Cargando…

Evaluation of Differential Peptide Loading on Tandem Mass Tag-Based Proteomic and Phosphoproteomic Data Quality

[Image: see text] Global and phosphoproteome profiling has demonstrated great utility for the analysis of clinical specimens. One barrier to the broad clinical application of proteomic profiling is the large amount of biological material required, particularly for phosphoproteomics—currently on the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sanford, James A., Wang, Yang, Hansen, Joshua R., Gritsenko, Marina A., Weitz, Karl K., Sagendorf, Tyler J., Tognon, Cristina E., Petyuk, Vladislav A., Qian, Wei-Jun, Liu, Tao, Druker, Brian J., Rodland, Karin D., Piehowski, Paul D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2021
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8739833/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34813325
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jasms.1c00169
_version_ 1784629187163717632
author Sanford, James A.
Wang, Yang
Hansen, Joshua R.
Gritsenko, Marina A.
Weitz, Karl K.
Sagendorf, Tyler J.
Tognon, Cristina E.
Petyuk, Vladislav A.
Qian, Wei-Jun
Liu, Tao
Druker, Brian J.
Rodland, Karin D.
Piehowski, Paul D.
author_facet Sanford, James A.
Wang, Yang
Hansen, Joshua R.
Gritsenko, Marina A.
Weitz, Karl K.
Sagendorf, Tyler J.
Tognon, Cristina E.
Petyuk, Vladislav A.
Qian, Wei-Jun
Liu, Tao
Druker, Brian J.
Rodland, Karin D.
Piehowski, Paul D.
author_sort Sanford, James A.
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] Global and phosphoproteome profiling has demonstrated great utility for the analysis of clinical specimens. One barrier to the broad clinical application of proteomic profiling is the large amount of biological material required, particularly for phosphoproteomics—currently on the order of 25 mg wet tissue weight. For hematopoietic cancers such as acute myeloid leukemia (AML), the sample requirement is ≥10 million peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). Across large study cohorts, this requirement will exceed what is obtainable for many individual patients/time points. For this reason, we were interested in the impact of differential peptide loading across multiplex channels on proteomic data quality. To achieve this, we tested a range of channel loading amounts (approximately the material obtainable from 5E5, 1E6, 2.5E6, 5E6, and 1E7 AML patient cells) to assess proteome coverage, quantification precision, and peptide/phosphopeptide detection in experiments utilizing isobaric tandem mass tag (TMT) labeling. As expected, fewer missing values were observed in TMT channels with higher peptide loading amounts compared to lower loadings. Moreover, channels with a lower loading have greater quantitative variability than channels with higher loadings. A statistical analysis showed that decreased loading amounts result in an increase in the type I error rate. We then examined the impact of differential loading on the detection of known differences between distinct AML cell lines. Similar patterns of increased data missingness and higher quantitative variability were observed as loading was decreased resulting in fewer statistical differences; however, we found good agreement in features identified as differential, demonstrating the value of this approach.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8739833
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87398332022-01-10 Evaluation of Differential Peptide Loading on Tandem Mass Tag-Based Proteomic and Phosphoproteomic Data Quality Sanford, James A. Wang, Yang Hansen, Joshua R. Gritsenko, Marina A. Weitz, Karl K. Sagendorf, Tyler J. Tognon, Cristina E. Petyuk, Vladislav A. Qian, Wei-Jun Liu, Tao Druker, Brian J. Rodland, Karin D. Piehowski, Paul D. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom [Image: see text] Global and phosphoproteome profiling has demonstrated great utility for the analysis of clinical specimens. One barrier to the broad clinical application of proteomic profiling is the large amount of biological material required, particularly for phosphoproteomics—currently on the order of 25 mg wet tissue weight. For hematopoietic cancers such as acute myeloid leukemia (AML), the sample requirement is ≥10 million peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). Across large study cohorts, this requirement will exceed what is obtainable for many individual patients/time points. For this reason, we were interested in the impact of differential peptide loading across multiplex channels on proteomic data quality. To achieve this, we tested a range of channel loading amounts (approximately the material obtainable from 5E5, 1E6, 2.5E6, 5E6, and 1E7 AML patient cells) to assess proteome coverage, quantification precision, and peptide/phosphopeptide detection in experiments utilizing isobaric tandem mass tag (TMT) labeling. As expected, fewer missing values were observed in TMT channels with higher peptide loading amounts compared to lower loadings. Moreover, channels with a lower loading have greater quantitative variability than channels with higher loadings. A statistical analysis showed that decreased loading amounts result in an increase in the type I error rate. We then examined the impact of differential loading on the detection of known differences between distinct AML cell lines. Similar patterns of increased data missingness and higher quantitative variability were observed as loading was decreased resulting in fewer statistical differences; however, we found good agreement in features identified as differential, demonstrating the value of this approach. American Chemical Society 2021-11-23 2022-01-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8739833/ /pubmed/34813325 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jasms.1c00169 Text en © 2021 Battelle Memorial Institute. Published by American Chemical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Permits non-commercial access and re-use, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained; but does not permit creation of adaptations or other derivative works (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Sanford, James A.
