Cargando…
Molecular Evaluation of Endometrial Dedifferentiated Carcinoma, Endometrioid Carcinoma, Carcinosarcoma, and Serous Carcinoma Using a Custom-Made Small Cancer Panel
It is often difficult to histologically differentiate among endometrial dedifferentiated carcinoma (DC), endometrioid carcinoma (EC), serous carcinoma (SC), and carcinosarcoma (CS) due to the presence of solid components. In this study, we aimed to categorize these carcinomas according to The Cancer...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8734147/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35002543 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/pore.2021.1610013 |
_version_ | 1784627955392053248 |
---|---|
author | Kobayashi, Yusuke Kitazono, Ikumi Akahane, Toshiaki Yanazume, Shintaro Kamio, Masaki Togami, Shinichi Nohara, Sachio Sakamoto, Ippei Yokoyama, Seiya Tabata, Kazuhiro Kobayashi, Hiroaki Tanimoto, Akihide |
author_facet | Kobayashi, Yusuke Kitazono, Ikumi Akahane, Toshiaki Yanazume, Shintaro Kamio, Masaki Togami, Shinichi Nohara, Sachio Sakamoto, Ippei Yokoyama, Seiya Tabata, Kazuhiro Kobayashi, Hiroaki Tanimoto, Akihide |
author_sort | Kobayashi, Yusuke |
collection | PubMed |
description | It is often difficult to histologically differentiate among endometrial dedifferentiated carcinoma (DC), endometrioid carcinoma (EC), serous carcinoma (SC), and carcinosarcoma (CS) due to the presence of solid components. In this study, we aimed to categorize these carcinomas according to The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) classification using a small custom-made cancer genome panel (56 genes and 17 microsatellite regions) for integrated molecular diagnosis. A total of 36 endometrial cancer cases with solid components were assessed using IHC, next-generation sequencing (NGS), and the custom-made panel. Among 19 EC cases, six were categorized as MMR-deficient (MMR-d) and eight were classified as having a nonspecific molecular profile. Three EC cases were classified as POLE mutation (POLEmut)-type, which had a very high tumor mutation burden (TMB) and low microsatellite instability (MSI). Increased TMB and MSI were observed in all three DC cases, classified as MMR-d with mutations in MLH1 and POLD1. Except for one case classified as MMR-d, all SC cases exhibited TP53 mutations and were classified as p53 mutation-type. SC cases also exhibited amplification of CCND1, CCNE1, and MYC. CS cases were classified as three TCGA types other than the POLEmut-type. The IHC results for p53 and ARID1A were almost consistent with their mutation status. NGS analysis using a small panel enables categorization of endometrial cancers with solid proliferation according to TCGA classification. As TCGA molecular classification does not consider histological findings, an integrated analytical procedure including IHC and NGS may be a practical diagnostic tool for endometrial cancers. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8734147 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87341472022-01-07 Molecular Evaluation of Endometrial Dedifferentiated Carcinoma, Endometrioid Carcinoma, Carcinosarcoma, and Serous Carcinoma Using a Custom-Made Small Cancer Panel Kobayashi, Yusuke Kitazono, Ikumi Akahane, Toshiaki Yanazume, Shintaro Kamio, Masaki Togami, Shinichi Nohara, Sachio Sakamoto, Ippei Yokoyama, Seiya Tabata, Kazuhiro Kobayashi, Hiroaki Tanimoto, Akihide Pathol Oncol Res Pathology and Oncology Archive It is often difficult to histologically differentiate among endometrial dedifferentiated carcinoma (DC), endometrioid carcinoma (EC), serous carcinoma (SC), and carcinosarcoma (CS) due to the presence of solid components. In this study, we aimed to categorize these carcinomas according to The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) classification using a small custom-made cancer genome panel (56 genes and 17 microsatellite regions) for integrated molecular diagnosis. A total of 36 endometrial cancer cases with solid components were assessed using IHC, next-generation sequencing (NGS), and the custom-made panel. Among 19 EC cases, six were categorized as MMR-deficient (MMR-d) and eight were classified as having a nonspecific molecular profile. Three EC cases were classified as POLE mutation (POLEmut)-type, which had a very high tumor mutation burden (TMB) and low microsatellite instability (MSI). Increased TMB and MSI were observed in all three DC cases, classified as MMR-d with mutations in MLH1 and POLD1. Except for one case classified as MMR-d, all SC cases exhibited TP53 mutations and were classified as p53 mutation-type. SC cases also exhibited amplification of CCND1, CCNE1, and MYC. CS cases were classified as three TCGA types other than the POLEmut-type. The IHC results for p53 and ARID1A were almost consistent with their mutation status. NGS analysis using a small panel enables categorization of endometrial cancers with solid proliferation according to TCGA classification. As TCGA molecular classification does not consider histological findings, an integrated analytical procedure including IHC and NGS may be a practical diagnostic tool for endometrial cancers. