Cargando…
Mouse‐INtraDuctal (MIND): an in vivo model for studying the underlying mechanisms of DCIS malignancy
Due to widespread adoption of screening mammography, there has been a significant increase in new diagnoses of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). However, DCIS prognosis remains unclear. To address this gap, we developed an in vivo model, Mouse‐INtraDuctal (MIND), in which patient‐derived DCIS epithel...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8738143/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34714554 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/path.5820 |
_version_ | 1784628846616641536 |
---|---|
author | Hong, Yan Limback, Darlene Elsarraj, Hanan S Harper, Haleigh Haines, Haley Hansford, Hayley Ricci, Michael Kaufman, Carolyn Wedlock, Emily Xu, Mingchu Zhang, Jianhua May, Lisa Cusick, Therese Inciardi, Marc Redick, Mark Gatewood, Jason Winblad, Onalisa Aripoli, Allison Huppe, Ashley Balanoff, Christa Wagner, Jamie L Amin, Amanda L Larson, Kelsey E Ricci, Lawrence Tawfik, Ossama Razek, Hana Meierotto, Ruby O Madan, Rashna Godwin, Andrew K Thompson, Jeffrey Hilsenbeck, Susan G Futreal, Andy Thompson, Alastair Hwang, E Shelley Fan, Fang Behbod, Fariba |
author_facet | Hong, Yan Limback, Darlene Elsarraj, Hanan S Harper, Haleigh Haines, Haley Hansford, Hayley Ricci, Michael Kaufman, Carolyn Wedlock, Emily Xu, Mingchu Zhang, Jianhua May, Lisa Cusick, Therese Inciardi, Marc Redick, Mark Gatewood, Jason Winblad, Onalisa Aripoli, Allison Huppe, Ashley Balanoff, Christa Wagner, Jamie L Amin, Amanda L Larson, Kelsey E Ricci, Lawrence Tawfik, Ossama Razek, Hana Meierotto, Ruby O Madan, Rashna Godwin, Andrew K Thompson, Jeffrey Hilsenbeck, Susan G Futreal, Andy Thompson, Alastair Hwang, E Shelley Fan, Fang Behbod, Fariba |
author_sort | Hong, Yan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Due to widespread adoption of screening mammography, there has been a significant increase in new diagnoses of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). However, DCIS prognosis remains unclear. To address this gap, we developed an in vivo model, Mouse‐INtraDuctal (MIND), in which patient‐derived DCIS epithelial cells are injected intraductally and allowed to progress naturally in mice. Similar to human DCIS, the cancer cells formed in situ lesions inside the mouse mammary ducts and mimicked all histologic subtypes including micropapillary, papillary, cribriform, solid, and comedo. Among 37 patient samples injected into 202 xenografts, at median duration of 9 months, 20 samples (54%) injected into 95 xenografts showed in vivo invasive progression, while 17 (46%) samples injected into 107 xenografts remained non‐invasive. Among the 20 samples that showed invasive progression, nine samples injected into 54 xenografts exhibited a mixed pattern in which some xenografts showed invasive progression while others remained non‐invasive. Among the clinically relevant biomarkers, only elevated progesterone receptor expression in patient DCIS and the extent of in vivo growth in xenografts predicted an invasive outcome. The Tempus XT assay was used on 16 patient DCIS formalin‐fixed, paraffin‐embedded sections including eight DCISs that showed invasive progression, five DCISs that remained non‐invasive, and three DCISs that showed a mixed pattern in the xenografts. Analysis of the frequency of cancer‐related pathogenic mutations among the groups showed no significant differences (KW: p > 0.05). There were also no differences in the frequency of high, moderate, or low severity mutations (KW; p > 0.05). These results suggest that genetic changes in the DCIS are not the primary driver for the development of invasive disease. © 2021 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8738143 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87381432022-10-14 Mouse‐INtraDuctal (MIND): an in vivo model for studying the underlying mechanisms of DCIS malignancy Hong, Yan Limback, Darlene