Cargando…

Evaluating the accuracy of three intraoral scanners using models containing different numbers of crown-prepared abutments

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: The scanning accuracy of intraoral scanners’ data collection plays a key role in the success of the final treatment. However, few studies start from scanning technology itself to directly evaluate it. The aim of this study was to evaluate the scanning accuracy of three intraoral...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Ting, Wei, Ting, Zhao, Yawen, Jiang, Mengyang, Yin, Xiaojie, Sun, Huiqiang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Association for Dental Sciences of the Republic of China 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8739236/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35028039
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2021.04.017
_version_ 1784629060280778752
author Zhang, Ting
Wei, Ting
Zhao, Yawen
Jiang, Mengyang
Yin, Xiaojie
Sun, Huiqiang
author_facet Zhang, Ting
Wei, Ting
Zhao, Yawen
Jiang, Mengyang
Yin, Xiaojie
Sun, Huiqiang
author_sort Zhang, Ting
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: The scanning accuracy of intraoral scanners’ data collection plays a key role in the success of the final treatment. However, few studies start from scanning technology itself to directly evaluate it. The aim of this study was to evaluate the scanning accuracy of three intraoral scanners, to provide a reference for relevant research and clinical applications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six types of resin models containing different numbers of crown-prepared abutments were three-dimensionally printed, and a model scanner, as well as three intraoral scanners, were used to digitally scan the six models. The obtained data were uploaded to three-dimensional reverse software for registration and comparison, and the accuracy of the models were analyzed. RESULTS: When scanning the six groups of models, the Omnicam outperformed both the TRIOS and iTero in terms of accuracy in all groups except the second molar group. The TRIOS and iTero scanners also exhibited decreased degrees of accuracy when scanning the long dental arch. The accuracy decreased as the scanning scope increased; however, the Omnicam scanner exhibited a relatively high degree of accuracy when scanning the three-unit fixed bridge and anterior areas. All scanners exhibited the lowest degree of accuracy when scanning the full-arch model. Certain deviations were observed, and the scanning areas at the incisal edges of the anterior teeth and end of the dental arch exhibited relatively large deviations. CONCLUSION: With the model scanner data as reference, the scanning accuracy of the three scanners exhibited differences and certain deviations, which were within clinical tolerance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8739236
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Association for Dental Sciences of the Republic of China
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87392362022-01-12 Evaluating the accuracy of three intraoral scanners using models containing different numbers of crown-prepared abutments Zhang, Ting Wei, Ting Zhao, Yawen Jiang, Mengyang Yin, Xiaojie Sun, Huiqiang J Dent Sci Original Article BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: The scanning accuracy of intraoral scanners’ data collection plays a key role in the success of the final treatment. However, few studies start from scanning technology itself to directly evaluate it. The aim of this study was to evaluate the scanning accuracy of three intraoral scanners, to provide a reference for relevant research and clinical applications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six types of resin models containing different numbers of crown-prepared abutments were three-dimensionally printed, and a model scanner, as well as three intraoral scanners, were used to digitally scan the six models. The obtained data were uploaded to three-dimensional reverse software for registration and comparison, and the accuracy of the models were analyzed. RESULTS: When scanning the six groups of models, the Omnicam outperformed both the TRIOS and iTero in terms of accuracy in all groups except the second molar group. The TRIOS and iTero scanners also exhibited decreased degrees of accuracy when scanning the long dental arch. The accuracy decreased as the scanning scope increased; however, the Omnicam scanner exhibited a relatively high degree of accuracy when scanning the three-unit fixed bridge and anterior areas. All scanners exhibited the lowest degree of accuracy when scanning the full-arch model. Certain deviations were observed, and the scanning areas at the incisal edges of the anterior teeth and end of the dental arch exhibited relatively large deviations. CONCLUSION: With the model scanner data as reference, the scanning accuracy of the three scanners exhibited differences and certain deviations, which were within clinical tolerance. Association for Dental Sciences of the Republic of China 2022-01 2021-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8739236/ /pubmed/35028039 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2021.04.017 Text en © 2021 Association for Dental Sciences of the Republic of China. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Zhang, Ting
Wei, Ting
Zhao, Yawen
Jiang, Mengyang
Yin, Xiaojie
Sun, Huiqiang
Evaluating the accuracy of three intraoral scanners using models containing different numbers of crown-prepared abutments
title Evaluating the accuracy of three intraoral scanners using models containing different numbers of crown-prepared abutments
title_full Evaluating the accuracy of three intraoral scanners using models containing different numbers of crown-prepared abutments
title_fullStr Evaluating the accuracy of three intraoral scanners using models containing different numbers of crown-prepared abutments
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the accuracy of three intraoral scanners using models containing different numbers of crown-prepared abutments
title_short Evaluating the accuracy of three intraoral scanners using models containing different numbers of crown-prepared abutments
title_sort evaluating the accuracy of three intraoral scanners using models containing different numbers of crown-prepared abutments
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8739236/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35028039
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2021.04.017
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangting evaluatingtheaccuracyofthreeintraoralscannersusingmodelscontainingdifferentnumbersofcrownpreparedabutments
AT weiting evaluatingtheaccuracyofthreeintraoralscannersusingmodelscontainingdifferentnumbersofcrownpreparedabutments
AT zhaoyawen evaluatingtheaccuracyofthreeintraoralscannersusingmodelscontainingdifferentnumbersofcrownpreparedabutments
AT jiangmengyang evaluatingtheaccuracyofthreeintraoralscannersusingmodelscontainingdifferentnumbersofcrownpreparedabutments
AT yinxiaojie evaluatingtheaccuracyofthreeintraoralscannersusingmodelscontainingdifferentnumbersofcrownpreparedabutments
AT sunhuiqiang evaluatingtheaccuracyofthreeintraoralscannersusingmodelscontainingdifferentnumbersofcrownpreparedabutments