Cargando…
A pilot study of machine-learning based automated planning for primary brain tumours
PURPOSE: High-quality radiotherapy (RT) planning for children and young adults with primary brain tumours is essential to minimize the risk of late treatment effects. The feasibility of using automated machine-learning (ML) to aid RT planning in this population has not previously been studied. METHO...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8734345/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34991634 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-021-01967-3 |
_version_ | 1784627998400446464 |
---|---|
author | Tsang, Derek S. Tsui, Grace McIntosh, Chris Purdie, Thomas Bauman, Glenn Dama, Hitesh Laperriere, Normand Millar, Barbara-Ann Shultz, David B. Ahmed, Sameera Khandwala, Mohammad Hodgson, David C. |
author_facet | Tsang, Derek S. Tsui, Grace McIntosh, Chris Purdie, Thomas Bauman, Glenn Dama, Hitesh Laperriere, Normand Millar, Barbara-Ann Shultz, David B. Ahmed, Sameera Khandwala, Mohammad Hodgson, David C. |
author_sort | Tsang, Derek S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: High-quality radiotherapy (RT) planning for children and young adults with primary brain tumours is essential to minimize the risk of late treatment effects. The feasibility of using automated machine-learning (ML) to aid RT planning in this population has not previously been studied. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We developed a ML model that identifies learned relationships between image features and expected dose in a training set of 95 patients with a primary brain tumour treated with focal radiotherapy to a dose of 54 Gy in 30 fractions. This ML method was then used to create predicted dose distributions for 15 previously-treated brain tumour patients across two institutions, as a testing set. Dosimetry to target volumes and organs-at-risk (OARs) were compared between the clinically-delivered (human-generated) plans versus the ML plans. RESULTS: The ML method was able to create deliverable plans in all 15 patients in the testing set. All ML plans were generated within 30 min of initiating planning. Planning target volume coverage with 95% of the prescription dose was attained in all plans. OAR doses were similar across most structures evaluated; mean doses to brain and left temporal lobe were lower in ML plans than manual plans (mean difference to left temporal, – 2.3 Gy, p = 0.006; mean differences to brain, – 1.3 Gy, p = 0.017), whereas mean doses to right cochlea and lenses were higher in ML plans (+ 1.6–2.2 Gy, p < 0.05 for each). CONCLUSIONS: Use of an automated ML method to aid RT planning for children and young adults with primary brain tumours is dosimetrically feasible and can be successfully used to create high-quality 54 Gy RT plans. Further evaluation after clinical implementation is planned. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13014-021-01967-3. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8734345 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87343452022-01-07 A pilot study of machine-learning based automated planning for primary brain tumours Tsang, Derek S. Tsui, Grace McIntosh, Chris Purdie, Thomas Bauman, Glenn Dama, Hitesh Laperriere, Normand Millar, Barbara-Ann Shultz, David B. Ahmed, Sameera Khandwala, Mohammad Hodgson, David C. Radiat Oncol Short Report PURPOSE: High-quality radiotherapy (RT) planning for children and young adults with primary brain tumours is essential to minimize the risk of late treatment effects. The feasibility of using automated machine-learning (ML) to aid RT planning in this population has not previously been studied. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We developed a ML model that identifies learned relationships between image features and expected dose in a training set of 95 patients with a primary brain tumour treated with focal radiotherapy to a dose of 54 Gy in 30 fractions. This ML method was then used to create predicted dose distributions for 15 previously-treated brain tumour patients across two institutions, as a testing set. Dosimetry to target volumes and organs-at-risk (OARs) were compared between the clinically-delivered (human-generated) plans versus the ML plans. RESULTS: The ML method was able to create deliverable plans in all 15 patients in the testing