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8734147/ /pubmed/35002543 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/pore.2021.1610013 Text en Copyright © 2021 Kobayashi, Kitazono, Akahane, Yanazume, Kamio, Togami, Nohara, Sakamoto, Yokoyama, Tabata, Kobayashi and Tanimoto. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Pathology and Oncology Archive Kobayashi, Yusuke Kitazono, Ikumi Akahane, Toshiaki Yanazume, Shintaro Kamio, Masaki Togami, Shinichi Nohara, Sachio Sakamoto, Ippei Yokoyama, Seiya Tabata, Kazuhiro Kobayashi, Hiroaki Tanimoto, Akihide Molecular Evaluation of Endometrial Dedifferentiated Carcinoma, Endometrioid Carcinoma, Carcinosarcoma, and Serous Carcinoma Using a Custom-Made Small Cancer Panel |
title | Molecular Evaluation of Endometrial Dedifferentiated Carcinoma, Endometrioid Carcinoma, Carcinosarcoma, and Serous Carcinoma Using a Custom-Made Small Cancer Panel |
title_full | Molecular Evaluation of Endometrial Dedifferentiated Carcinoma, Endometrioid Carcinoma, Carcinosarcoma, and Serous Carcinoma Using a Custom-Made Small Cancer Panel |
title_fullStr | Molecular Evaluation of Endometrial Dedifferentiated Carcinoma, Endometrioid Carcinoma, Carcinosarcoma, and Serous Carcinoma Using a Custom-Made Small Cancer Panel |
title_full_unstemmed | Molecular Evaluation of Endometrial Dedifferentiated Carcinoma, Endometrioid Carcinoma, Carcinosarcoma, and Serous Carcinoma Using a Custom-Made Small Cancer Panel |
title_short | Molecular Evaluation of Endometrial Dedifferentiated Carcinoma, Endometrioid Carcinoma, Carcinosarcoma, and Serous Carcinoma Using a Custom-Made Small Cancer Panel |
title_sort | molecular evaluation of endometrial dedifferentiated carcinoma, endometrioid carcinoma, carcinosarcoma, and serous carcinoma using a custom-made small cancer panel |
topic | Pathology and Oncology Archive |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8734147/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35002543 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/pore.2021.1610013 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kobayashiyusuke molecularevaluationofendometrialdedifferentiatedcarcinomaendometrioidcarcinomacarcinosarcomaandserouscarcinomausingacustommadesmallcancerpanel AT kitazonoikumi molecularevaluationofendometrialdedifferentiatedcarcinomaendometrioidcarcinomacarcinosarcomaandserouscarcinomausingacustommadesmallcancerpanel AT akahanetoshiaki molecularevaluationofendometrialdedifferentiatedcarcinomaendometrioidcarcinomacarcinosarcomaandserouscarcinomausingacustommadesmallcancerpanel AT yanazumeshintaro molecularevaluationofendometrialdedifferentiatedcarcinomaendometrioidcarcinomacarcinosarcomaandserouscarcinomausingacustommadesmallcancerpanel AT kamiomasaki molecularevaluationofendometrialdedifferentiatedcarcinomaendometrioidcarcinomacarcinosarcomaandserouscarcinomausingacustommadesmallcancerpanel AT togamishinichi molecularevaluationofendometrialdedifferentiatedcarcinomaendometrioidcarcinomacarcinosarcomaandserouscarcinomausingacustommadesmallcancerpanel AT noharasachio molecularevaluationofendometrialdedifferentiatedcarcinomaendometrioidcarcinomacarcinosarcomaandserouscarcinomausingacustommadesmallcancerpanel AT sakamotoippei molecularevaluationofendometrialdedifferentiatedcarcinomaendometrioidcarcinomacarcinosarcomaandserouscarcinomausingacustommadesmallcancerpanel AT yokoyamaseiya molecularevaluationofendometrialdedifferentiatedcarcinomaendometrioidcarcinomacarcinosarcomaandserouscarcinomausingacustommadesmallcancerpanel AT tabatakazuhiro molecularevaluationofendometrialdedifferentiatedcarcinomaendometrioidcarcinomacarcinosarcomaandserouscarcinomausingacustommadesmallcancerpanel AT kobayashihiroaki molecularevaluationofendometrialdedifferentiatedcarcinomaendometrioidcarcinomacarcinosarcomaandserouscarcinomausingacustommadesmallcancerpanel AT tanimotoakihide molecularevaluationofendometrialdedifferentiatedcarcinomaendometrioidcarcinomacarcinosarcomaandserouscarcinomausingacustommadesmallcancerpanel |