Cargando…
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Camrelizumab Plus Chemotherapy vs. Chemotherapy Alone as the First-Line Treatment in Patients With IIIB–IV Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Without EGFR and ALK Alteration from a Perspective of Health - Care System in China
Objective: The CAMEL clinical trial (412 patients were randomly assigned to either camrelizumab plus chemotherapy (n = 205) or chemotherapy alone (n = 207)) demonstrated that camrelizumab plus chemotherapy (CC) improved the overall survival time (OS) and progression-free survival time (PFS) of patie...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8740086/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35002693 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.735536 |
_version_ | 1784629238484172800 |
---|---|
author | Zhu, Chen Xing, Xiao-xuan Wu, Bin Liang, Gang Han, Gang Lin, Cai-xia Fang, Hong-mei |
author_facet | Zhu, Chen Xing, Xiao-xuan Wu, Bin Liang, Gang Han, Gang Lin, Cai-xia Fang, Hong-mei |
author_sort | Zhu, Chen |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective: The CAMEL clinical trial (412 patients were randomly assigned to either camrelizumab plus chemotherapy (n = 205) or chemotherapy alone (n = 207)) demonstrated that camrelizumab plus chemotherapy (CC) improved the overall survival time (OS) and progression-free survival time (PFS) of patients with metastatic nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer (non-sq NSCLC) without epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) or anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) mutations (EGFRm and ALKm) vs. chemotherapy (C) alone. Our objective was to conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis of CC vs. C from a perspective of health - care system in China with a lifetime horizon to identify whether it will be cost-effective. Materials and Methods: A partitioned survival model (PSM) was applied for patients with IIIB–IV non-sq NSCLC without EGFRm and ALKm. Transition parameters and proportions of three health states were derived from the CAMEL trial. The model was designed using a lifetime horizon, a 21-day cycle, and a 5% discount rate of costs and outcomes. It was deemed cost-effective in China if the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) value is less than $32,457 per quality adjusted life-year (QALY). Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to verify the influence of parameter uncertainty on the results. Results: In the base-case analysis, we found that the ICER of CC compared with C is $-7,382.72/QALY which meant that CC had lower costs and better outcomes. The results of the sensitivity analyses demonstrated that the result was robust for the ICERs never transcending the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold. Conclusion: Camrelizumab plus chemotherapy is an obviously cost-effective therapeutic regime for patients of IIIB–IV non-sq NSCLC without EGFRm and ALKm in China at a $32,457 WTP threshold. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8740086 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87400862022-01-08 Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Camrelizumab Plus Chemotherapy vs. Chemotherapy Alone as the First-Line Treatment in Patients With IIIB–IV Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Without EGFR and ALK Alteration from a Perspective of Health - Care System in China Zhu, Chen Xing, Xiao-xuan Wu, Bin Liang, Gang Han, Gang Lin, Cai-xia Fang, Hong-mei Front Pharmacol Pharmacology Objective: The CAMEL clinical trial (412 patients were randomly assigned to either camrelizumab plus chemotherapy (n = 205) or chemotherapy alone (n = 207)) demonstrated that camrelizumab plus chemotherapy (CC) improved the overall survival time (OS) and progression-free survival time (PFS) of patients with metastatic nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer (non-sq NSCLC) without epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) or anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) mutations (EGFRm and ALKm) vs. chemotherapy (C) alone. Our objective was to conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis of CC vs. C from a perspective of health - care system in China with a lifetime horizon to identify whether it will be cost-effective. Materials and Methods: A partitioned survival model (PSM) was applied for patients with IIIB–IV non-sq NSCLC without EGFRm and ALKm. Transition parameters and proportions of three health states were derived from the CAMEL trial. The model was designed using a lifetime horizon, a 21-day cycle, and a 5% discount rate of costs and outcomes. It was deemed cost-effective in China if the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) value is less than $32,457 per quality adjusted life-year (QALY). Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to verify the influence of parameter uncertainty on the results. Results: In the base-case analysis, we found that the ICER of CC compared with C is $-7,382.72/QALY which meant that CC had lower costs and better outcomes. The results of the sensitivity analyses demonstrated that the result was robust for the ICERs never transcending the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold. Conclusion: Camrelizumab plus chemotherapy is an obviously cost-effective therapeutic regime for patients of IIIB–IV non-sq NSCLC without EGFRm and ALKm in China at a $32,457 WTP threshold. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-12-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8740086/ /pubmed/35002693 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.735536 Text en Copyright © 2021 Zhu, Xing, Wu, Liang, Han, Lin and Fang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Pharmacology Zhu, Chen Xing, Xiao-xuan Wu, Bin Liang, Gang Han, Gang Lin, Cai-xia Fang, Hong-mei Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Camrelizumab Plus Chemotherapy vs. Chemotherapy Alone as the First-Line Treatment in Patients With IIIB–IV Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Without EGFR and ALK Alteration from a Perspective of Health - Care System in China |
title | Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Camrelizumab Plus Chemotherapy vs. Chemotherapy Alone as the First-Line Treatment in Patients With IIIB–IV Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Without EGFR and ALK Alteration from a Perspective of Health - Care System in China |
title_full | Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Camrelizumab Plus Chemotherapy vs. Chemotherapy Alone as the First-Line Treatment in Patients With IIIB–IV Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Without EGFR and ALK Alteration from a Perspective of Health - Care System in China |
title_fullStr | Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Camrelizumab Plus Chemotherapy vs. Chemotherapy Alone as the First-Line Treatment in Patients With IIIB–IV Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Without EGFR and ALK Alteration from a Perspective of Health - Care System in China |
title_full_unstemmed | Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Camrelizumab Plus Chemotherapy vs. Chemotherapy Alone as the First-Line Treatment in Patients With IIIB–IV Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Without EGFR and ALK Alteration from a Perspective of Health - Care System in China |
title_short | Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Camrelizumab Plus Chemotherapy vs. Chemotherapy Alone as the First-Line Treatment in Patients With IIIB–IV Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Without EGFR and ALK Alteration from a Perspective of Health - Care System in China |
title_sort | cost-effectiveness analysis of camrelizumab plus chemotherapy vs. chemotherapy alone as the first-line treatment in patients with iiib–iv non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (nsclc) without egfr and alk alteration from a perspective of health - care system in china |
topic | Pharmacology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8740086/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35002693 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.735536 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhuchen costeffectivenessanalysisofcamrelizumabpluschemotherapyvschemotherapyaloneasthefirstlinetreatmentinpatientswithiiibivnonsquamousnonsmallcelllungcancernsclcwithoutegfrandalkalterationfromaperspectiveofhealthcaresysteminchina AT xingxiaoxuan costeffectivenessanalysisofcamrelizumabpluschemotherapyvschemotherapyaloneasthefirstlinetreatmentinpatientswithiiibivnonsquamousnonsmallcelllungcancernsclcwithoutegfrandalkalterationfromaperspectiveofhealthcaresysteminchina AT wubin costeffectivenessanalysisofcamrelizumabpluschemotherapyvschemotherapyaloneasthefirstlinetreatmentinpatientswithiiibivnonsquamousnonsmallcelllungcancernsclcwithoutegfrandalkalterationfromaperspectiveofhealthcaresysteminchina AT lianggang costeffectivenessanalysisofcamrelizumabpluschemotherapyvschemotherapyaloneasthefirstlinetreatmentinpatientswithiiibivnonsquamousnonsmallcelllungcancernsclcwithoutegfrandalkalterationfromaperspectiveofhealthcaresysteminchina AT hangang costeffectivenessanalysisofcamrelizumabpluschemotherapyvschemotherapyaloneasthefirstlinetreatmentinpatientswithiiibivnonsquamousnonsmallcelllungcancernsclcwithoutegfrandalkalterationfromaperspectiveofhealthcaresysteminchina AT lincaixia costeffectivenessanalysisofcamrelizumabpluschemotherapyvschemotherapyaloneasthefirstlinetreatmentinpatientswithiiibivnonsquamousnonsmallcelllungcancernsclcwithoutegfrandalkalterationfromaperspectiveofhealthcaresysteminchina AT fanghongmei costeffectivenessanalysisofcamrelizumabpluschemotherapyvschemotherapyaloneasthefirstlinetreatmentinpatientswithiiibivnonsquamousnonsmallcelllungcancernsclcwithoutegfrandalkalterationfromaperspectiveofhealthcaresysteminchina |