Cargando…
Diagnostic Performance of Diffusion MRI for differentiating Benign and Malignant Nonfatty Musculoskeletal Soft Tissue Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of standard diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM), and diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI), for differentiating benign and malignant soft tissue tumors (STTs). Materials and methods: A thorough search was carried out to i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Ivyspring International Publisher
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8734420/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35003360 http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.62131 |
_version_ | 1784628016648814592 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Qian Xiao, Xinguang Liang, Yanchang Wen, Hao Wen, Xiaopeng Gu, Meilan Ren, Cuiping Li, Kunbin Yu, Liangwen Lu, Liming |
author_facet | Wang, Qian Xiao, Xinguang Liang, Yanchang Wen, Hao Wen, Xiaopeng Gu, Meilan Ren, Cuiping Li, Kunbin Yu, Liangwen Lu, Liming |
author_sort | Wang, Qian |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of standard diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM), and diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI), for differentiating benign and malignant soft tissue tumors (STTs). Materials and methods: A thorough search was carried out to identify suitable studies published up to September 2020. The quality of the studies involved was evaluated using Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2). The pooled sensitivity (SEN), specificity (SPE), and summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve were calculated using bivariate mixed effects models. A subgroup analysis was also performed to explore the heterogeneity. Results: Eighteen studies investigating 1319 patients with musculoskeletal STTs (malignant, n=623; benign, n=696) were enrolled. Thirteen standard DWI studies using the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) showed that the pooled SEN and SPE of ADC were 0.80 (95% CI: 0.77-0.82) and 0.63 (95% CI: 0.60-0.67), respectively. The area under the curve (AUC) calculated from the SROC curve was 0.806. The subgroup analysis indicated that the percentage of myxoid malignant tumors, magnet strength, study design, and ROI placement were significant factors affecting heterogeneity. Four IVIM studies showed that the AUCs calculated from the SROC curves of the parameters ADC and D were 0.859 and 0.874, respectively. The AUCs for the IVIM parameters pseudo diffusion coefficient (D*) and perfusion fraction (f) calculated from the SROC curve were 0.736 and 0.573, respectively. Two DKI studies showed that the AUCs of the DKI parameter mean kurtosis (MK) were 0.97 and 0.89, respectively. Conclusion: The DWI-derived ADC value and the IVIM DWI-derived D value might be accurate tools for discriminating musculoskeletal STTs, especially for non-myxoid SSTs, using more than two b values, with maximal b value ranging from 600 to 800 s/mm(2), additionally, a high-field strength (3.0 T) optimizes the diagnostic performance. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8734420 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Ivyspring International Publisher |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87344202022-01-06 Diagnostic Performance of Diffusion MRI for differentiating Benign and Malignant Nonfatty Musculoskeletal Soft Tissue Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Wang, Qian Xiao, Xinguang Liang, Yanchang Wen, Hao Wen, Xiaopeng Gu, Meilan Ren, Cuiping Li, Kunbin Yu, Liangwen Lu, Liming J Cancer Research Paper Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of standard diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM), and diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI), for differentiating benign and malignant soft tissue tumors (STTs). Materials and methods: A thorough search was carried out to identify suitable studies published up to September 2020. The quality of the studies involved was evaluated using Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2). The pooled sensitivity (SEN), specificity (SPE), and summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve were calculated using bivariate mixed effects models. A subgroup analysis was also performed to explore the heterogeneity. Results: Eighteen studies investigating 1319 patients with musculoskeletal STTs (malignant, n=623; benign, n=696) were enrolled. Thirteen standard DWI studies using the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) showed that the pooled SEN and SPE of ADC were 0.80 (95% CI: 0.77-0.82) and 0.63 (95% CI: 0.60-0.67), respectively. The area under the curve (AUC) calculated from the SROC curve was 0.806. The subgroup analysis indicated that the percentage of myxoid malignant tumors, magnet strength, study design, and ROI placement were significant factors affecting heterogeneity. Four IVIM studies showed that the AUCs calculated from the SROC curves of the parameters ADC and D were 0.859 and 0.874, respectively. The AUCs for the IVIM parameters pseudo diffusion coefficient (D*) and perfusion fraction (f) calculated from the SROC curve were 0.736 and 0.573, respectively. Two DKI studies showed that the AUCs of the DKI parameter mean kurtosis (MK) were 0.97 and 0.89, respectively. Conclusion: The DWI-derived ADC value and the IVIM DWI-derived D value might be accurate tools for discriminating musculoskeletal STTs, especially for non-myxoid SSTs, using more than two b values, with maximal b value ranging from 600 to 800 s/mm(2), additionally, a high-field strength (3.0 T) optimizes the diagnostic performance. Ivyspring International Publisher 2021-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8734420/ /pubmed/35003360 http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.62131 Text en © The author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). See http://ivyspring.com/terms for full terms and conditions. |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Wang, Qian Xiao, Xinguang Liang, Yanchang Wen, Hao Wen, Xiaopeng Gu, Meilan Ren, Cuiping Li, Kunbin Yu, Liangwen Lu, Liming Diagnostic Performance of Diffusion MRI for differentiating Benign and Malignant Nonfatty Musculoskeletal Soft Tissue Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title | Diagnostic Performance of Diffusion MRI for differentiating Benign and Malignant Nonfatty Musculoskeletal Soft Tissue Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title_full | Diagnostic Performance of Diffusion MRI for differentiating Benign and Malignant Nonfatty Musculoskeletal Soft Tissue Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Diagnostic Performance of Diffusion MRI for differentiating Benign and Malignant Nonfatty Musculoskeletal Soft Tissue Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Diagnostic Performance of Diffusion MRI for differentiating Benign and Malignant Nonfatty Musculoskeletal Soft Tissue Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title_short | Diagnostic Performance of Diffusion MRI for differentiating Benign and Malignant Nonfatty Musculoskeletal Soft Tissue Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title_sort | diagnostic performance of diffusion mri for differentiating benign and malignant nonfatty musculoskeletal soft tissue tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8734420/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35003360 http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.62131 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangqian diagnosticperformanceofdiffusionmrifordifferentiatingbenignandmalignantnonfattymusculoskeletalsofttissuetumorsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT xiaoxinguang diagnosticperformanceofdiffusionmrifordifferentiatingbenignandmalignantnonfattymusculoskeletalsofttissuetumorsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT liangyanchang diagnosticperformanceofdiffusionmrifordifferentiatingbenignandmalignantnonfattymusculoskeletalsofttissuetumorsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wenhao diagnosticperformanceofdiffusionmrifordifferentiatingbenignandmalignantnonfattymusculoskeletalsofttissuetumorsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wenxiaopeng diagnosticperformanceofdiffusionmrifordifferentiatingbenignandmalignantnonfattymusculoskeletalsofttissuetumorsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT gumeilan diagnosticperformanceofdiffusionmrifordifferentiatingbenignandmalignantnonfattymusculoskeletalsofttissuetumorsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT rencuiping diagnosticperformanceofdiffusionmrifordifferentiatingbenignandmalignantnonfattymusculoskeletalsofttissuetumorsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT likunbin diagnosticperformanceofdiffusionmrifordifferentiatingbenignandmalignantnonfattymusculoskeletalsofttissuetumorsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT yuliangwen diagnosticperformanceofdiffusionmrifordifferentiatingbenignandmalignantnonfattymusculoskeletalsofttissuetumorsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT luliming diagnosticperformanceofdiffusionmrifordifferentiatingbenignandmalignantnonfattymusculoskeletalsofttissuetumorsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |