Cargando…

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Camrelizumab Plus Chemotherapy vs. Chemotherapy Alone as the First-Line Treatment in Patients With IIIB–IV Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Without EGFR and ALK Alteration from a Perspective of Health - Care System in China

Objective: The CAMEL clinical trial (412 patients were randomly assigned to either camrelizumab plus chemotherapy (n = 205) or chemotherapy alone (n = 207)) demonstrated that camrelizumab plus chemotherapy (CC) improved the overall survival time (OS) and progression-free survival time (PFS) of patie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhu, Chen, Xing, Xiao-xuan, Wu, Bin, Liang, Gang, Han, Gang, Lin, Cai-xia, Fang, Hong-mei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8740086/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35002693
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.735536
_version_ 1784629238484172800
author Zhu, Chen
Xing, Xiao-xuan
Wu, Bin
Liang, Gang
Han, Gang
Lin, Cai-xia
Fang, Hong-mei
author_facet Zhu, Chen
Xing, Xiao-xuan
Wu, Bin
Liang, Gang
Han, Gang
Lin, Cai-xia
Fang, Hong-mei
author_sort Zhu, Chen
collection PubMed
description Objective: The CAMEL clinical trial (412 patients were randomly assigned to either camrelizumab plus chemotherapy (n = 205) or chemotherapy alone (n = 207)) demonstrated that camrelizumab plus chemotherapy (CC) improved the overall survival time (OS) and progression-free survival time (PFS) of patients with metastatic nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer (non-sq NSCLC) without epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) or anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) mutations (EGFRm and ALKm) vs. chemotherapy (C) alone. Our objective was to conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis of CC vs. C from a perspective of health - care system in China with a lifetime horizon to identify whether it will be cost-effective. Materials and Methods: A partitioned survival model (PSM) was applied for patients with IIIB–IV non-sq NSCLC without EGFRm and ALKm. Transition parameters and proportions of three health states were derived from the CAMEL trial. The model was designed using a lifetime horizon, a 21-day cycle, and a 5% discount rate of costs and outcomes. It was deemed cost-effective in China if the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) value is less than $32,457 per quality adjusted life-year (QALY). Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to verify the influence of parameter uncertainty on the results. Results: In the base-case analysis, we found that the ICER of CC compared with C is $-7,382.72/QALY which meant that CC had lower costs and better outcomes. The results of the sensitivity analyses demonstrated that the result was robust for the ICERs never transcending the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold. Conclusion: Camrelizumab plus chemotherapy is an obviously cost-effective therapeutic regime for patients of IIIB–IV non-sq NSCLC without EGFRm and ALKm in China at a $32,457 WTP threshold.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8740086
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87400862022-01-08 Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Camrelizumab Plus Chemotherapy vs. Chemotherapy Alone as the First-Line Treatment in Patients With IIIB–IV Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Without EGFR and ALK Alteration from a Perspective of Health - Care System in China Zhu, Chen Xing, Xiao-xuan Wu, Bin Liang, Gang Han, Gang Lin, Cai-xia Fang, Hong-mei Front Pharmacol Pharmacology Objective: The CAMEL clinical trial (412 patients were randomly assigned to either camrelizumab plus chemotherapy (n = 205) or chemotherapy alone (n = 207)) demonstrated that camrelizumab plus chemotherapy (CC) improved the overall survival time (OS) and progression-free survival time (PFS) of patients with metastatic nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer (non-sq NSCLC) without epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) or anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) mutations (EGFRm and ALKm) vs. chemotherapy (C) alone. Our objective was to conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis of CC vs. C from a perspective of health - care system in China with a lifetime horizon to identify whether it will be cost-effective. Materials and Methods: A partitioned survival model (PSM) was applied for patients with IIIB–IV non-sq NSCLC without EGFRm and ALKm. Transition parameters and proportions of three health states were derived from the CAMEL trial. The model was designed using a lifetime horizon, a 21-day cycle, and a 5% discount rate of costs and outcomes. It was deemed cost-effective in China if the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) value is less than $32,457 per quality adjusted life-year (QALY). Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to verify the influence of parameter uncertainty on the results. Results: In the base-case analysis, we found that the ICER of CC compared with C is $-7,382.72/QALY which meant that CC had lower costs and better outcomes. The results of the sensitivity analyses demonstrated that the result was robust for the ICERs never transcending the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold. Conclusion: Camrelizumab plus chemotherapy is an obviously cost-effective therapeutic regime for patients of IIIB–IV non-sq NSCLC without EGFRm and ALKm in China at a $32,457 WTP threshold. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-12-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8740086/ /pubmed/35002693 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.735536 Text en Copyright © 2021 Zhu, Xing, Wu, Liang, Han, Lin and Fang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Pharmacology
Zhu, Chen
Xing, Xiao-xuan
Wu, Bin
Liang, Gang
Han, Gang
Lin, Cai-xia
Fang, Hong-mei
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Camrelizumab Plus Chemotherapy vs. Chemotherapy Alone as the First-Line Treatment in Patients With IIIB–IV Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Without EGFR and ALK Alteration from a Perspective of Health - Care System in China
title Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Camrelizumab Plus Chemotherapy vs. Chemotherapy Alone as the First-Line Treatment in Patients With IIIB–IV Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Without EGFR and ALK Alteration from a Perspective of Health - Care System in China
title_full Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Camrelizumab Plus Chemotherapy vs. Chemotherapy Alone as the First-Line Treatment in Patients With IIIB–IV Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Without EGFR and ALK Alteration from a Perspective of Health - Care System in China
title_fullStr Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Camrelizumab Plus Chemotherapy vs. Chemotherapy Alone as the First-Line Treatment in Patients With IIIB–IV Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Without EGFR and ALK Alteration from a Perspective of Health - Care System in China
title_full_unstemmed Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Camrelizumab Plus Chemotherapy vs. Chemotherapy Alone as the First-Line Treatment in Patients With IIIB–IV Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Without EGFR and ALK Alteration from a Perspective of Health - Care System in China
title_short Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Camrelizumab Plus Chemotherapy vs. Chemotherapy Alone as the First-Line Treatment in Patients With IIIB–IV Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Without EGFR and ALK Alteration from a Perspective of Health - Care System in China
title_sort cost-effectiveness analysis of camrelizumab plus chemotherapy vs. chemotherapy alone as the first-line treatment in patients with iiib–iv non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (nsclc) without egfr and alk alteration from a perspective of health - care system in china
topic Pharmacology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8740086/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35002693
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.735536
work_keys_str_mv AT zhuchen costeffectivenessanalysisofcamrelizumabpluschemotherapyvschemotherapyaloneasthefirstlinetreatmentinpatientswithiiibivnonsquamousnonsmallcelllungcancernsclcwithoutegfrandalkalterationfromaperspectiveofhealthcaresysteminchina
AT xingxiaoxuan costeffectivenessanalysisofcamrelizumabpluschemotherapyvschemotherapyaloneasthefirstlinetreatmentinpatientswithiiibivnonsquamousnonsmallcelllungcancernsclcwithoutegfrandalkalterationfromaperspectiveofhealthcaresysteminchina
AT wubin costeffectivenessanalysisofcamrelizumabpluschemotherapyvschemotherapyaloneasthefirstlinetreatmentinpatientswithiiibivnonsquamousnonsmallcelllungcancernsclcwithoutegfrandalkalterationfromaperspectiveofhealthcaresysteminchina
AT lianggang costeffectivenessanalysisofcamrelizumabpluschemotherapyvschemotherapyaloneasthefirstlinetreatmentinpatientswithiiibivnonsquamousnonsmallcelllungcancernsclcwithoutegfrandalkalterationfromaperspectiveofhealthcaresysteminchina
AT hangang costeffectivenessanalysisofcamrelizumabpluschemotherapyvschemotherapyaloneasthefirstlinetreatmentinpatientswithiiibivnonsquamousnonsmallcelllungcancernsclcwithoutegfrandalkalterationfromaperspectiveofhealthcaresysteminchina
AT lincaixia costeffectivenessanalysisofcamrelizumabpluschemotherapyvschemotherapyaloneasthefirstlinetreatmentinpatientswithiiibivnonsquamousnonsmallcelllungcancernsclcwithoutegfrandalkalterationfromaperspectiveofhealthcaresysteminchina
AT fanghongmei costeffectivenessanalysisofcamrelizumabpluschemotherapyvschemotherapyaloneasthefirstlinetreatmentinpatientswithiiibivnonsquamousnonsmallcelllungcancernsclcwithoutegfrandalkalterationfromaperspectiveofhealthcaresysteminchina