Cargando…
Dealing with Discontinuity in Cancer Care Trajectories: Patients’ Solutions
INTRODUCTION: Patients with cancer require specialized care from different care providers, challenging continuity of care in terms of information, relationships, and/or management. The recognition of discontinuity of care has led to different initiatives by the healthcare system over the years. Yet,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8739302/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34169481 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40271-021-00535-x |
_version_ | 1784629074664095744 |
---|---|
author | Vermond, Debbie el Habhoubi, Souad de Groot, Esther Bronkhorst, Larike de Wit, Niek Zwart, Dorien |
author_facet | Vermond, Debbie el Habhoubi, Souad de Groot, Esther Bronkhorst, Larike de Wit, Niek Zwart, Dorien |
author_sort | Vermond, Debbie |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Patients with cancer require specialized care from different care providers, challenging continuity of care in terms of information, relationships, and/or management. The recognition of discontinuity of care has led to different initiatives by the healthcare system over the years. Yet, making use of the theory on boundary objects and brokers, this research explores the active role of patients themselves in resolving discontinuity along their care trajectories. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 33 patients to unravel the discontinuities that they experience and their attempts to resolve these. Interview data were analyzed using directed-content analysis informed by concepts from boundary crossing literature (i.e., data were searched for potential boundary objects and brokers). RESULTS: To re-establish continuity of care, patients actively use the objects and people provided by the healthcare system when these meet their needs. Patients also introduce own objects and people into the care trajectory. As such, information and management discontinuity can typically be resolved. Relational continuity appears to be more difficult to resolve, in some cases leaving patients to take drastic measures, such as changing care providers. DISCUSSION: The use of boundary crossing theory in improving care from a patient perspective is relatively novel. When patients and providers together address the objects and people that support establishing continuity of care, a continuous care process may be encouraged. We advocate an integrated approach, rather than provider or healthcare system initiatives exclusively, to patient care and continuity. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40271-021-00535-x. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8739302 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87393022022-01-20 Dealing with Discontinuity in Cancer Care Trajectories: Patients’ Solutions Vermond, Debbie el Habhoubi, Souad de Groot, Esther Bronkhorst, Larike de Wit, Niek Zwart, Dorien Patient Original Research Article INTRODUCTION: Patients with cancer require specialized care from different care providers, challenging continuity of care in terms of information, relationships, and/or management. The recognition of discontinuity of care has led to different initiatives by the healthcare system over the years. Yet, making use of the theory on boundary objects and brokers, this research explores the active role of patients themselves in resolving discontinuity along their care trajectories. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 33 patients to unravel the discontinuities that they experience and their attempts to resolve these. Interview data were analyzed using directed-content analysis informed by concepts from boundary crossing literature (i.e., data were searched for potential boundary objects and brokers). RESULTS: To re-establish continuity of care, patients actively use the objects and people provided by the healthcare system when these meet their needs. Patients also introduce own objects and people into the care trajectory. As such, information and management discontinuity can typically be resolved. Relational continuity appears to be more difficult to resolve, in some cases leaving patients to take drastic measures, such as changing care providers. DISCUSSION: The use of boundary crossing theory in improving care from a patient perspective is relatively novel. When patients and providers together address the objects and people that support establishing continuity of care, a continuous care process may be encouraged. We advocate an integrated approach, rather than provider or healthcare system initiatives exclusively, to patient care and continuity. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40271-021-00535-x. Springer International Publishing 2021-06-25 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8739302/ /pubmed/34169481 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40271-021-00535-x Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Research Article Vermond, Debbie el Habhoubi, Souad de Groot, Esther Bronkhorst, Larike de Wit, Niek Zwart, Dorien Dealing with Discontinuity in Cancer Care Trajectories: Patients’ Solutions |
title | Dealing with Discontinuity in Cancer Care Trajectories: Patients’ Solutions |
title_full | Dealing with Discontinuity in Cancer Care Trajectories: Patients’ Solutions |
title_fullStr | Dealing with Discontinuity in Cancer Care Trajectories: Patients’ Solutions |
title_full_unstemmed | Dealing with Discontinuity in Cancer Care Trajectories: Patients’ Solutions |
title_short | Dealing with Discontinuity in Cancer Care Trajectories: Patients’ Solutions |
title_sort | dealing with discontinuity in cancer care trajectories: patients’ solutions |
topic | Original Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8739302/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34169481 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40271-021-00535-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vermonddebbie dealingwithdiscontinuityincancercaretrajectoriespatientssolutions AT elhabhoubisouad dealingwithdiscontinuityincancercaretrajectoriespatientssolutions AT degrootesther dealingwithdiscontinuityincancercaretrajectoriespatientssolutions AT bronkhorstlarike dealingwithdiscontinuityincancercaretrajectoriespatientssolutions AT dewitniek dealingwithdiscontinuityincancercaretrajectoriespatientssolutions AT zwartdorien dealingwithdiscontinuityincancercaretrajectoriespatientssolutions |