Elsarraj, Hanan S Harper, Haleigh Haines, Haley Hansford, Hayley Ricci, Michael Kaufman, Carolyn Wedlock, Emily Xu, Mingchu Zhang, Jianhua May, Lisa Cusick, Therese Inciardi, Marc Redick, Mark Gatewood, Jason Winblad, Onalisa Aripoli, Allison Huppe, Ashley Balanoff, Christa Wagner, Jamie L Amin, Amanda L Larson, Kelsey E Ricci, Lawrence Tawfik, Ossama Razek, Hana Meierotto, Ruby O Madan, Rashna Godwin, Andrew K Thompson, Jeffrey Hilsenbeck, Susan G Futreal, Andy Thompson, Alastair Hwang, E Shelley Fan, Fang Behbod, Fariba J Pathol Original Papers Due to widespread adoption of screening mammography, there has been a significant increase in new diagnoses of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). However, DCIS prognosis remains unclear. To address this gap, we developed an in vivo model, Mouse‐INtraDuctal (MIND), in which patient‐derived DCIS epithelial cells are injected intraductally and allowed to progress naturally in mice. Similar to human DCIS, the cancer cells formed in situ lesions inside the mouse mammary ducts and mimicked all histologic subtypes including micropapillary, papillary, cribriform, solid, and comedo. Among 37 patient samples injected into 202 xenografts, at median duration of 9 months, 20 samples (54%) injected into 95 xenografts showed in vivo invasive progression, while 17 (46%) samples injected into 107 xenografts remained non‐invasive. Among the 20 samples that showed invasive progression, nine samples injected into 54 xenografts exhibited a mixed pattern in which some xenografts showed invasive progression while others remained non‐invasive. Among the clinically relevant biomarkers, only elevated progesterone receptor expression in patient DCIS and the extent of in vivo growth in xenografts predicted an invasive outcome. The Tempus XT assay was used on 16 patient DCIS formalin‐fixed, paraffin‐embedded sections including eight DCISs that showed invasive progression, five DCISs that remained non‐invasive, and three DCISs that showed a mixed pattern in the xenografts. Analysis of the frequency of cancer‐related pathogenic mutations among the groups showed no significant differences (KW: p > 0.05). There were also no differences in the frequency of high, moderate, or low severity mutations (KW; p > 0.05). These results suggest that genetic changes in the DCIS are not the primary driver for the development of invasive disease. © 2021 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2021-12-13 2022-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8738143/ /pubmed/34714554 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/path.5820 Text en © 2021 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Papers Hong, Yan Limback, Darlene Elsarraj, Hanan S Harper, Haleigh Haines, Haley Hansford, Hayley Ricci, Michael Kaufman, Carolyn Wedlock, Emily Xu, Mingchu Zhang, Jianhua May, Lisa Cusick, Therese Inciardi, Marc Redick, Mark Gatewood, Jason Winblad, Onalisa Aripoli, Allison Huppe, Ashley Balanoff, Christa Wagner, Jamie L Amin, Amanda L Larson, Kelsey E Ricci, Lawrence Tawfik, Ossama Razek, Hana Meierotto, Ruby O Madan, Rashna Godwin, Andrew K Thompson, Jeffrey Hilsenbeck, Susan G Futreal, Andy Thompson, Alastair Hwang, E Shelley Fan, Fang Behbod, Fariba Mouse‐INtraDuctal (MIND): an in vivo model for studying the underlying mechanisms of DCIS malignancy |
title |
Mouse‐INtraDuctal (MIND): an in vivo model for studying the underlying mechanisms of DCIS malignancy |
title_full |
Mouse‐INtraDuctal (MIND): an in vivo model for studying the underlying mechanisms of DCIS malignancy |
title_fullStr |
Mouse‐INtraDuctal (MIND): an in vivo model for studying the underlying mechanisms of DCIS malignancy |
title_full_unstemmed |
Mouse‐INtraDuctal (MIND): an in vivo model for studying the underlying mechanisms of DCIS malignancy |
title_short |
Mouse‐INtraDuctal (MIND): an in vivo model for studying the underlying mechanisms of DCIS malignancy |
title_sort | mouse‐intraductal (mind): an in vivo model for studying the underlying mechanisms of dcis malignancy |
