Cargando…
Quality and Safety Outcomes of a Hospital Merger Following a Full Integration at a Safety Net Hospital
IMPORTANCE: Hospital consolidations have been shown not to improve quality on average. OBJECTIVE: To assess a full-integration approach to hospital mergers based on quality metrics in a safety net hospital acquired by an urban academic health system. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This quality i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Medical Association
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8739764/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34989794 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.42382 |
Sumario: | IMPORTANCE: Hospital consolidations have been shown not to improve quality on average. OBJECTIVE: To assess a full-integration approach to hospital mergers based on quality metrics in a safety net hospital acquired by an urban academic health system. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This quality improvement study analyzed outcomes for all nonpsychiatric, nonrehabilitation, non-newborn patients discharged between September 1, 2010, and August 31, 2019, at a US safety net hospital that was acquired by an urban academic health system in January 2016. Interrupted time series and statistical process control analyses were used to assess the main outcomes and measures. Data sources included the hospital’s electronic health record, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Hospital Compare, and nursing quality reports. EXPOSURES: A full-integration approach to the merger that included: (1) early administrative and clinical leadership integration with the academic health system; (2) rapid transition to the academic health system electronic health record; (3) local ownership of quality metrics; (4) system-level goals with real-time actionable analytics through combined dashboards; and (5) implementation of value-based and other analytic-driven interventions. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included 30-day readmission, patient experience, and hospital-acquired conditions. RESULTS: The 122 348 patients in the premerger (September 2010 through August 2016) and the 58 904 patients in the postmerger (September 2016 through August 2019) periods had a mean (SD) age of 55.5 (22.0) years; the total sample of 181 252 patients included 112 191 women (61.9%), the payor mix was majority governmental (144 375 patients [79.7%]), and most admissions were emergent (121 469 patients [67.0%]). There was a 0.71% (95% CI, 0.57%-0.86%) absolute (27% relative) reduction in the crude mortality rate and 0.95% (95% CI, 0.83%-1.12%) absolute (33% relative) in the adjusted rate by the end of the 3-year intervention period. There was no significant improvement in readmission rates after accounting for baseline trends. There were fewer central line infections per 1000 catheter days, fewer catheter-associated urinary tract infections per 1000 discharges, and a higher likelihood of patients recommending the hospital or ranking it 9 or 10. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this quality improvement study, a hospital merger with a full-integration approach to consolidation was found to be associated with improvement in quality outcomes. |
---|