Cargando…

Case Report: Infusion-Related Reactions to Intravenous Infliximab and Subcutaneous Ustekinumab in Pediatric Crohn's Disease

Background: Although the biological agent ustekinumab (UST) is reported to be effective for Crohn's disease (CD) in pediatric as well as adult patients, data on the efficacy and safety of UST in pediatric patients with CD are limited. Here, we describe the case of a pediatric patient who showed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kakiuchi, Toshihiko, Kimura, Sakiko, Esaki, Motohiro, Matsuo, Muneaki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8739802/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35004530
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2021.670703
_version_ 1784629180771598336
author Kakiuchi, Toshihiko
Kimura, Sakiko
Esaki, Motohiro
Matsuo, Muneaki
author_facet Kakiuchi, Toshihiko
Kimura, Sakiko
Esaki, Motohiro
Matsuo, Muneaki
author_sort Kakiuchi, Toshihiko
collection PubMed
description Background: Although the biological agent ustekinumab (UST) is reported to be effective for Crohn's disease (CD) in pediatric as well as adult patients, data on the efficacy and safety of UST in pediatric patients with CD are limited. Here, we describe the case of a pediatric patient who showed an allergic reaction to UST after subcutaneous (SC) maintenance injections but not immediately after initial intravenous (IV) injection. Case Presentation: A 9-year-old boy presented to our hospital with diarrhea lasting 2 years and weight loss, leading to the diagnosis of CD. After prednisolone (PSL) was tapered and discontinued, he promptly relapsed. According to our institution's protocol, we introduced the biological agent infliximab (IFX) with premedication. Coughing and vomiting was observed after the second dose of IFX and it was changed to adalimumab (ADA). However, the effect of ADA gradually disappeared after 18 months; therefore, it was discontinued and he was treated using UST. The first IV UST dose was given after administering hydrocortisone (HDC), an antiallergic and antipyretic analgesic, as premedication, and no obvious adverse reaction was observed. After 8 weeks, UST was subcutaneously injected without premedication. The patient then complained of nausea, dizziness, and headache within 15 min of UST administration. Therefore, for the third dose of UST, HDC was administered again as premedication. However, nausea, dizziness, and headache presented 10 min after UST administration, resulting in discontinuation of further UST treatment. Conclusion: Careful distinction between “true” infusion-related reactions (IRRs) and anaphylaxis or allergic reactions is necessary to determine whether biological agents can be continued after the development of “so-called” IRRs. For true IRRs, it may be possible to continue using the biological agent with appropriate premedication; however, in cases of anaphylaxis, the biological agent itself should be changed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8739802
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87398022022-01-08 Case Report: Infusion-Related Reactions to Intravenous Infliximab and Subcutaneous Ustekinumab in Pediatric Crohn's Disease Kakiuchi, Toshihiko Kimura, Sakiko Esaki, Motohiro Matsuo, Muneaki Front Pediatr Pediatrics Background: Although the biological agent ustekinumab (UST) is reported to be effective for Crohn's disease (CD) in pediatric as well as adult patients, data on the efficacy and safety of UST in pediatric patients with CD are limited. Here, we describe the case of a pediatric patient who showed an allergic reaction to UST after subcutaneous (SC) maintenance injections but not immediately after initial intravenous (IV) injection. Case Presentation: A 9-year-old boy presented to our hospital with diarrhea lasting 2 years and weight loss, leading to the diagnosis of CD. After prednisolone (PSL) was tapered and discontinued, he promptly relapsed. According to our institution's protocol, we introduced the biological agent infliximab (IFX) with premedication. Coughing and vomiting was observed after the second dose of IFX and it was changed to adalimumab (ADA). However, the effect of ADA gradually disappeared after 18 months; therefore, it was discontinued and he was treated using UST. The first IV UST dose was given after administering hydrocortisone (HDC), an antiallergic and antipyretic analgesic, as premedication, and no obvious adverse reaction was observed. After 8 weeks, UST was subcutaneously injected without premedication. The patient then complained of nausea, dizziness, and headache within 15 min of UST administration. Therefore, for the third dose of UST, HDC was administered again as premedication. However, nausea, dizziness, and headache presented 10 min after UST administration, resulting in discontinuation of further UST treatment. Conclusion: Careful distinction between “true” infusion-related reactions (IRRs) and anaphylaxis or allergic reactions is necessary to determine whether biological agents can be continued after the development of “so-called” IRRs. For true IRRs, it may be possible to continue using the biological agent with appropriate premedication; however, in cases of anaphylaxis, the biological agent itself should be changed. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-12-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8739802/ /pubmed/35004530 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2021.670703 Text en Copyright © 2021 Kakiuchi, Kimura, Esaki and Matsuo. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Pediatrics
Kakiuchi, Toshihiko
Kimura, Sakiko
Esaki, Motohiro
Matsuo, Muneaki
Case Report: Infusion-Related Reactions to Intravenous Infliximab and Subcutaneous Ustekinumab in Pediatric Crohn's Disease
title Case Report: Infusion-Related Reactions to Intravenous Infliximab and Subcutaneous Ustekinumab in Pediatric Crohn's Disease
title_full Case Report: Infusion-Related Reactions to Intravenous Infliximab and Subcutaneous Ustekinumab in Pediatric Crohn's Disease
title_fullStr Case Report: Infusion-Related Reactions to Intravenous Infliximab and Subcutaneous Ustekinumab in Pediatric Crohn's Disease
title_full_unstemmed Case Report: Infusion-Related Reactions to Intravenous Infliximab and Subcutaneous Ustekinumab in Pediatric Crohn's Disease
title_short Case Report: Infusion-Related Reactions to Intravenous Infliximab and Subcutaneous Ustekinumab in Pediatric Crohn's Disease
title_sort case report: infusion-related reactions to intravenous infliximab and subcutaneous ustekinumab in pediatric crohn's disease
topic Pediatrics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8739802/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35004530
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2021.670703
work_keys_str_mv AT kakiuchitoshihiko casereportinfusionrelatedreactionstointravenousinfliximabandsubcutaneousustekinumabinpediatriccrohnsdisease
AT kimurasakiko casereportinfusionrelatedreactionstointravenousinfliximabandsubcutaneousustekinumabinpediatriccrohnsdisease
AT esakimotohiro casereportinfusionrelatedreactionstointravenousinfliximabandsubcutaneousustekinumabinpediatriccrohnsdisease
AT matsuomuneaki casereportinfusionrelatedreactionstointravenousinfliximabandsubcutaneousustekinumabinpediatriccrohnsdisease