Cargando…

Optimizing large‐scale autologous human keratinocyte sheets for major burns—Toward an animal‐free production and a more accessible clinical application

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Autologous keratinocyte sheets constitute an important component of the burn wound treatment toolbox available to a surgeon and can be considered a life‐saving procedure for patients with severe burns over 50% of their total body surface area. Large‐scale keratinocyte sheet cult...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Frese, Laura, Darwiche, Salim Elias, Gunning, Myrna Elisabeth, Hoerstrup, Simon Philipp, von Rechenberg, Brigitte, Giovanoli, Pietro, Calcagni, Maurizio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8738975/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35028432
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.449
_version_ 1784629018906066944
author Frese, Laura
Darwiche, Salim Elias
Gunning, Myrna Elisabeth
Hoerstrup, Simon Philipp
von Rechenberg, Brigitte
Giovanoli, Pietro
Calcagni, Maurizio
author_facet Frese, Laura
Darwiche, Salim Elias
Gunning, Myrna Elisabeth
Hoerstrup, Simon Philipp
von Rechenberg, Brigitte
Giovanoli, Pietro
Calcagni, Maurizio
author_sort Frese, Laura
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Autologous keratinocyte sheets constitute an important component of the burn wound treatment toolbox available to a surgeon and can be considered a life‐saving procedure for patients with severe burns over 50% of their total body surface area. Large‐scale keratinocyte sheet cultivation still fundamentally relies on the use of animal components such as inactivated murine 3T3 fibroblasts as feeders, animal‐derived enzymes such as trypsin, as well as media components such as fetal bovine serum (FBS). This study was therefore aimed to optimize autologous keratinocyte sheets by comparing various alternatives to critical components in their production. METHODS: Human skin samples were retrieved from remnant operative tissues. Cell isolation efficiency and viability were investigated by comparing the efficacy of porcine‐derived trypsin and animal‐free enzymes (Accutase and TrypLESelect). The subsequent expansion of the cells and the keratinocyte sheet formation was analyzed, comparing various cell culture substrates (inactivated murine 3T3 fibroblasts, inactivated human fibroblasts, Collagen I or plain tissue culture plastic), as well as media containing serum or chemically defined animal‐free media. RESULTS: The cell isolation step showed clear cell yield advantages when using porcine‐derived trypsin, compared to animal‐free alternatives. The keratinocyte sheets produced using animal‐free serum were similar to those produced using 3T3 feeder layer and FBS‐containing medium, particularly in mechanical integrity as all grafts were liftable. In addition, sheets grown on collagen in an animal‐free medium showed indications of advantages in homogeneity, speed, reduced variability, and differentiation status compared to the other growth conditions investigated. Most importantly, the procedure was compatible with the up‐scaling requirements of major burn wound treatments. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that animal‐free components could be used successfully to reduce the risk profile of large‐scale autologous keratinocyte sheet production, and thereby increase clinical accessibility.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8738975
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87389752022-01-12 Optimizing large‐scale autologous human keratinocyte sheets for major burns—Toward an animal‐free production and a more accessible clinical application Frese, Laura Darwiche, Salim Elias Gunning, Myrna Elisabeth Hoerstrup, Simon Philipp von Rechenberg, Brigitte Giovanoli, Pietro Calcagni, Maurizio Health Sci Rep Research Articles BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Autologous keratinocyte sheets constitute an important component of the burn wound treatment toolbox available to a surgeon and can be considered a life‐saving procedure for patients with severe burns over 50% of their total body surface area. Large‐scale keratinocyte sheet cultivation still fundamentally relies on the use of animal components such as inactivated murine 3T3 fibroblasts as feeders, animal‐derived enzymes such as trypsin, as well as media components such as fetal bovine serum (FBS). This study was therefore aimed to optimize autologous keratinocyte sheets by comparing various alternatives to critical components in their production. METHODS: Human skin samples were retrieved from remnant operative tissues. Cell isolation efficiency and viability were investigated by comparing the efficacy of porcine‐derived trypsin and animal‐free enzymes (Accutase and TrypLESelect). The subsequent expansion of the cells and the keratinocyte sheet formation was analyzed, comparing various cell culture substrates (inactivated murine 3T3 fibroblasts, inactivated human fibroblasts, Collagen I or plain tissue culture plastic), as well as media containing serum or chemically defined animal‐free media. RESULTS: The cell isolation step showed clear cell yield advantages when using porcine‐derived trypsin, compared to animal‐free alternatives. The keratinocyte sheets produced using animal‐free serum were similar to those produced using 3T3 feeder layer and FBS‐containing medium, particularly in mechanical integrity as all grafts were liftable. In addition, sheets grown on collagen in an animal‐free medium showed indications of advantages in homogeneity, speed, reduced variability, and differentiation status compared to the other growth conditions investigated. Most importantly, the procedure was compatible with the up‐scaling requirements of major burn wound treatments. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that animal‐free components could be used successfully to reduce the risk profile of large‐scale autologous keratinocyte sheet production, and thereby increase clinical accessibility. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-01-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8738975/ /pubmed/35028432 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.449 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Health Science Reports published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Frese, Laura
Darwiche, Salim Elias
Gunning, Myrna Elisabeth
Hoerstrup, Simon Philipp
von Rechenberg, Brigitte
Giovanoli, Pietro
Calcagni, Maurizio
Optimizing large‐scale autologous human keratinocyte sheets for major burns—Toward an animal‐free production and a more accessible clinical application
title Optimizing large‐scale autologous human keratinocyte sheets for major burns—Toward an animal‐free production and a more accessible clinical application
title_full Optimizing large‐scale autologous human keratinocyte sheets for major burns—Toward an animal‐free production and a more accessible clinical application
title_fullStr Optimizing large‐scale autologous human keratinocyte sheets for major burns—Toward an animal‐free production and a more accessible clinical application
title_full_unstemmed Optimizing large‐scale autologous human keratinocyte sheets for major burns—Toward an animal‐free production and a more accessible clinical application
title_short Optimizing large‐scale autologous human keratinocyte sheets for major burns—Toward an animal‐free production and a more accessible clinical application
title_sort optimizing large‐scale autologous human keratinocyte sheets for major burns—toward an animal‐free production and a more accessible clinical application
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8738975/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35028432
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.449
work_keys_str_mv AT freselaura optimizinglargescaleautologoushumankeratinocytesheetsformajorburnstowardananimalfreeproductionandamoreaccessibleclinicalapplication
AT darwichesalimelias optimizinglargescaleautologoushumankeratinocytesheetsformajorburnstowardananimalfreeproductionandamoreaccessibleclinicalapplication
AT gunningmyrnaelisabeth optimizinglargescaleautologoushumankeratinocytesheetsformajorburnstowardananimalfreeproductionandamoreaccessibleclinicalapplication
AT hoerstrupsimonphilipp optimizinglargescaleautologoushumankeratinocytesheetsformajorburnstowardananimalfreeproductionandamoreaccessibleclinicalapplication
AT vonrechenbergbrigitte optimizinglargescaleautologoushumankeratinocytesheetsformajorburnstowardananimalfreeproductionandamoreaccessibleclinicalapplication
AT giovanolipietro optimizinglargescaleautologoushumankeratinocytesheetsformajorburnstowardananimalfreeproductionandamoreaccessibleclinicalapplication
AT calcagnimaurizio optimizinglargescaleautologoushumankeratinocytesheetsformajorburnstowardananimalfreeproductionandamoreaccessibleclinicalapplication