Cargando…
Contamination of personal protective equipment during COVID-19 autopsies
Confronted with an emerging infectious disease at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, the medical community faced concerns regarding the safety of autopsies on those who died of the disease. This attitude has changed, and autopsies are now recognized as indispensable tools for understanding COVI...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8735722/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34993593 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00428-021-03263-7 |
_version_ | 1784628301544816640 |
---|---|
author | Brandner, Johanna M. Boor, Peter Borcherding, Lukas Edler, Carolin Gerber, Sven Heinemann, Axel Hilsenbeck, Julia Kasajima, Atsuko Lohner, Larissa Märkl, Bruno Pablik, Jessica Schröder, Ann Sophie Slotta-Huspenina, Julia Sommer, Linna Sperhake, Jan-Peter von Stillfried, Saskia Dintner, Sebastian |
author_facet | Brandner, Johanna M. Boor, Peter Borcherding, Lukas Edler, Carolin Gerber, Sven Heinemann, Axel Hilsenbeck, Julia Kasajima, Atsuko Lohner, Larissa Märkl, Bruno Pablik, Jessica Schröder, Ann Sophie Slotta-Huspenina, Julia Sommer, Linna Sperhake, Jan-Peter von Stillfried, Saskia Dintner, Sebastian |
author_sort | Brandner, Johanna M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Confronted with an emerging infectious disease at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, the medical community faced concerns regarding the safety of autopsies on those who died of the disease. This attitude has changed, and autopsies are now recognized as indispensable tools for understanding COVID-19, but the true risk of infection to autopsy staff is nevertheless still debated. To clarify the rate of SARS-CoV-2 contamination in personal protective equipment (PPE), swabs were taken at nine points in the PPE of one physician and one assistant after each of 11 full autopsies performed at four centers. Swabs were also obtained from three minimally invasive autopsies (MIAs) conducted at a fifth center. Lung/bronchus swabs of the deceased served as positive controls, and SARS-CoV-2 RNA was detected by real-time RT-PCR. In 9 of 11 full autopsies, PPE samples tested RNA positive through PCR, accounting for 41 of the 198 PPE samples taken (21%). The main contaminated items of the PPE were gloves (64% positive), aprons (50% positive), and the tops of shoes (36% positive) while the fronts of safety goggles, for example, were positive in only 4.5% of the samples, and all the face masks were negative. In MIAs, viral RNA was observed in one sample from a glove but not in other swabs. Infectious virus isolation in cell culture was performed on RNA-positive swabs from the full autopsies. Of all the RNA-positive PPE samples, 21% of the glove samples, taken in 3 of 11 full autopsies, tested positive for infectious virus. In conclusion, PPE was contaminated with viral RNA in 82% of autopsies. In 27% of autopsies, PPE was found to be contaminated even with infectious virus, representing a potential risk of infection to autopsy staff. Adequate PPE and hygiene measures, including appropriate waste deposition, are therefore essential to ensure a safe work environment. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00428-021-03263-7. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8735722 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87357222022-01-07 Contamination of personal protective equipment during COVID-19 autopsies Brandner, Johanna M. Boor, Peter Borcherding, Lukas Edler, Carolin Gerber, Sven Heinemann, Axel Hilsenbeck, Julia Kasajima, Atsuko Lohner, Larissa Märkl, Bruno Pablik, Jessica Schröder, Ann Sophie Slotta-Huspenina, Julia Sommer, Linna Sperhake, Jan-Peter von Stillfried, Saskia Dintner, Sebastian Virchows Arch Original Article Confronted with an emerging infectious disease at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, the medical community faced concerns regarding the safety of autopsies on those who died of the disease. This attitude has changed, and autopsies are now recognized as indispensable tools for understanding COVID-19, but the true risk of infection to autopsy staff is nevertheless still debated. To clarify the rate of SARS-CoV-2 contamination in personal protective