserouscarcinomausingacustommadesmallcancerpanel
AT yanazumeshintaro molecularevaluationofendometrialdedifferentiatedcarcinomaendometrioidcarcinomacarcinosarcomaandserouscarcinomausingacustommadesmallcancerpanel
AT kamiomasaki molecularevaluationofendometrialdedifferentiatedcarcinomaendometrioidcarcinomacarcinosarcomaandserouscarcinomausingacustommadesmallcancerpanel
AT togamishinichi molecularevaluationofendometrialdedifferentiatedcarcinomaendometrioidcarcinomacarcinosarcomaandserouscarcinomausingacustommadesmallcancerpanel
AT noharasachio molecularevaluationofendometrialdedifferentiatedcarcinomaendometrioidcarcinomacarcinosarcomaandserouscarcinomausingacustommadesmallcancerpanel
AT sakamotoippei molecularevaluationofendometrialdedifferentiatedcarcinomaendometrioidcarcinomacarcinosarcomaandserouscarcinomausingacustommadesmallcancerpanel
AT yokoyamaseiya molecularevaluationofendometrialdedifferentiatedcarcinomaendometrioidcarcinomacarcinosarcomaandserouscarcinomausingacustommadesmallcancerpanel
AT tabatakazuhiro molecularevaluationofendometrialdedifferentiatedcarcinomaendometrioidcarcinomacarcinosarcomaandserouscarcinomausingacustommadesmallcancerpanel
AT kobayashihiroaki molecularevaluationofendometrialdedifferentiatedcarcinomaendometrioidcarcinomacarcinosarcomaandserouscarcinomausingacustommadesmallcancerpanel
AT tanimotoakihide molecularevaluationofendometrialdedifferentiatedcarcinomaendometrioidcarcinomacarcinosarcomaandserouscarcinomausingacustommadesmallcancerpanel