Cargando…

Shaping ability of ProTaper Gold and WaveOne Gold nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated S-shaped root canals

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Gold metal technology improves flexibility and the resistance to cyclic fatigue of the endodontic mechanical files. This study compared the performance of ProTaper Gold (PTG) multiple file system and WaveOne Gold (WOG) single file system in simulated S-shaped root canals, which r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shi, Lu, Zhou, Junling, Wan, Jie, Yang, Yunfei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Association for Dental Sciences of the Republic of China 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8740102/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35028067
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2021.08.008
_version_ 1784629242182500352
author Shi, Lu
Zhou, Junling
Wan, Jie
Yang, Yunfei
author_facet Shi, Lu
Zhou, Junling
Wan, Jie
Yang, Yunfei
author_sort Shi, Lu
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Gold metal technology improves flexibility and the resistance to cyclic fatigue of the endodontic mechanical files. This study compared the performance of ProTaper Gold (PTG) multiple file system and WaveOne Gold (WOG) single file system in simulated S-shaped root canals, which represents one of the most challenging root canal morphology. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty S-shaped canals (n = 20 canals/per group) in resin blocks were instrumented to an apical size of 0.25 mm using PTG and WOG Primary, respectively. The total amount of resin removal, canal transportation, centering ratio, and the degree of canal straightening were measured in Photoshop CS6 software. Statistical analysis was performed by using Mann–Whitney U-test (α = .05). RESULTS: None of the files fractured during the instrumentation. The WOG group removed significantly less amount of resin at 0, 3, 6, 7 and 9 mm from the apex (P < .05). The WOG group remained more centered in canals at 0 mm from the apex (P < .05). The PTG group showed a better centering ability and less canal transportation at 4, 5 and 6 mm from the apex (P < .05). In the coronal curvature portion, the use of WOG Primary significantly decreased curvature angle and increased radius compared with PTG instruments (P < .05). There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of the apical curvature angle and radius change (P > .05). CONCLUSION: The WOG Primary file has a less aggressive dentin cutting and more centered apical preparation. The PTG system is more advantageous in shaping the coronal curvature of S-shaped canal.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8740102
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Association for Dental Sciences of the Republic of China
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87401022022-01-12 Shaping ability of ProTaper Gold and WaveOne Gold nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated S-shaped root canals Shi, Lu Zhou, Junling Wan, Jie Yang, Yunfei J Dent Sci Original Article BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Gold metal technology improves flexibility and the resistance to cyclic fatigue of the endodontic mechanical files. This study compared the performance of ProTaper Gold (PTG) multiple file system and WaveOne Gold (WOG) single file system in simulated S-shaped root canals, which represents one of the most challenging root canal morphology. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty S-shaped canals (n = 20 canals/per group) in resin blocks were instrumented to an apical size of 0.25 mm using PTG and WOG Primary, respectively. The total amount of resin removal, canal transportation, centering ratio, and the degree of canal straightening were measured in Photoshop CS6 software. Statistical analysis was performed by using Mann–Whitney U-test (α = .05). RESULTS: None of the files fractured during the instrumentation. The WOG group removed significantly less amount of resin at 0, 3, 6, 7 and 9 mm from the apex (P < .05). The WOG group remained more centered in canals at 0 mm from the apex (P < .05). The PTG group showed a better centering ability and less canal transportation at 4, 5 and 6 mm from the apex (P < .05). In the coronal curvature portion, the use of WOG Primary significantly decreased curvature angle and increased radius compared with PTG instruments (P < .05). There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of the apical curvature angle and radius change (P > .05). CONCLUSION: The WOG Primary file has a less aggressive dentin cutting and more centered apical preparation. The PTG system is more advantageous in shaping the coronal curvature of S-shaped canal. Association for Dental Sciences of the Republic of China 2022-01 2021-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8740102/ /pubmed/35028067 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2021.08.008 Text en © 2021 Association for Dental Sciences of the Republic of China. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Shi, Lu
Zhou, Junling
Wan, Jie
Yang, Yunfei
Shaping ability of ProTaper Gold and WaveOne Gold nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated S-shaped root canals
title Shaping ability of ProTaper Gold and WaveOne Gold nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated S-shaped root canals
title_full Shaping ability of ProTaper Gold and WaveOne Gold nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated S-shaped root canals
title_fullStr Shaping ability of ProTaper Gold and WaveOne Gold nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated S-shaped root canals
title_full_unstemmed Shaping ability of ProTaper Gold and WaveOne Gold nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated S-shaped root canals
title_short Shaping ability of ProTaper Gold and WaveOne Gold nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated S-shaped root canals
title_sort shaping ability of protaper gold and waveone gold nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated s-shaped root canals
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8740102/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35028067
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2021.08.008
work_keys_str_mv AT shilu shapingabilityofprotapergoldandwaveonegoldnickeltitaniumrotaryinstrumentsinsimulatedsshapedrootcanals
AT zhoujunling shapingabilityofprotapergoldandwaveonegoldnickeltitaniumrotaryinstrumentsinsimulatedsshapedrootcanals
AT wanjie shapingabilityofprotapergoldandwaveonegoldnickeltitaniumrotaryinstrumentsinsimulatedsshapedrootcanals
AT yangyunfei shapingabilityofprotapergoldandwaveonegoldnickeltitaniumrotaryinstrumentsinsimulatedsshapedrootcanals