Wang, Yang
Hansen, Joshua R.
Gritsenko, Marina A.
Weitz, Karl K.
Sagendorf, Tyler J.
Tognon, Cristina E.
Petyuk, Vladislav A.
Qian, Wei-Jun
Liu, Tao
Druker, Brian J.
Rodland, Karin D.
Piehowski, Paul D.
Evaluation of Differential Peptide Loading on Tandem Mass Tag-Based Proteomic and Phosphoproteomic Data Quality
title Evaluation of Differential Peptide Loading on Tandem Mass Tag-Based Proteomic and Phosphoproteomic Data Quality
title_full Evaluation of Differential Peptide Loading on Tandem Mass Tag-Based Proteomic and Phosphoproteomic Data Quality
title_fullStr Evaluation of Differential Peptide Loading on Tandem Mass Tag-Based Proteomic and Phosphoproteomic Data Quality
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Differential Peptide Loading on Tandem Mass Tag-Based Proteomic and Phosphoproteomic Data Quality
title_short Evaluation of Differential Peptide Loading on Tandem Mass Tag-Based Proteomic and Phosphoproteomic Data Quality
title_sort evaluation of differential peptide loading on tandem mass tag-based proteomic and phosphoproteomic data quality
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8739833/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34813325
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jasms.1c00169
work_keys_str_mv AT sanfordjamesa evaluationofdifferentialpeptideloadingontandemmasstagbasedproteomicandphosphoproteomicdataquality
AT wangyang evaluationofdifferentialpeptideloadingontandemmasstagbasedproteomicandphosphoproteomicdataquality
AT hansenjoshuar evaluationofdifferentialpeptideloadingontandemmasstagbasedproteomicandphosphoproteomicdataquality
AT gritsenkomarinaa evaluationofdifferentialpeptideloadingontandemmasstagbasedproteomicandphosphoproteomicdataquality
AT weitzkarlk evaluationofdifferentialpeptideloadingontandemmasstagbasedproteomicandphosphoproteomicdataquality
AT sagendorftylerj evaluationofdifferentialpeptideloadingontandemmasstagbasedproteomicandphosphoproteomicdataquality
AT tognoncristinae evaluationofdifferentialpeptideloadingontandemmasstagbasedproteomicandphosphoproteomicdataquality
AT petyukvladislava evaluationofdifferentialpeptideloadingontandemmasstagbasedproteomicandphosphoproteomicdataquality
AT qianweijun evaluationofdifferentialpeptideloadingontandemmasstagbasedproteomicandphosphoproteomicdataquality
AT liutao evaluationofdifferentialpeptideloadingontandemmasstagbasedproteomicandphosphoproteomicdataquality
AT drukerbrianj evaluationofdifferentialpeptideloadingontandemmasstagbasedproteomicandphosphoproteomicdataquality
AT rodlandkarind evaluationofdifferentialpeptideloadingontandemmasstagbasedproteomicandphosphoproteomicdataquality
AT piehowskipauld evaluationofdifferentialpeptideloadingontandemmasstagbasedproteomicandphosphoproteomicdataquality