set. All ML plans were generated within 30 min of initiating planning. Planning target volume coverage with 95% of the prescription dose was attained in all plans. OAR doses were similar across most structures evaluated; mean doses to brain and left temporal lobe were lower in ML plans than manual plans (mean difference to left temporal, – 2.3 Gy, p = 0.006; mean differences to brain, – 1.3 Gy, p = 0.017), whereas mean doses to right cochlea and lenses were higher in ML plans (+ 1.6–2.2 Gy, p < 0.05 for each). CONCLUSIONS: Use of an automated ML method to aid RT planning for children and young adults with primary brain tumours is dosimetrically feasible and can be successfully used to create high-quality 54 Gy RT plans. Further evaluation after clinical implementation is planned. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13014-021-01967-3. BioMed Central 2022-01-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8734345/ /pubmed/34991634 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-021-01967-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Short Report Tsang, Derek S. Tsui, Grace McIntosh, Chris Purdie, Thomas Bauman, Glenn Dama, Hitesh Laperriere, Normand Millar, Barbara-Ann Shultz, David B. Ahmed, Sameera Khandwala, Mohammad Hodgson, David C. A pilot study of machine-learning based automated planning for primary brain tumours |
title | A pilot study of machine-learning based automated planning for primary brain tumours |
title_full | A pilot study of machine-learning based automated planning for primary brain tumours |
title_fullStr | A pilot study of machine-learning based automated planning for primary brain tumours |
title_full_unstemmed | A pilot study of machine-learning based automated planning for primary brain tumours |
title_short | A pilot study of machine-learning based automated planning for primary brain tumours |
title_sort | pilot study of machine-learning based automated planning for primary brain tumours |
topic | Short Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8734345/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34991634 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-021-01967-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tsangdereks apilotstudyofmachinelearningbasedautomatedplanningforprimarybraintumours AT tsuigrace apilotstudyofmachinelearningbasedautomatedplanningforprimarybraintumours AT mcintoshchris apilotstudyofmachinelearningbasedautomatedplanningforprimarybraintumours AT purdiethomas apilotstudyofmachinelearningbasedautomatedplanningforprimarybraintumours AT baumanglenn apilotstudyofmachinelearningbasedautomatedplanningforprimarybraintumours AT damahitesh apilotstudyofmachinelearningbasedautomatedplanningforprimarybraintumours AT laperrierenormand apilotstudyofmachinelearningbasedautomatedplanningforprimarybraintumours AT millarbarbaraann apilotstudyofmachinelearningbasedautomatedplanningforprimarybraintumours AT shultzdavidb apilotstudyofmachinelearningbasedautomatedplanningforprimarybraintumours AT ahmedsameera apilotstudyofmachinelearningbasedautomatedplanningforprimarybraintumours AT khandwalamohammad apilotstudyofmachinelearningbasedautomatedplanningforprimarybraintumours AT hodgsondavidc apilotstudyofmachinelearningbasedautomatedplanningforprimarybraintumours AT tsangdereks pilotstudyofmachinelearningbasedautomatedplanningforprimarybraintumours AT tsuigrace pilotstudyofmachinelearningbasedautomatedplanningforprimarybraintumours AT mcintoshchris pilotstudyofmachinelearningbasedautomatedplanningforprimarybraintumours AT purdiethomas pilotstudyofmachinelearningbasedautomatedplanningforprimarybraintumours AT baumanglenn pilotstudyofmachinelearningbasedautomatedplanningforprimarybraintumours AT damahitesh pilotstudyofmachinelearningbasedautomatedplanningforprimarybraintumours AT laperrierenormand pilotstudyofmachinelearningbasedautomatedplanningforprimarybraintumours AT millarbarbaraann pilotstudyofmachinelearningbasedautomatedplanningforprimarybraintumours AT shultzdavidb pilotstudyofmachinelearningbasedautomatedplanningforprimarybraintumours AT ahmedsameera pilotstudyofmachinelearningbasedautomatedplanningforprimarybraintumours AT khandwalamohammad pilotstudyofmachinelearningbasedautomatedplanningforprimarybraintumours AT hodgsondavidc pilotstudyofmachinelearningbasedautomatedplanningforprimarybraintumours |