equipment (PPE), swabs were taken at nine points in the PPE of one physician and one assistant after each of 11 full autopsies performed at four centers. Swabs were also obtained from three minimally invasive autopsies (MIAs) conducted at a fifth center. Lung/bronchus swabs of the deceased served as positive controls, and SARS-CoV-2 RNA was detected by real-time RT-PCR. In 9 of 11 full autopsies, PPE samples tested RNA positive through PCR, accounting for 41 of the 198 PPE samples taken (21%). The main contaminated items of the PPE were gloves (64% positive), aprons (50% positive), and the tops of shoes (36% positive) while the fronts of safety goggles, for example, were positive in only 4.5% of the samples, and all the face masks were negative. In MIAs, viral RNA was observed in one sample from a glove but not in other swabs. Infectious virus isolation in cell culture was performed on RNA-positive swabs from the full autopsies. Of all the RNA-positive PPE samples, 21% of the glove samples, taken in 3 of 11 full autopsies, tested positive for infectious virus. In conclusion, PPE was contaminated with viral RNA in 82% of autopsies. In 27% of autopsies, PPE was found to be contaminated even with infectious virus, representing a potential risk of infection to autopsy staff. Adequate PPE and hygiene measures, including appropriate waste deposition, are therefore essential to ensure a safe work environment. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00428-021-03263-7. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-01-06 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8735722/ /pubmed/34993593 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00428-021-03263-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Brandner, Johanna M. Boor, Peter Borcherding, Lukas Edler, Carolin Gerber, Sven Heinemann, Axel Hilsenbeck, Julia Kasajima, Atsuko Lohner, Larissa Märkl, Bruno Pablik, Jessica Schröder, Ann Sophie Slotta-Huspenina, Julia Sommer, Linna Sperhake, Jan-Peter von Stillfried, Saskia Dintner, Sebastian Contamination of personal protective equipment during COVID-19 autopsies |
title | Contamination of personal protective equipment during COVID-19 autopsies |
title_full | Contamination of personal protective equipment during COVID-19 autopsies |
title_fullStr | Contamination of personal protective equipment during COVID-19 autopsies |
title_full_unstemmed | Contamination of personal protective equipment during COVID-19 autopsies |
title_short | Contamination of personal protective equipment during COVID-19 autopsies |
title_sort | contamination of personal protective equipment during covid-19 autopsies |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8735722/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34993593 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00428-021-03263-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT brandnerjohannam contaminationofpersonalprotectiveequipmentduringcovid19autopsies AT boorpeter contaminationofpersonalprotectiveequipmentduringcovid19autopsies AT borcherdinglukas contaminationofpersonalprotectiveequipmentduringcovid19autopsies AT edlercarolin contaminationofpersonalprotectiveequipmentduringcovid19autopsies AT gerbersven contaminationofpersonalprotectiveequipmentduringcovid19autopsies AT heinemannaxel contaminationofpersonalprotectiveequipmentduringcovid19autopsies AT hilsenbeckjulia contaminationofpersonalprotectiveequipmentduringcovid19autopsies AT kasajimaatsuko contaminationofpersonalprotectiveequipmentduringcovid19autopsies AT lohnerlarissa contaminationofpersonalprotectiveequipmentduringcovid19autopsies AT marklbruno contaminationofpersonalprotectiveequipmentduringcovid19autopsies AT pablikjessica contaminationofpersonalprotectiveequipmentduringcovid19autopsies AT schroderannsophie contaminationofpersonalprotectiveequipmentduringcovid19autopsies AT slottahuspeninajulia contaminationofpersonalprotectiveequipmentduringcovid19autopsies AT sommerlinna contaminationofpersonalprotectiveequipmentduringcovid19autopsies AT sperhakejanpeter contaminationofpersonalprotectiveequipmentduringcovid19autopsies AT vonstillfriedsaskia contaminationofpersonalprotectiveequipmentduringcovid19autopsies AT dintnersebastian contaminationofpersonalprotectiveequipmentduringcovid19autopsies |