Cargando…

A Postsurgical Prognostic Nomogram for Locally Advanced Rectosigmoid Cancer to Assist in Patient Selection for Adjuvant Chemotherapy

BACKGROUND: The perioperative treatment model for locally advanced rectosigmoid junction cancer (LARSC) has not been finalized; whether this model should refer to the treatment model for rectal cancer remains controversial. METHODS: We screened 10,188 patients with stage II/III rectosigmoid junction...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Chao, Zhao, Shutao, Wang, Xudong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8739949/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35004292
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.772482
_version_ 1784629209624215552
author Zhang, Chao
Zhao, Shutao
Wang, Xudong
author_facet Zhang, Chao
Zhao, Shutao
Wang, Xudong
author_sort Zhang, Chao
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The perioperative treatment model for locally advanced rectosigmoid junction cancer (LARSC) has not been finalized; whether this model should refer to the treatment model for rectal cancer remains controversial. METHODS: We screened 10,188 patients with stage II/III rectosigmoid junction adenocarcinoma who underwent surgery between 2004 and 2016 from the National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Among them, 4,960 did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy, while 5,228 did receive adjuvant chemotherapy. Propensity score matching was used to balance the two groups for confounding factors, and the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used for survival analysis. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used to identify independent prognostic factors and build a predictive nomogram of survival for LARSC. X-tile software was used to divide the patients into three groups (low, medium, and high) according to their risk scores. 726 patients in our hospital were included for external validation. RESULTS: LARSC patients did not show a benefit from neoadjuvant radiotherapy (P>0.05). After further excluding patients who received neoadjuvant radiotherapy, multivariate analysis found that age, grade, tumor size, T stage, and log odds of positive lymph nodes were independent prognostic factors for patients without adjuvant chemotherapy and were included in the nomogram. The C-index of the model was 0.690 (95% confidence interval: 0.668–0.712). We divided the patients into low, moderate, and high risk subgroups based on prediction scores of the nomogram. We found that adjuvant chemotherapy did not improve the prognosis of low risk patients, while moderate and high risk patients benefited from adjuvant therapy. External validation data found that moderate, and high risk patients also benefited from AT. CONCLUSION: Direct surgery plus adjuvant chemotherapy may be the best perioperative treatment for LARSC. Moreover, adjuvant chemotherapy is only recommended for moderate and high risk patients as it did not benefit low risk patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8739949
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87399492022-01-08 A Postsurgical Prognostic Nomogram for Locally Advanced Rectosigmoid Cancer to Assist in Patient Selection for Adjuvant Chemotherapy Zhang, Chao Zhao, Shutao Wang, Xudong Front Oncol Oncology BACKGROUND: The perioperative treatment model for locally advanced rectosigmoid junction cancer (LARSC) has not been finalized; whether this model should refer to the treatment model for rectal cancer remains controversial. METHODS: We screened 10,188 patients with stage II/III rectosigmoid junction adenocarcinoma who underwent surgery between 2004 and 2016 from the National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Among them, 4,960 did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy, while 5,228 did receive adjuvant chemotherapy. Propensity score matching was used to balance the two groups for confounding factors, and the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used for survival analysis. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used to identify independent prognostic factors and build a predictive nomogram of survival for LARSC. X-tile software was used to divide the patients into three groups (low, medium, and high) according to their risk scores. 726 patients in our hospital were included for external validation. RESULTS: LARSC patients did not show a benefit from neoadjuvant radiotherapy (P>0.05). After further excluding patients who received neoadjuvant radiotherapy, multivariate analysis found that age, grade, tumor size, T stage, and log odds of positive lymph nodes were independent prognostic factors for patients without adjuvant chemotherapy and were included in the nomogram. The C-index of the model was 0.690 (95% confidence interval: 0.668–0.712). We divided the patients into low, moderate, and high risk subgroups based on prediction scores of the nomogram. We found that adjuvant chemotherapy did not improve the prognosis of low risk patients, while moderate and high risk patients benefited from adjuvant therapy. External validation data found that moderate, and high risk patients also benefited from AT. CONCLUSION: Direct surgery plus adjuvant chemotherapy may be the best perioperative treatment for LARSC. Moreover, adjuvant chemotherapy is only recommended for moderate and high risk patients as it did not benefit low risk patients. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-12-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8739949/ /pubmed/35004292 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.772482 Text en Copyright © 2021 Zhang, Zhao and Wang https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Zhang, Chao
Zhao, Shutao
Wang, Xudong
A Postsurgical Prognostic Nomogram for Locally Advanced Rectosigmoid Cancer to Assist in Patient Selection for Adjuvant Chemotherapy
title A Postsurgical Prognostic Nomogram for Locally Advanced Rectosigmoid Cancer to Assist in Patient Selection for Adjuvant Chemotherapy
title_full A Postsurgical Prognostic Nomogram for Locally Advanced Rectosigmoid Cancer to Assist in Patient Selection for Adjuvant Chemotherapy
title_fullStr A Postsurgical Prognostic Nomogram for Locally Advanced Rectosigmoid Cancer to Assist in Patient Selection for Adjuvant Chemotherapy
title_full_unstemmed A Postsurgical Prognostic Nomogram for Locally Advanced Rectosigmoid Cancer to Assist in Patient Selection for Adjuvant Chemotherapy
title_short A Postsurgical Prognostic Nomogram for Locally Advanced Rectosigmoid Cancer to Assist in Patient Selection for Adjuvant Chemotherapy
title_sort postsurgical prognostic nomogram for locally advanced rectosigmoid cancer to assist in patient selection for adjuvant chemotherapy
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8739949/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35004292
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.772482
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangchao apostsurgicalprognosticnomogramforlocallyadvancedrectosigmoidcancertoassistinpatientselectionforadjuvantchemotherapy
AT zhaoshutao apostsurgicalprognosticnomogramforlocallyadvancedrectosigmoidcancertoassistinpatientselectionforadjuvantchemotherapy
AT wangxudong apostsurgicalprognosticnomogramforlocallyadvancedrectosigmoidcancertoassistinpatientselectionforadjuvantchemotherapy
AT zhangchao postsurgicalprognosticnomogramforlocallyadvancedrectosigmoidcancertoassistinpatientselectionforadjuvantchemotherapy
AT zhaoshutao postsurgicalprognosticnomogramforlocallyadvancedrectosigmoidcancertoassistinpatientselectionforadjuvantchemotherapy
AT wangxudong postsurgicalprognosticnomogramforlocallyadvancedrectosigmoidcancertoassistinpatientselectionforadjuvantchemotherapy