topic | Original Papers |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8738143/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34714554 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/path.5820 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hongyan mouseintraductalmindaninvivomodelforstudyingtheunderlyingmechanismsofdcismalignancy AT limbackdarlene mouseintraductalmindaninvivomodelforstudyingtheunderlyingmechanismsofdcismalignancy AT elsarrajhanans mouseintraductalmindaninvivomodelforstudyingtheunderlyingmechanismsofdcismalignancy AT harperhaleigh mouseintraductalmindaninvivomodelforstudyingtheunderlyingmechanismsofdcismalignancy AT haineshaley mouseintraductalmindaninvivomodelforstudyingtheunderlyingmechanismsofdcismalignancy AT hansfordhayley mouseintraductalmindaninvivomodelforstudyingtheunderlyingmechanismsofdcismalignancy AT riccimichael mouseintraductalmindaninvivomodelforstudyingtheunderlyingmechanismsofdcismalignancy AT kaufmancarolyn mouseintraductalmindaninvivomodelforstudyingtheunderlyingmechanismsofdcismalignancy AT wedlockemily mouseintraductalmindaninvivomodelforstudyingtheunderlyingmechanismsofdcismalignancy AT xumingchu mouseintraductalmindaninvivomodelforstudyingtheunderlyingmechanismsofdcismalignancy AT zhangjianhua mouseintraductalmindaninvivomodelforstudyingtheunderlyingmechanismsofdcismalignancy AT maylisa mouseintraductalmindaninvivomodelforstudyingtheunderlyingmechanismsofdcismalignancy AT cusicktherese mouseintraductalmindaninvivomodelforstudyingtheunderlyingmechanismsofdcismalignancy AT inciardimarc mouseintraductalmindaninvivomodelforstudyingtheunderlyingmechanismsofdcismalignancy AT redickmark mouseintraductalmindaninvivomodelforstudyingtheunderlyingmechanismsofdcismalignancy AT gatewoodjason mouseintraductalmindaninvivomodelforstudyingtheunderlyingmechanismsofdcismalignancy AT winbladonalisa mouseintraductalmindaninvivomodelforstudyingtheunderlyingmechanismsofdcismalignancy AT aripoliallison mouseintraductalmindaninvivomodelforstudyingtheunderlyingmechanismsofdcismalignancy AT huppeashley mouseintraductalmindaninvivomodelforstudyingtheunderlyingmechanismsofdcismalignancy AT balanoffchrista mouseintraductalmindaninvivomodelforstudyingtheunderlyingmechanismsofdcismalignancy AT wagnerjamiel mouseintraductalmindaninvivomodelforstudyingtheunderlyingmechanismsofdcismalignancy AT aminamandal mouseintraductalmindaninvivomodelforstudyingtheunderlyingmechanismsofdcismalignancy AT larsonkelseye mouseintraductalmindaninvivomodelforstudyingtheunderlyingmechanismsofdcismalignancy AT riccilawrence mouseintraductalmindaninvivomodelforstudyingtheunderlyingmechanismsofdcismalignancy AT tawfikossama mouseintraductalmindaninvivomodelforstudyingtheunderlyingmechanismsofdcismalignancy AT razekhana mouseintraductalmindaninvivomodelforstudyingtheunderlyingmechanismsofdcismalignancy AT meierottorubyo mouseintraductalmindaninvivomodelforstudyingtheunderlyingmechanismsofdcismalignancy AT madanrashna mouseintraductalmindaninvivomodelforstudyingtheunderlyingmechanismsofdcismalignancy AT godwinandrewk mouseintraductalmindaninvivomodelforstudyingtheunderlyingmechanismsofdcismalignancy AT thompsonjeffrey mouseintraductalmindaninvivomodelforstudyingtheunderlyingmechanismsofdcismalignancy AT hilsenbecksusang mouseintraductalmindaninvivomodelforstudyingtheunderlyingmechanismsofdcismalignancy AT futrealandy mouseintraductalmindaninvivomodelforstudyingtheunderlyingmechanismsofdcismalignancy AT thompsonalastair mouseintraductalmindaninvivomodelforstudyingtheunderlyingmechanismsofdcismalignancy AT hwangeshelley mouseintraductalmindaninvivomodelforstudyingtheunderlyingmechanismsofdcismalignancy AT fanfang mouseintraductalmindaninvivomodelforstudyingtheunderlyingmechanismsofdcismalignancy AT behbodfariba mouseintraductalmindaninvivomodelforstudyingtheunderlyingmechanismsofdcismalignancy AT mouseintraductalmindaninvivomodelforstudyingtheunderlyingmechanismsofdcismalignancy |