Cargando…

Emotion regulation-enhanced group treatment for gambling disorder: a non-randomized pilot trial

BACKGROUND: Despite the association of Gambling Disorder (GD) with poor mental health, treatment options generally lack components targeting emotional difficulties. This study investigated the feasibility and acceptability of adding strategies of emotion regulation to an eight-session weekly group t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Månsson, Viktor, Molander, Olof, Carlbring, Per, Rosendahl, Ingvar, Berman, Anne H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8734318/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34991511
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-021-03630-3
_version_ 1784627991943315456
author Månsson, Viktor
Molander, Olof
Carlbring, Per
Rosendahl, Ingvar
Berman, Anne H.
author_facet Månsson, Viktor
Molander, Olof
Carlbring, Per
Rosendahl, Ingvar
Berman, Anne H.
author_sort Månsson, Viktor
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Despite the association of Gambling Disorder (GD) with poor mental health, treatment options generally lack components targeting emotional difficulties. This study investigated the feasibility and acceptability of adding strategies of emotion regulation to an eight-session weekly group treatment. METHOD: This non-randomized pilot study recruited 21 treatment-seeking adults with GD, (mean age = 36.3, 19% females) from addiction care. In a mixed methods design, measures of within-group changes in self-reported symptoms of GD were complemented with thematic analysis of post-treatment interviews regarding the feasibility of the treatment. RESULTS: Within-group scores on the Gambling Symptoms Assessment Scale (G-SAS) showed a 47% decrease (β: -0.1599, 95% CI: − 0.2526 to − 0.0500) from pre-treatment to 12-month follow-up, with Hedges’ g = 1.07 (CI: 0.57–1.60). The number of GD-symptoms according to the Structured Clinical Interview for Gambling Disorder (SCI-GD) decreased from 7.0 (SD = 1.60) at pre-treatment to 2.1 (SD = 2.36) at 12-month follow-up. Participants completed an average of 6.3 sessions and rated the intervention high in satisfaction and acceptability. Feasibility interviews showed no noticeable negative effects or ethical issues. Furthermore, helpful components in the treatment were: increased awareness of emotional processes and strategies to deal with difficult emotions. CONCLUSIONS: Adding emotion regulation strategies in the treatment of GD is feasible and acceptable and warrants further investigation in a controlled trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier NCT03725735).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8734318
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87343182022-01-07 Emotion regulation-enhanced group treatment for gambling disorder: a non-randomized pilot trial Månsson, Viktor Molander, Olof Carlbring, Per Rosendahl, Ingvar Berman, Anne H. BMC Psychiatry Research Article BACKGROUND: Despite the association of Gambling Disorder (GD) with poor mental health, treatment options generally lack components targeting emotional difficulties. This study investigated the feasibility and acceptability of adding strategies of emotion regulation to an eight-session weekly group treatment. METHOD: This non-randomized pilot study recruited 21 treatment-seeking adults with GD, (mean age = 36.3, 19% females) from addiction care. In a mixed methods design, measures of within-group changes in self-reported symptoms of GD were complemented with thematic analysis of post-treatment interviews regarding the feasibility of the treatment. RESULTS: Within-group scores on the Gambling Symptoms Assessment Scale (G-SAS) showed a 47% decrease (β: -0.1599, 95% CI: − 0.2526 to − 0.0500) from pre-treatment to 12-month follow-up, with Hedges’ g = 1.07 (CI: 0.57–1.60). The number of GD-symptoms according to the Structured Clinical Interview for Gambling Disorder (SCI-GD) decreased from 7.0 (SD = 1.60) at pre-treatment to 2.1 (SD = 2.36) at 12-month follow-up. Participants completed an average of 6.3 sessions and rated the intervention high in satisfaction and acceptability. Feasibility interviews showed no noticeable negative effects or ethical issues. Furthermore, helpful components in the treatment were: increased awareness of emotional processes and strategies to deal with difficult emotions. CONCLUSIONS: Adding emotion regulation strategies in the treatment of GD is feasible and acceptable and warrants further investigation in a controlled trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier NCT03725735). BioMed Central 2022-01-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8734318/ /pubmed/34991511 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-021-03630-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2022, corrected publication 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Månsson, Viktor
Molander, Olof
Carlbring, Per
Rosendahl, Ingvar
Berman, Anne H.
Emotion regulation-enhanced group treatment for gambling disorder: a non-randomized pilot trial
title Emotion regulation-enhanced group treatment for gambling disorder: a non-randomized pilot trial
title_full Emotion regulation-enhanced group treatment for gambling disorder: a non-randomized pilot trial
title_fullStr Emotion regulation-enhanced group treatment for gambling disorder: a non-randomized pilot trial
title_full_unstemmed Emotion regulation-enhanced group treatment for gambling disorder: a non-randomized pilot trial
title_short Emotion regulation-enhanced group treatment for gambling disorder: a non-randomized pilot trial
title_sort emotion regulation-enhanced group treatment for gambling disorder: a non-randomized pilot trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8734318/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34991511
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-021-03630-3
work_keys_str_mv AT manssonviktor emotionregulationenhancedgrouptreatmentforgamblingdisorderanonrandomizedpilottrial
AT molanderolof emotionregulationenhancedgrouptreatmentforgamblingdisorderanonrandomizedpilottrial
AT carlbringper emotionregulationenhancedgrouptreatmentforgamblingdisorderanonrandomizedpilottrial
AT rosendahlingvar emotionregulationenhancedgrouptreatmentforgamblingdisorderanonrandomizedpilottrial
AT bermananneh emotionregulationenhancedgrouptreatmentforgamblingdisorderanonrandomizedpilottrial