Cargando…

Differential Prognostic Implications of Pre- and Post-Stent Fractional Flow Reserve in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The influence of pre-intervention coronary physiologic status on outcomes post percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is not well known. We sought to investigate the prognostic implications of pre-PCI fractional flow reserve (FFR) combined with post-PCI FFR. METHODS: A t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Jinlong, Hwang, Doyeon, Yang, Seokhun, Kim, Chee Hae, Lee, Joo Myung, Nam, Chang-Wook, Shin, Eun-Seok, Doh, Joon-Hyung, Hoshino, Masahiro, Hamaya, Rikuta, Kanaji, Yoshihisa, Murai, Tadashi, Zhang, Jun-Jie, Ye, Fei, Li, Xiaobo, Ge, Zhen, Chen, Shao-Liang, Kakuta, Tsunekazu, Koo, Bon-Kwon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Society of Cardiology 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8738713/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34877828
http://dx.doi.org/10.4070/kcj.2021.0128
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The influence of pre-intervention coronary physiologic status on outcomes post percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is not well known. We sought to investigate the prognostic implications of pre-PCI fractional flow reserve (FFR) combined with post-PCI FFR. METHODS: A total of 1,479 PCI patients with pre-and post-PCI FFR data were analyzed. The patients were classified according to the median values of pre-PCI FFR (0.71) and post-PCI FFR (0.88). The primary outcome was target vessel failure (TVF) at 2 years. RESULTS: The risk of TVF was higher in the low pre-PCI FFR group than in the high pre-PCI FFR group (hazard ratio, 1.82; 95% confidence interval, 1.15–2.87; p=0.011). In 4 group comparisons, the cumulative incidences of TVF at 2 years were 3.8%, 4.1%, 4.8%, and 10.2% in the high pre-/high post-, low pre-/high post-, high pre-/low post-, and low pre-/low post-PCI FFR groups, respectively. The risk of TVF was the highest in the low pre-/low post-PCI FFR group among the groups (p values for comparisons <0.05). In addition, the high pre-/low post-PCI FFR group presented a comparable risk of TVF with the high post-PCI FFR groups (p values for comparison >0.05). When the prognostic value of the post-PCI FFR was evaluated according to the pre-PCI FFR, the risk of TVF significantly decreased with an increase in post-PCI FFR in the low pre-PCI FFR group, but not in the high pre-PCI FFR group. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-PCI FFR was associated with clinical outcomes after PCI, and the prognostic value of post-PCI FFR differed according to the pre-PCI FFR. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04012281