Cargando…

Subcutaneous ICD implantation under ultrasound-guided serratus anterior plane block: Single-center experience in the Netherlands

INTRODUCTION: To avoid general anesthesia (GA) and improve postoperative pain management for subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) implantation there is a growing interest for alternative methods. We describe the first experience in the Netherlands of S-ICD implantation under U...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Elders, Jan, AlHashimi, Hisham, Gomes, Marc, Panhuizen, Ivo, van Kuijk, Sander, Vernooy, Kevin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8739453/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35028411
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcha.2021.100949
_version_ 1784629102084358144
author Elders, Jan
AlHashimi, Hisham
Gomes, Marc
Panhuizen, Ivo
van Kuijk, Sander
Vernooy, Kevin
author_facet Elders, Jan
AlHashimi, Hisham
Gomes, Marc
Panhuizen, Ivo
van Kuijk, Sander
Vernooy, Kevin
author_sort Elders, Jan
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: To avoid general anesthesia (GA) and improve postoperative pain management for subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) implantation there is a growing interest for alternative methods. We describe the first experience in the Netherlands of S-ICD implantation under Ultrasound-guided Serratus Anterior Plane Block (US-SAPB). METHODS: US-SAPB was performed 1 hour before S-ICD implantation. The two-incision technique was used and a pocket beneath the latissimus dorsi muscle was surgically created. Lidocaine was used to provide anesthesia of the skin. Sedation during defibrillation testing (DFT) was induced by intravenous Propofol. Periprocedural pain experience was monitored using the Numerical Rating Scale for Pain (NRS-Pain). The results were compared with a control group of patients undergoing S-ICD implantation under GA. RESULTS: Forty consecutive patients (29 Male/11 Female, median age 59 years (range 34–84 years), median body mass index 26 (range 17–41) underwent S-ICD implantation; Twenty patients under US-SAPB and twenty under GA. Median procedure time was 42 min. (range 28–60 min.) with no differences between both groups. In both groups implantations went successful and defibrillation was accomplished using 65 J. US-SAPB was successful in 19 of the 20 patients and GA was successful in all cases. Median NRS-Pain in the US-SAPB group was 2 (range 2–6) and in the GA group 4 (range 2–6). In the US-SAPB group 5 patients required additional opioids postoperatively compared to 10 patients in the GA group. CONCLUSIONS: S-ICD implantation under US-SAPB is feasible, safe and reduces the need for postoperative opioids significantly. S-ICD implantation under US-SAPB seems a good alternative for GA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8739453
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87394532022-01-12 Subcutaneous ICD implantation under ultrasound-guided serratus anterior plane block: Single-center experience in the Netherlands Elders, Jan AlHashimi, Hisham Gomes, Marc Panhuizen, Ivo van Kuijk, Sander Vernooy, Kevin Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc Original Paper INTRODUCTION: To avoid general anesthesia (GA) and improve postoperative pain management for subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) implantation there is a growing interest for alternative methods. We describe the first experience in the Netherlands of S-ICD implantation under Ultrasound-guided Serratus Anterior Plane Block (US-SAPB). METHODS: US-SAPB was performed 1 hour before S-ICD implantation. The two-incision technique was used and a pocket beneath the latissimus dorsi muscle was surgically created. Lidocaine was used to provide anesthesia of the skin. Sedation during defibrillation testing (DFT) was induced by intravenous Propofol. Periprocedural pain experience was monitored using the Numerical Rating Scale for Pain (NRS-Pain). The results were compared with a control group of patients undergoing S-ICD implantation under GA. RESULTS: Forty consecutive patients (29 Male/11 Female, median age 59 years (range 34–84 years), median body mass index 26 (range 17–41) underwent S-ICD implantation; Twenty patients under US-SAPB and twenty under GA. Median procedure time was 42 min. (range 28–60 min.) with no differences between both groups. In both groups implantations went successful and defibrillation was accomplished using 65 J. US-SAPB was successful in 19 of the 20 patients and GA was successful in all cases. Median NRS-Pain in the US-SAPB group was 2 (range 2–6) and in the GA group 4 (range 2–6). In the US-SAPB group 5 patients required additional opioids postoperatively compared to 10 patients in the GA group. CONCLUSIONS: S-ICD implantation under US-SAPB is feasible, safe and reduces the need for postoperative opioids significantly. S-ICD implantation under US-SAPB seems a good alternative for GA. Elsevier 2022-01-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8739453/ /pubmed/35028411 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcha.2021.100949 Text en © 2021 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Paper
Elders, Jan
AlHashimi, Hisham
Gomes, Marc
Panhuizen, Ivo
van Kuijk, Sander
Vernooy, Kevin
Subcutaneous ICD implantation under ultrasound-guided serratus anterior plane block: Single-center experience in the Netherlands
title Subcutaneous ICD implantation under ultrasound-guided serratus anterior plane block: Single-center experience in the Netherlands
title_full Subcutaneous ICD implantation under ultrasound-guided serratus anterior plane block: Single-center experience in the Netherlands
title_fullStr Subcutaneous ICD implantation under ultrasound-guided serratus anterior plane block: Single-center experience in the Netherlands
title_full_unstemmed Subcutaneous ICD implantation under ultrasound-guided serratus anterior plane block: Single-center experience in the Netherlands
title_short Subcutaneous ICD implantation under ultrasound-guided serratus anterior plane block: Single-center experience in the Netherlands
title_sort subcutaneous icd implantation under ultrasound-guided serratus anterior plane block: single-center experience in the netherlands
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8739453/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35028411
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcha.2021.100949
work_keys_str_mv AT eldersjan subcutaneousicdimplantationunderultrasoundguidedserratusanteriorplaneblocksinglecenterexperienceinthenetherlands
AT alhashimihisham subcutaneousicdimplantationunderultrasoundguidedserratusanteriorplaneblocksinglecenterexperienceinthenetherlands
AT gomesmarc subcutaneousicdimplantationunderultrasoundguidedserratusanteriorplaneblocksinglecenterexperienceinthenetherlands
AT panhuizenivo subcutaneousicdimplantationunderultrasoundguidedserratusanteriorplaneblocksinglecenterexperienceinthenetherlands
AT vankuijksander subcutaneousicdimplantationunderultrasoundguidedserratusanteriorplaneblocksinglecenterexperienceinthenetherlands
AT vernooykevin subcutaneousicdimplantationunderultrasoundguidedserratusanteriorplaneblocksinglecenterexperienceinthenetherlands